James105

Sucks to be Jaguar right now. They were clearly expecting a Harris win and a continuation of the woke nonsense and spent no doubt tens of millions on an epic failure of a rebrand. Sad to see an iconic British brand doing this to themselves but they only have themselves to blame as apparently they had 15 different DEI groups... in a car company. Their sole purpose is to make and sell cars and their typical buyers are almost exclusively middle aged white men who will now be turned off from the brand. HBO are doing good things. Watched the Penguin recently and it really was quite excellent.

The BBC give them the womens footballer of the year award despite being banned from playing football in the Africa cup of nations for failing gender eligibility tests of course. It's been a rough few decades for the patriarchy with those pesky (actual) women getting equal rights and all that, but men have finally found a workaround using the classic "if you can't beat them join them" technique. Go patriarchy! https://onefootball.com/en/news/africa-cup-of-nations-barbra-banda-banned-due-to-gender-eligibility-issues-35400347

A "mostly peaceful" school boy you mean? Tommy Robinson himself just repeated claims from witnesses at the school, who then retracted their statements after the fact (for some £££ unknown reason) and then Robinson secretly recorded their original claims which backed up his claims. So I think "innocent man" is a bit of a stretch and the fact you used 'man' instead of schoolboy shows how little you know about this case, but have a gold star for supporting the approved state narrative anyway. This will for sure keep you away from the gulag for a while longer under the current regime. Keep up the good work comrade.

He is observing (correctly) that the UK is becoming an authoritarian police state that is policing certain political opinions and arresting and jailing people for these opinions. Maybe "centrist democrats" do not want to hear these uncomfortable truths but I personally think that someone with as much reach as Musk has should use his voice to highlight this. Maybe if enough voices tell Starmer that he is in the wrong it will eventually seep into his thick skull and he will be shamed into resigning. I haven't seen him post anything about the clowns in the UK government that I would consider "ignorant".

Uncomfortable truths continue to be uncomfortable for leftists is what I read from this.

She also (probably) refuses to label 2+2=5, refuses to state that men can actually become women, and is well aware that if Israel actually wanted to commit genocide they could have done so in the first hour after the attack and wiped Gaza off the map, rather than the painfully slow approach of targeted strikes and giving warnings before the strike even happens.

It's almost laughable in its obviousness now. Met police have already raced to visit this person who received mildly offensive joke fake petition posts. Don't think Nigel Farage will be visited anytime soon to start the investigation about the one calling for his execution.

No, he has not. He admitted to breaching a court order. The claims he made were confirmed (albeit with secret recording) by witnesses including the teachers, but the judge decided to believe the "mostly peaceful" Syrian boy instead. He has never admitted to spreading false claims.

I don't see how any of that list even slightly benefits the UK, certainly not in comparison to the problems it brings. Let me ask it a different way, if all Muslims in the UK decided to pack up and leave overnight and go to the middle east what would the UK actually lose? I could easily make an argument that if all Christians or Sikhs or Jews etc left the UK would lose something significant and be poorer for it. Not sure why you think I am a Tory supporter. The Tories are merely tolerated by myself as they are (were) the only party able to keep the nightmare of a Labour government at bay, and the managed decline they bring is preferable to the bankruptcy and cruelty that is underway under Labour. Tories are also weak and scared of the threat from Muslims as evidenced by Batley. The 2 tier system was indeed present under the Tories but not to the extent that it is under Labour. If you need to compare the atrocities happening in the UK under Islam with what happens in 3rd world countries , does that not demonstrate just how far the UK has fallen?

White supremacist? Really? I didn't realize Islam was a race I actually thought it was an ideology. Anyway I am prepared to change my mind. Perhaps you can educate me on the benefits Islam brings to the UK versus the cons. I can think of plenty of cons with terrorism, subjugation of women that are not allowed to work, incestual marriages, FGM, grooming rape gangs, burhkas, blashphomy "laws" (Batley school teacher), higher than average unemployment and anti-semitism. For the pros I am struggling to think of anything they bring that is positive. I'm sure you will mention doctors and nurses etc but unless they are here in a higher percentage than other groups I don't think that counts. So feel free to educate me and change my mind. Since there is a 2 tier justice system and none of the violent mob that threatened to kill the Batley school teacher or the thugs from Manchester airport are in those stats you provided, as well as the police not typically recording this information (or making it available) I am inclined not to believe the stats on crime here, but I didn't include it in my list of cons anyway.

The Tories need to get rid of Badenoch as leader within the next few years as she is just another globalist. Huge mistake not going for Jenrick whose policies were aligned with Reform and would have worked with them. With Badenoch as leader (who will not work with Reform) it will be a repeat of this year with several right leaning parties all vying for votes against each other and we know exactly how that will work out. Even with a bankrupt country and IMF bailouts Labour would still win by default due to the nature of the voting system.

Quite clearly it hasn't acted as a deterrent as I supplied you with evidence of someone making a post demanding that a politician be executed. So imposing such a sentence merely ruins that persons life for no good reason whatsoever. The burden of proof for taking someones freedom away should be a bit higher than "maybe it contributed, maybe it didn't" don't you think? I'm in favour of all terrorists on the watchlists being deported and making the religion of Islam illegal in the UK so no, I am not a free speech absolutist. There are certain cultures that are so backwards and so incompatible and have such hatred of the west and all it stands for that they should return to one of the many, many countries where they can practice their barbaric ways. Without this religion those 3 innocent little girls that were slaughtered in Southport would be alive and well today and Connolly would be free living her life in peace as she would never have made such a post.

I think that was the system in place 10 years ago before the trans movement went insane and demanded self identifying male fantasists should be treated as though they are women in sports, in changing rooms, in womens shelters and even in extreme cases, - - for an actual convicted rapist - jails (looking at you Scotland), without making any physical changes to their bodies. That wasn't enough for them either and they went after the kids. Literally nobody cared before then and certainly nobody was talking about it. The liberal women hating men who are the trans activists have done her a massive disservice as now she has lost something that she previously had.

Going to be tricky for her once America course corrects on DEI hiring I think as I don't think she will really want to be competing for positions on merit alone. She might have to lower her expectations in line with her abilities.

The fact that their incompetence will lead to avoidable deaths should really lead to corporate manslaughter charges, especially since their own study highlighted just how many would die from this policy, so they cannot even claim ignorance. Harold Shipman (only) managed to kill 284 old people over a period of 30 years. Labour will be responsible for at least 4000 in just their first year of government.

So they just receive money do they and don't have any of these things called... costs? I'd highly recommend you continue to stay away from running a business as you would likely crash it faster than the a girl from a customer complaints team would if given the job of running the UK economy. Much safer financially for you if you continue to share your business "wisdom" on here for our entertainment.

Look at this clown. Announcing something that is already illegal to now be illegal. If he really wanted women and girls to be safe then perhaps he could try and "smash the gangs" and stop the fighting aged men arriving illegally on small boats, deport every single one that has arrived on small boats rather than put them up in hotels and deport every single one of the rape gang perpetrators so they never get to rape an English girl again.

To be fair if they are overweight and unemployed I would turn off their electric from the grid and hook them up to an energy generating treadmill to at least contribute their own energy to "net zero" as well as losing some weight. If only BlackRock made energy producing treadmills then we could have seen this (in my humble opinion) quite ingenious policy, but they are more likely to have their fat fingers in Big Pharma.

So your premise now is that it is deranged maniacs that act on peoples social media words and if nobody posted hurty words on social media they would not ever carry out a deranged act even though they are deranged maniacs? Really? You still avoided my question though. What sentence (if any) should the individual who posted the example above receive? It's okay to admit you were wrong and there should be no custodial sentence given for posting mean words on social media if you do not think he should be jailed for this.

Ok lets put it to the test then. Here is another example recently posted on Twitter. What jail term do you think should be imposed for this - an actual demand to execute someone? 31 months the same as Connolly or longer as it is not just 'tacit approval' it is a demand to execute someone? My view is these are just words and at most require a ban from social media for while, as calling for someone to be executed is unpleasant. What say you? I've "chopped off" the more explicit parts but its still available here: https://x.com/Paul_LFC3/status/1860771030509203529

Not until next April though eh? According to Labours own study there will be at least 4000 pensioners who will not survive this winter due to the removal by Labour of the Winter fuel allowance to benefit from this policy that the Tories introduced.

I think Corbynism was socialism with good intentions, but this... This is something very different. I don't think Corbyn would have partnered with BlackRock in the same week that IHT for farmers was introduced (when BlackRock have been buying up farmland) or escalating the Ukraine conflict when BlackRock already have the contracts for rebuilding Ukraine and supplying weapons. There is some seriously dirty money involved in Starmerism. Surprised the leftists are still so enthused about it considering how anti big business they claim to be. Anyway, that reminds me, maybe its time to purchase some BlackRock shares as there is another 4.5 years of this to go.

Bookmark it if you like. Rachel from the customer complaints team with her anti-growth policies will ensure it happens. Economics 101 (obviously the class she skipped out on) is very clear that you cannot tax your way to growth. My next prediction is that when growth does not happen, Labour will be back for more taxes, inhibiting growth even further.

£400bn was lost on covid lockdowns. Labour wanted harder and longer lockdowns so the bill would very likely have been much, much higher. Yes the Tories were awful hence they are no longer in government, but as awful as they were they are nowhere near as bad as these incompetent clowns in government now.

If that was in the Labour manifesto and people voted for it then yes, there could and should be another referendum, as that is how the last one was granted. Was it in their manifesto?