James105

What do you disagree with here specifically? What do you think should be the appropriate sentence for raping a 13 year old child?

What, you mean that Trump hasn't really started working at a McDonalds and it was just a political stunt? By a politician? Are leftists so low IQ that they are shocked that Trump isn't really going to be working at a McDonalds and it was just a publicity gimmick? Crikey.

My criticism was aimed at those blaming previous governments for the failings (perceived or otherwise) of the clowns currently occupying government in the UK. I didn't actually criticise the clowns or their policy on this occasion. I didn't even mention that Lammy is completely unsuited for this or any role in government even though I am continuously surprised by the accidents of circumstance that finds him in the highest levels of government rather than what feels like his appropriate level of a junior shoe shop assistant in Tottenham. I never claimed that they did so I'm not sure why you want me to be your research assistant here. If that is something you wish to know then I suggest you avail yourself with the services of google.

Once again it seems you are a little bit confused. Perhaps you could point out where I did in fact criticise the policy in my comment as I am not aware I did so. My observation was that blaming the previous government for actions of the current government is silly as you have no way of knowing what the final result would have been if these clowns hadn't taken over the big top, nor do you know if the telegraph would not have criticised the Tories for the same as it didn't happen under their watch.

You seem to be confused. The Tories are not in power and they didn't implement this which is why the article is referring to the current clowns occupying the big top. Labour are the current government and have the power to implement policies. The Tories do not. Labour have proven that no matter what the previous government initiated they have the majority to overturn it just as they did with the Rwanda policy. I know the clowns in government like to blame everything on the previous government but you are not in government so you can be better than they are and not lower yourself to their embarrassing level.

Yawn. They said the same in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s and on and on. Not surprisingly we are still here living ever longer lives. Even the hobgoblin has become bored of this and jumped onto a different bandwagon.

Eating less + doing more exercise = weight loss! No side effects either unlike there is with Labours plan to inject fatties with taxpayer funded medication. You are welcome.

Unless these drugs also changes the desire of the fat person to eat junk food and cakes and motivates them to do some exercise then they will be on these drugs for life since as soon as they stop taking these drugs they are back to square one. This is good for the pharmaceutical company and the MPs taking the kickbacks, but I don't really see how this is good for the taxpayer. A better and cheaper option (since Labour have now opened the can of worms linking obesity to unemployment benefits) would be monthly weigh-ins for those on benefits and only those who demonstrate weight loss continue to get the full amount when not in work, and those who do not get reduced benefits and the savings of which go directly to the NHS. So either they lose weight or get a job. Win for the taxpayer, win for the NHS, win for the individual.

Are the fatties unable to access healthy food? Why is this? Are the fruit and vegetable aisles in supermarkets too narrow for them to fit in or something? Nice to see Labour finding a use for the unemployed though by using them as human guinea pigs for experimental drugs.

"Brooklyn Motorist Arrested for Threatening to Kill Jews" Those pesky "Brooklyn motorists". Do all "Brooklyn motorists" want to kill jews? Is it related to the traffic conditions over there? Wonder if there is anything else afoot that would cause this resentment towards jews.

This was indeed painful to watch. They should really try scripting it in advance rather than attempting to ad-lib something thrown together at the last minute without any kind of rehearsal, especially if they could not find any comedians to participate in this sketch.

I'm anti-terrorist. Whoever is killing terrorists gets my approval. If you would prefer the bombings to stop then it will once either the terrorists are killed or they surrender and return the innocent civilian hostages who are most likely being raped and tortured on a daily basis by their captors. Why is it do you think that neighbouring muslim countries have not opened their doors so that the "innocent" Palestinians can take refuge there?

And leave the terrorists on their doorstep to plan and carry out more rapes, murders, kidnappings and mutilations of innocent Jews? Do you really hate the Jews so much that you do not wish them to be able to defend themselves from these kind of atrocities?

What kind of punishment do you think this guy deserves for his nazi salute?

Hamas can stop the killing right now, today, by returning the hostages and surrendering. Why is it on Isreal to stop when they were the ones who had people raped, maimed, butchered in cold blood? Do you really hate Jews that much you don't want them to be able to defend themselves against the terrorists on their doorsteps? If the Palestinians are all so innocent why is it do you think the neighbouring muslim countries are not opening their doors and welcoming them into their countries?

The UN rulings are non binding advisories and are not law so there was no need for the UK to do anything. It was the wrong thing to do. They didn't even ask the islanders. Mauritius has never owned the islands and have no claim to them and not just that, they are an ally to a strategic rival in China. On top of that the UK will now be paying rent on this which will be an embarrassing amount of money which is why Labour are not telling how much as though they can keep it secret indefinately - that is how stupid they are. This Labour government has made many stupid, ill conceived, embarrassing choices since they gained power that make the UK poorer, weaker and less secure. This is just one of so, so many. They are out of their depth and out of control. Absolute clown show.

Don't forget solar panels!! Look how green these fields are:

Rerun the islands? Bit early to be drinking isn't it? If you meant to say "return" then that would be equally nonsensical considering that Mauritius has never actually owned them. As the article says, starting negotiations is not the same as concluding them, and Labour have form for being pathetically weak negotiators as we saw from the capitulation with the train drivers who were given everything they wanted for absolutely nothing in return. Now Labour will have to face the embarrassment of owning up to their incompetence and how much more taxpayers money they have squandered for nothing in return. Utter shambles of a government.

There fraudsters are not asking for your money though as they are taking it regardless to enrich themselves, and as long as there are enough useful idiots who believe humans have any significant impact on the climate then they will continue to get away with it. Labour in the UK are wasting £22bn of taxpayers money on ludicrous, unproven nonsense such as "carbon capture", which aims to capture just 2.4% of the total emissions per year of the UK's emissions and bury them in the ground, and the UK are responsible for just 1% of the global emissions anyway. They could have planted trees which have been doing this job free of charge for millions of years, but of course that would not make the rich people richer.

He does not represent the interests of the British people or the country. Every action taken so far has been to weaken the UK. The clowns are now going to create a £22bn black hole by spending this amount of taxpayers money on carbon capture (an unproven technology) so their friends in the oil industry can keep burning oil. Was this in the manifesto? Of course it wasn't. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/oct/04/labour-to-commit-almost-22bn-to-fund-carbon-capture-and-storage-projects At some point even you will have to concede that these people are clowns who are either outrageously corrupt or outrageously stupid.

Give what another go? You want a link to a labour politician stating that the only reason they did this was to distract the attention away from a weak PM who has a penchant for receiving gifts from sugar daddies so there was no choice but to weaken the UK by giving away strategic territories to strategic rivals at great expense to the tax payer? I highly doubt that even these clowns would admit to such a thing, but anyone with a double digit IQ can see the obvious for what it is. I can't it if you cannot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_cat_strategy The UN? No country abides by their motions unless it benefits them as their rulings are non binding. The fact the clowns in government did just shows how weak they are. The clowns transferred sovereignty of a strategic territory to a state it never belonged to who is an ally of a strategic rival and agreed to pay for the privilege. Still, it gives the media something else to talk about other than Free Gear Keirs sugar daddy gifts as that story was not going away. Oh, and the Chagos islanders feel betrayed too, so there is that.

This pointless and needless action is going to cost money: "As part of the deal, the U.K. will retain sovereignty of Diego Garcia for an initial period of 99 years, and will pay Mauritius an undisclosed rent. It will also create a “resettlement” fund for displaced Chagossians aimed at letting them move back to the islands other than Diego Garcia." https://apnews.com/article/uk-mauritius-chagos-diego-garcia-base-37d13bf54f9769f3621bd41d08a448f8 How much will it cost the UK then to rent these islands then? There is a reason it is "undisclosed" as it will be an embarrassing amount of money. There was no urgent need for this. Nobody was making lots of noise about it. The only reason for it is a distraction. I understand their need to change the news agenda as they are getting hammered for Free gear kiers penchant for gifts from sugar daddies, but this will cost yet more taxpayers money being frittered away abroad for nothing in return. Argentina will be next demanding the Falklands, followed by Spain with Gibraltar as they have seen how weak and useless these clowns are.

It's not a return as these islands were never "owned" by Mauritius, who will now be charging the UK 'rent' on something given to them that they have never owned. This is why the Tories never went through with it as even they are not daft enough to do this. The reason this has happened out of the blue is to move the media away from discussing free gear Kier's sugar daddy, which will no doubt end up costing the tax payer countless billions as he is a weak man unable to cope with justifiable criticism. These clowns are out of their depth and out of control.

Did they even ask the people that lived there before giving it away? It's not even just giving it away, it is giving it away and then paying them to have it with taxpayers money for an undisclosed amount. I presume this is yet another thing that wasn't on the manifesto and doesn't face a vote in parliament? How are they even allowed to do this? Every day Labour does something that makes the UK weaker, less secure and poorer.