James105

I can believe it for sure. The "straight white male" sits at the very bottom of the oppression pyramid so the only way to combat that is to claim to be a member of a group that will give you a some victim points, and claiming to be transgender gets promotion from the very bottom to the very top of this pyramid. Also, there is no requirement to actually change any behaviour to be a member of these groups so it is completely harmless to do so.

Sounds like someone might of scored quite highly... what was your score? Just how "far-right" are you?

Well (they say) the universe is 13 billion years old so depending on how long it took their intelligent life to appear on whatever planets out there sustain life, and whether they had any extinction level events (like earth has experienced) would all factor in to how advanced they are. Humans are still so primitive really, only being around for 200,000 years and only really becoming civilised 6000 years ago which allowed for collaboration and technical advancement. Any advanced species would dismiss the notion of an all powerful sky wizard I would think, and the fact that humans still do is a testament to just how primitive a species we still are. If we as a species survive for another million years I expect we will find ways and means to travel the vast distances of space to be able to encounter other life but is highly unrealistic that we will see aliens in the next decade, or even tens of Millenia.

I wasn't making an argument, I was merely stating a fact with the tweet as evidence. If you think facts are foolish I cannot help you there.

Is this the same Diane Abbott being referred to? She is a racist. What is that they say about people in glass houses?

So on one hand you think there should be a by-election when the earliest it could realistically be organised is May, and then you think the general election is going to be May. Can you see the very obvious flaw in your comments here?

Nobody is suggesting that trans people cannot compete in sport. There is already a category specifically for trans women which is the mens category or open category. In competitive sports the number of places is restricted and every time a man enters a womens competition they prevent a woman from participating.

Probably as common sense suggested that trans women are not actually women and should not be competing against women, or taking the hard earned place of a woman on the tour as it is blatantly unfair. Since common sense is seemingly absent from many on the left who cannot seem to grasp the fact that men competing against women is not fair in any sport that requires physicality, there now has been a rule added to address this.

Regardless of whether or not they are upheld for whatever spurious reason (suddenly decided to get baptised, turned gay etc), the system is being abused on an industrial scale, so much so that even someone from Thailand is actually taken seriously for asylum and is allowed to remain in the country.

The thing that bugs me is that this is not even a clear case of a wrongful shooting of a civilian. The guy they shot was a terrorist who had his suicide vest nearby and they chose not to take any chances with their own lives. Taking a prisoner who was prepared to take their own life anyway for his cause would put their own lives in danger. It's like they have scrabbled to find something (anything) to pin on a solder or soldiers and this was the best they could come up with to make it look like they are doing "something" to appease the angry mobs (along with the million pound muslim memorial), which of course is far easier than actually dealing with the angry mobs on their hate marches.

ANZAC is quite obviously not a religion so a bit pointless mentioning that don't you think? What specifically did I say that was "Islamaphobic" (sic) in your opinion, or do you just like to throw around a word (to quote Christopher Hitchens) invented by fascists, used by cowards to manipulate morons without meaning or purpose to make you feel virtuous in some misguided way?

We already have them:

Ok, fine. In a cemetery there is a block of stone that recognises how many Jewish people died which numbered about 6 million jews. I suspect it cost no more than £10000 to put up. Now, why would there specifically need to be £1,000,000 spent on the muslim contribution to the war efforts? What did muslims do over and above the Hindus, the Buddhists, the atheists, the scientologists, the christians or catholics that justifies this expenditure. And why specifically now? These stories do not seem random. Nobody (as far as I know) was pushing for SAS troops to be arrested for using excessive force against a terrorist in a war 2 years ago, nor was anyone pushing for muslims specifically to have their own war memorial. So why now?

2 years ago. Wonder why they felt the need to do this today, and publicise it heavily as well. The chancellor announced in the budget yesterday - the very first thing he mentioned in fact - that there would be a million pounds given to a special muslim memorial for muslims who participated in WW1 and WW2. No other religion has a special memorial for this, just memorials that commemorate all those who sacrificed their lives in these wars. What on earth is going on with the UK that has turned this once proud nation into (at least at governmental level) appeasers for the religion of "peace"?

I have no idea how this "content creator" managed to get himself in the news for such an ordinary thing of moving to Thailand. There is literally nothing special about his story or him as a person. He is (or was) just an £11 an hour receptionist with no particular talent to speak of. Baffling. So credit where it is due, he has managed to get his face/name in the news (not just Thai news but UK national newspapers as well) and this will give him a boost on his FaceTokTube channel. Presumably this has come at the cost of doing some kind of deal with the devil though.

Well if this keeps the climate catastrophizing crazies away from sunny places like Thailand then this is a good news story. "However, the rise of coolcationing is not without its challenges. Increased shipping and tourist boat traffic in the Arctic pose significant environmental risks, threatening delicate ecosystems and wildlife habitats." Let's not pretend that the environmental cost of getting to these places and then threatening the delicate ecosystems and wildlife habitats is of even minor concern to these people in comparison to the opportunity to signal how virtuous they have been to their blue haired soy latte drinking friends when they get back from their "coolcation".

I know this one! It has to be the far right... right? Does he have farightophobia?

Here is a picture of people engaged in activism: So if the far right abused/insulted/attacked this mob you would state that it is their own fault for poking the bear and they are reaping what they sowed? Or do you have different standards for non Jews?

It's referring to anyone who has a hatred of Jews. Unlike yourself I didn't lump everyone of a certain religion into this. It's funny how the sentence 'intolerant Jew hating racists' immediately makes you think of one particular religion though don't you think? Do you also think that Jews should leave the UK if they don't want to put up with the abuse from Jew haters?

This is one of the most racist pieces of dribble I've seen yet, and that was already quite a high bar on this site. If they don't like being abused by the hateful mobs they should leave? Really? Did you have this racist opinion in the 80s when there was actual genuine racism against black and asian people, that they should just go back home rather than the state deal with the problem of racism? Thankfully the UK at the time dealt with the primary problem, only to then abandon this progress by importing tens of thousands of intolerant Jew hating racists from abroad. Weirdly, this type of racism gets the full approval of the left. How times change.

I can condemn Hamas every day they do not surrender, return the hostages and face justice for the atrocities they committed on 7th October. If they cared about the plight of Palestinians then they would have done so. They have the power to introduce a permanent ceasefire right this second by surrendering and returning the hostages. There can be no negotiations about peaceful coexistence whilst one side is a terrorist organisation that wants to wipe Isreal off the face of the earth. War is a messy business and there has not been a single war in the history of wars where there were not thousands of innocents caught up in it. The Isreali soldiers wear a uniform. Hamas could avoid so many civilian casualties if they also wore a uniform. If I lived in Palestine I would be cursing Hamas for forcing this conflict and I would want Hamas to surrender. I would want a non terrorist supporting democratically elected government. I would want peace and trade with my neighbours. Hamas wants none of that. Isreal needs to eradicate Hamas for the security of their citizens. Does that help?

I just do not like terrorists, I do not like the mass rape and slaughter of innocents at a musical festival and whatever it takes to prevent this kind of atrocity from happening again should be done. I've no affiliation with Isreal. I typically do not care about what goes on in the middle east but the mass rape and slaughter of innocents on October 7th caught my attention and the "good guys" were not the ones doing the raping and slaughtering that day, that would be the other side which is in this case Isreal.

There was a ceasefire in place on October 6th. What changed that do you think?

Thai LBs convicted of a crime will be housed in a male prison. They are legally men here even if they have the full operation to remove (or do whatever) with their genitals. In bars I've seen LBs using either and nobody seems to care, but I don't think I've ever seen one using a urinal as they stick to cubicles. It's a bit different over here as LBs (as far as I know) are not asking for 'special' treatment which comes at the expense of women's safety. The concern about males in the west gaining access to female spaces is not a right wing issue, it is a feminist issue and their desire to protect their spaces which traditionally would have been a left wing concern. Somehow this has flipped and anyone who thinks that male rapists should not be accommodated in female prisons or mediocre male athletes should not be competing against women in sport is now "far right". The left only seem to care about the "T" in LGBT and it has been left to the right to argue the case why it is that lesbian women are not being transphobic if they do not want to date women with penises.

No, not really. War is a harsh business at the best of times, and the way Hamas go about this with using civilians as human shields and conducting their operations in hospitals etc makes Hamas the vile creatures here. Hamas are quite happy for their own civilians to be used as collateral damage so they can win the propaganda war and paint Isreal in a bad light. If Hamas cared about their own people they would surrender unconditionally and return the remaining civilian hostages. That is a guaranteed path to a ceasefire. I do not see why I should be required to care more about the citizens of Palestine more than Hamas do. If you actually cared about them then you would be demanding for Hamas to surrender and return the hostages - have you done that? I suspect not as this ongoing conflict gives you an opportunity to express your hatred for Jews/Isreal with impunity.