James105

Literally nobody cares. They were used to take out terrorists with almost zero civilian casualties and did a fine job of it.

The only reason it targets climate protests is that they are the ones committing crimes instead of just peacefully protesting about their nonsense. If they could just hold up their "end of the world is nigh" signs peacefully without obstructing other people as they go about their business they will be just fine.

Except their policies and behaviour are a surprise to everyone. Labour didn't face scrutiny in the build up to the election as the legacy media focused their attention on Reform who were never going to win, so it came as a surprise that Free gear Keir has been on the take from his billionaire sugar daddy in return for what, we don't know yet. Adults don't receive presents "one way" as they are not children so lets call it what it is, a bribe. This is especially galling considering how sanctimonious he has been towards the Tories over the last few years. Also, there was no winter fuel allowance removal on their manifesto so that also came as a surprise. He also said he would freeze energy bills so its coming as a surprise to people they are going up by 10%. Students are next to be surprised I should think if they go ahead with the 13% rise in student fees. So yes, I would say their policies are a surprise. How many of that list above were on their manifesto? None. They obtained power by fraud as if these were manifesto promises and/or his desire for him and his "wife" be bought clothes by sugar daddies had come out earlier I very much doubt they would have received the 33% of the vote that got them into power.

People haven't learnt a thing. They bought the lies that took away their freedoms and caused devastation to the economy, caused countless unnecessary deaths and will do the same next time. Most people are just incredibly susceptible to propaganda, especially the kind that relies on their fear.

The lib dems received less votes than reform.

They owe their victory to the Tories and the freakish nature of the electoral system. Starmer received less votes as leader than Labour did previously under Corbyn. It's fascinating that people give Starmer the credit for happening to be leader of the Labour party when this freak of circumstances occurred but also suggest he bears zero responsibility for being the leader of the CPS when they chose not to prosecute Jiimmy Saville or the Harrods owner - another position he clearly failed at. He should be riding high in the polls with a Tory party without a new leader and the opportunity he has been given but he is tanking. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/sep/28/keir-starmer-hits-new-low-in-personal-popularity-ratings

Every day there is a new story out about the sanctimonious hypocrite. It's not by accident and it most likely is coming from within the Labour party. The rumour is that there is something much bigger being hidden by a super injunction and that is probably being held back to ensure it is released at the most ruinous time. He's already toast I think, just a matter of when, not if.

It's not really wishful thinking though is it as there is no chance of an election to get rid of these clowns for another 4.5 years, and whoever follows this hypocritical tedious clown is going to be worse, probably a lot worse as they are a talentless bunch at best. Apparently the next targets on their list for "those with the broadest shoulders" is going to be the students, with a 13% increase in fees. It's almost as though they are determined to never govern again after seeing out this term.

"the virus was not dangerous to those under 80 and in reasonable health" The majority of those that the virus killed were unhealthy in some way, particularly the obese. Making people stay indoors, closing gyms, parks, turning the NHS into a covid only service has killed more people than doing nothing ever could.

This guy? They were all at it as they all knew the lockdowns were pointless and ineffective, and the virus was not dangerous to those under 80 and in reasonable health. Still, it made the rich richer and the poor poorer so both Labour and Tories were content to support it.

Another modern woman convicted of rape. Women are just not as gentle as they used to be. Much hairier too. Better at sports though. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8rdpdm4r4ro

This is the woman referred to in the article.

So the plane can take off automatically, fly to the destination automatically and land automatically. "Just adding one phase" was the only phase that was left for the pilot to actually do. This is quite reassuring though with the advancements in DEI hiring, so long as DEI hiring is kept away from programming the auto pilot doing the actual flying of the plane.

Yes I've heard this with speculation about fathering a child with his office secretary to a full on gay relationship with the sugar daddy who buys his wifes underwear. Quite intrigued about what it actually is but apparently a super injunction is in place so rumours are all that are available and when the internet is given a chance to speculate... then speculate it does! Whatever it is he is better off getting it out on his terms ahead of it leaking but he is far too weak a man to do so. Labour only choose men as its leaders so it's most likely Steeting or Burhham next I would think.

From the article: "The music streaming site, which is owned by Google, forked out thousands of pounds to accommodate the senior Labour MP, and seemed to get a good return on their money after Labour shelved a proposed hike in the digital service tax from 2 per cent to 10 per cent, which would bring billions in from giants like Google and Facebook. Adam Ramsay, who is currently working on his forthcoming book Abolish Westminster, said: “Literally the day after the festival, it emerged that Reynolds had ditched the policy.” But sure, let's call it "hospitality" as they don't actually have a form for declaring bribes as it might annoy the voters and be illegal. Perhaps the pensioners can start a go fund me to buy Rachel Reeves some tickets for something to get their winter fuel allowance back. Just hospitality mind you, not a bribe, as that would be illegal.

Labour MPs can be bought so, so cheaply. It cost YouTube the price of glastonbury tickets to get Labour to ditch the promised 10% digital service tax hike. https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/labour-ditched-digital-service-tax-hike-after-reynolds-enjoyed-a-free-pass-to-glasto-courtesy-of-youtube-383200/ Not just clowns, but corrupt clowns.

History suggests this will end as badly for Europe as it did for Lebanon.

It's not just the telegraph though is it? Labour have lost: 1. The pensioners 2. The working class 3. The leftists Even the likes of Novara media and Owen Jones are anti-Labour now. According to a times YouGov poll 1 in 7 people who voted for Labour regret doing so. His popularity ratings have already sunk lower than Sunak. Those Labour MPs you cite probably want to stay as MPs for longer than a single term and with such a hypocritical, weak, incompetent, lying grifter of a leader who is trashing Labour's reputation and making the UK a global laughing stock, just how long do you think they will put up with this?

Stop excusing the behaviour of murderous scumbag terrorists. Everyone knows what the problem is and appeasing/excusing them will not save you should you encounter one of them on one of their religious murderous rampages as they try and achieve martyrdom. There is only one problematic religion in this world. All the others are actually "religions of peace".

Anyone see a pattern here: "In 2009, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), then led by Sir Keir Starmer, elected not to prosecute Mr Al Fayed following claims he had sexually assaulted a 15-year-old girl in Harrods." https://www.breakingnews.ie/world/al-fayed-billionaire-whose-alleged-abuse-has-been-under-spotlight-for-years-1674336.html He was a useless in his role in the CPS as he is as PM.

Does pensioner harmer Starmer have different security to previous PMs? Sunak had no security issues when he went to watch football in the stands with the normal folks whilst he was PM: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-12080333/Prime-Minister-Rishi-Sunak-pictured-stands-St-Marys-stadium.html Considering the cost of a box at Arsenal is about £9000 per game the benefits in kind tax will at least cost him a lot. He does pay benefits in kind tax on this like anyone else would, doesn't he?

The clown is a full on grifter: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/sep/18/keir-starmer-100000-in-tickets-and-gifts-more-than-any-other-recent-party-leader £100,000 of free gifts and he takes away the winter fuel allowance from vulnerable pensioners who needed that £300 just to heat their homes and not die of the cold this winter.

They were imprisoned for hurty words. They confessed to making hurty word posts. It doesn't matter what mental gymnastics you put yourself through it is undeniable that they typed some hurty words into facebook and were jailed for it. I think where you are getting yourself turned in knots is that you are expecting to see 'hurty words' in the legislation as though this is a formal term rather than just a colloquialism for Section 127 of the Communications act.

sending a grossly offensive message = hurty words breach of Section 127 of the Communications Act = hurty words They posted hurty words and were jailed for it. They didn't have category A images of 7 year olds on their phones. They didn't physically assault anyone. It's literally hurty words they were jailed for.