James105

If he was Christian we more than likely we already would have been told as this would quickly dispel the rumours that it is yet another Islamic attack. This "not all muslims are murderers line" is getting old now. They call themselves a community, they have their own unelected "community leaders" and they live in a parallel society in the UK. The police are scared of them, the politicians are scared of them, there is a teacher in Batley still in hiding for his life as he committed blasphemy. Lighting candles has not worked. Singing "don't look back in anger" has not worked. Burying heads in the sand, crossing fingers and hoping they integrate into wider society has not worked. What then? Well the UK really needs strong leadership to tackle this powder keg but the UK does not have strong leaders. It has the equivalent of Neville Chamberlain - an appeaser. In the absence of strong leadership then something else will fill that vacuum, and I doubt it will be pretty.

I've had lots of practice of breathing over the years so my judgement of air quality is based on that. Pretty much the same way that I don't need a meteorologist to tell me if it is sunny or not when I can step outside and look for myself. Maybe you don't get out much if you need to be told the air quality from your computer.

Your lack of understanding about why people might be angry about the massacre of 3 innocent little girls is noted. Maybe you want to look up the meaning of catharsis. Besides, all I was really suggesting is that this is yet another example of the 2 tiered law enforcement system in the UK. Would these riots have happened if the Roma Gypsies or the Bangladeshis had felt the "full force of the law" in the past 2 weeks in the same way Starmer has demanded of this one specifically? We'll never know as that didn't happen.

The UK police have taught the people that the only way you get appeasement and your wishes granted is to riot and cause problems. Has anyone in the Leeds riots been arrested or were they appeased and the children handed back despite being taken away for their safety? Did Starmer come out demanding that they face the full force of the law as he has in this case? Have the muslim thugs in Manchester even been charged yet? Have the Bangledeshi rioters faced "the full force of the law", or is the "full force of the law" only used when it is white people expressing their rightful disgust and anger at the killing of 3 innocent girls who were just 6,7 and 9 years old? https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/jul/30/far-right-attack-police-outside-southport-mosque-after-knife-killings Maybe this is the point where the people of the UK do actually stand up and say enough is enough.

I lived in Chiang mai for a while. The air is almost unbreathable from about February to May, and fine for the rest of the year. The air pollution from burning the fields is why I left and would have stayed there if not for that. Vehicle pollution is completely insignificant in comparison.

Labour lie about "finding" a hole in publicly available books shocker. £3bn of taxpayers money given to Ukraine £9.6bn given to public sector workers on inflation busting pay rise. I imagine a significant portion of the 1 in 5 of the electorate that actually voted for Labour will already be feeling a lot of voter regret right now. Only 4 years and 48 weeks to go until that mistake can be corrected, but who knows what damage these clowns will cause by then. Not even the "nasty party" took away the winter fuel allowance from some of the most vulnerable in society.

Since the attacker is 17 that means no-one will know his name (officially) until after he has been found guilty and convicted by the courts. Only then can he be named by the Judge, and that is only if the judge decides to do so. Since we won't know his name, we won't know the parents names either, or what religion they are inclined to follow, or even if he really was born in Cardiff. So the narrative is whatever they want it to be.

The question is, at what point do the people of the UK say that they have had their fill of cultural enrichment and say enough is enough. In just the last few weeks: - Riots in leeds (Roma Gypsies) - Bangladeshi riots in Whitechapel - Solder stabbed in Kent (Islam) - Muslim men attacking armed police in Manchester - Multiple children attacked with knives in Southport (attacker origin currently withheld for all the obvious reasons) RIP to the kids that were killed and hope the ones that are critical make it.

When I saw the headline I already knew what the source would be. Absolute jokers. Future headline prediction from that same "newspaper": Why only straight white men should be sent to prison

It's a consequence of "man bites dog" style of reporting. It's so rare to see the police doing anything other than appeasing certain "communities" that when they act in response to the violence meted upon them they get vilified in the media, and the perpetrators of the violence that caused the response get treated as the victims they pretend to be.

The defendants were already found guilty when he was recording so there was no chance of mistrial. Ask yourself this: How many journalists do you think have been found in contempt of court for "possibly" causing a mistrial and how many have been given a 9 month sentence in a category A prison for doing so? Lots of journalists have found themselves in the same position and have been given fines e.g https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-18350615 , but none have been sent to jail for this, and being sent to the same prison as rapist and murderers for a 'contempt of court' charge is absolutely ridiculous. The law is not applied evenly in the UK and the state has a real problem with white working class individuals speaking their minds. People on the left are more upset that Robinson is talking about asian grooming gangs raping children than the fact that asian grooming gangs were raping children, and were allowed to do with impunity so because the police, politicians, mainstream journalists (mostly) are too scared to act.

This article is about the west and its self destructive path to impoverish itself with its hare brained net zero policies, which will only serve to make the rich richer and the poor poorer, whilst making not one iota of difference to the climate. Thailand is not on this path.

Cutting fossil fuel subsidies would put the price fluctuations back on the consumer as that is what they are there for. Many old people who could not afford to heat their homes in winter would die. So then you say "lets give the people some money to heat their homes in winter then" and you are back to square 1 as you would be subsidising the fossil fuels again.

Attacking the messenger is a common tactic among those who are unable to make a cohesive argument against the content of the message.

Abuse? His crime was saying "well done girls" to 2 girls, one of whom is currently pretending to be a boy and if allowed to get through puberty and grow up into adulthood would likely be a happy and fulfilled adult human female, just like the many thousands, maybe millions of girls who used to be 'tomboys' in a time when confused teenagers were not indoctrinated into the trans cult. Anyway, would be interesting to see the judges response and lefties response should this ever occur to a teacher of a certain different religion who never seem to be considered to have perverse and outdated views due to the bigotry of low expectations. He would be in fear of his life if he tried that kind of summation with a certain religion.

Did he pull his gun out? Did he shoot the thug? Since the answer to both those questions is no then he did well in my opinion. Unless you are a beta male then you don't know how you will react when seeing a female colleagues face get smashed by a thug. Have you experienced UK police firearms training to be able to state from experience that they are "heavily trained" to deal with their emotions or is that just something you made up?

The problem with London is that only 2 types of people can "afford" to live there: 1. People who have zero skills or aspiration that get their housing free of charge thanks to the taxpayer. 2. People who are actually rich enough to live there. I'm guessing here but my guess is that the first group are the ones causing the most amount of trouble. It's a shame that the middle class hard workers were mostly priced out of London as it really used to be a great place to live.

Did the 5% grow up in rape friendly violent cultures before migrating to London? Lack of opportunities in... London?? Seriously?

You don't have the full context. You have only seen a teeny fraction of the altercation and just because someone "says" he stamped on his head does not make it so. He actually stamped to the side of his head. Also the fact the thug was not unconscious and looked somewhat okay in comparison to the female police officer then actual kick to the head suggests it was more of a warning that an attempt to cause serious injury.

It's only complicated if you think it is a problem that can only be solved with hugs and non-punitive measures. Increase stop and search for the "communities" who commit the most crimes, zero tolerance even for first offences and extremely punitive punishments would go a long way to reducing this. Appeasement continues to be a non working strategy.

I am fairly confident that when she gets lung cancer she will be blaming people driving their cars for this and not the 100s of harmful toxic chemicals in that cigarette, such is the insane level of brainwashing that has infected her mind.

I didn't say it was "OK" I was implying that it is understandable. It's human nature for males to be protective of females (not beta males obviously as they do not have this instinct so are the ones most outraged by this), so if a thug attacks a female in the presence of other males then it would be expected that the thug would find out that this is not acceptable behaviour. It looks bad, but taken in the context of his female colleague getting her face smashed in then it is understandable.

I hope this officer gets the benefit of context for this as I don't think I would be able to control my temper either if some thug was smashing a female colleague's face in. Actions have consequences and if the guy on the ground was found to have caused previous bodily harm to a female then the sympathies should not be with the thug that took the kick to the head.

It's weird how you don't even need to see their photos to already know exactly what they are going to look like.