James105

It raises concerns about his judgement as this affects the safety and security of British people so it doesn't matter if it affected the end result. This was a flight full of convicted criminals who were not British citizens and any non British citizen who is given a custodial sentence of 12 months or more is automatically deported. If the safety and security of citizens is a governments number one priority then I'd say his judgement based on this event is a major concern - wouldn't you? Everyone who campaigned would at least in part have influenced the result of the judges verdict on this so they all have blood on their hands for the murder that was committed by one of the criminals they helped get off the plane and back onto British streets.

From the article: "Sir Keir campaigned alongside MPs and celebs to cancel a major deportation flight - but some have gone on to re-offend." They were criminals who were not British nationals and it should have been an automatic deportation as they had all spent more than 12 months in jail. One of them went on to murder someone thanks in part to the actions of the woke idiot who is now running the country.

...and Sir Kneel Starmer will ensure they stay in the UK. He was part of the group of woke idiots who helped stop a deportation flight full of criminals, and one of those he stopped being deported went on to murder someone with a machete. https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1749812/keir-starmer-criminals-jamaica-deport-crimes The guy is a moron.

The problem Labour have here is they will not be able to obtain victory in a referendum by just getting 34% of the vote share here as there is only 2 choices. This makes it tricky for them as in a referendum everyones vote counts. Labour have form for signing treaties with the EU without a mandate from the people so you may well get your wish anyway, such is the "democratic" system in the UK. I am fully expecting the UK to be once again in the single market and signed up to freedom of movement, probably paying even more into the EU trough, but with even less say than we did before within 5 years. I do not expect that the people will get a say in this.

That is patently false. The majority of people who voted did not vote for Labour as they received only 34% of the vote of a 59% turnout. Maths is somewhat difficult for you I presume?

I was responding to a post that suggested that people voted for this and it is factually correct to state that 20% of people voted for it. If you read the post I was responding to you will work it out... eventually.

20% of the electorate voted for this. 80% didn't.

Yes yes I have saw that amnesty that is not called an amnesty. What extra powers do the extra 1000 police have though to "tackle the people smugglers"? Will these 1000 extra police be heading across to France to "smash the people smuggling gangs" and do they have the power to arrest people in France? If not, what is the point as it just sounds like just another way to waste money on not solving a problem that Australia has already proven is not that difficult to solve.

Do these extra 1000 police have the powers to arrest people in France then? Now I do not wish to question the undoubted intelligence of the new home secretary, but from what I understand is that the people smugglers do not travel on the dinghy's to the UK and remain in France which makes it slightly tricky for the UK police officers to arrest them. Seems the new policy seems to be the same as the old policy, minus Rwanda. Quelle surprise.

Both tories and labour are clowns and it is no surprise they share the same polices as there is no difference between them. There is a very simple solution for not enough prison spaces as most prisoners are allocated a single person cell in the UK. Prisoner comfort should not be a high priority and if they don't like it they can always make better life choices when they are released, preferably after serving their full sentence. It's weird how as the levels of immigration have massively increased we start running out of prison spaces though. Must be a coincidence I guess.

Another pea brained size decision. Unless the UK suddenly reduces its energy usage then this energy needs to come from somewhere. Does any "climate expert" on here know why it is better for "the climate" to import the energy from other countries at an inflated cost than consuming their own?

Flat earthers believe the earth is flat despite the overwhelming evidence that the earth is not flat. Those that are skeptical of "man made" global warming are skeptical due the underwhelming evidence that climate change is caused by human activities and isn't due to a great ball of fire that is 1.3 million times the size of earth, and struggle to understand how exporting emissions from the UK to India or China (at great expense) is somehow going to solve the problem.

"The past year has seen an average global temperature 1.64C higher than the pre-industrial average and 0.76C above the 1991-2020 average." Hmmm. Wonder how this compares to the 1930s and why that decade is never mentioned in these "record" temperatures as that decade was (in)famously hot. The periods selected here seem to be "pre-industrial" (which I assume to be pre 1850) and 1991-2020. Seems very selective to me. Wonder why?

People who typically support immigration are those that are unaffected by the consequences of it. Labour have promised (although not in manifesto) an equal distribution of the illegal immigrants around the country so everyone has to take their "fair share". So those who are currently unaffected by it will have to face up to the prospect of large groups of men hanging around their previously white neighborhoods. The level of "voter regret" from the 20% of the electorate that did vote for labour will be off the charts before long, especially when they also release thousands of convicted prisoners (again not in manifesto) early from their sentences as they are suggesting they will do. Weird how these things that were not included in their manifesto come up just days after being elected.

Maggie summed up this nonsense quite nicely:

I'm sure once Palestine returns the hostages they took on Oct 7th they will be able to pursue the peace they crave don't want with their neighbors more easily. In the meantime the UK is not in the middle east and maybe the new UK government should be focusing on UK issues as their priority.

This is one of my favourites.

Indeed. Doesn't seem quite so impressive when looking at this chart.

Keep burying your head in the the same sand that Labours government is built upon. The warning signs are very clear and very loud. Denmark showed the only way to tackle the right wing is to cut off their oxygen by listening to the voters on their concerns like immigration and then acting on it. Labour will do exactly what I expect them to do, which is pander to the shouty activists on TikTok who demand open borders and ignore all those people that voted for them and all those that did not, probably even using derogatory terms (such as right-wing wingnut) when they are unable to come up with any kind of coherent argument against their points.

I don't think so. If Labour do not tackle Islamism (which of course they will not), then they can expect to haemorrhage their entire muslim vote to muslim candidates. These people are Islam first. Even if Labour appease them (and they will appease them) and feed them benefits they can expect to get their hands well and truly bitten by this community.

What hardball questions did he have to face on QT about the policies in the reform manifesto? I don't recall any. Maybe if the legacy media actually asked him about any of their policies then you would get the detail you pretend to care about. "Moreover his policy positions are favorable to the continuing consolidation of wealth and power in the hands of the hyper wealthy." Do you have an example of how raising the limit of when people start paying tax to £20K, removing student debt from medical professionals and freezing net immigration "consolidates wealth and power in the hands of the hyper wealthy" or did your left wing media overlord not go into that kind of detail when feeding you your "Farage talking points"?

I expected the result. I don't want either of the members of the Uniparty governing the UK as they are both signed up to the same agenda. I was just merely pointing out that Labour should be concerned about Reform as when they let the 20% of people that voted for them down (as well as the 80% of people that did not vote for them), then they are heading for an almighty fall. The main reasons that people voted Labour are: To get rid of the Tories - 48% The country needs a change - 13% Agree with Labour policies - 5% https://ygo-assets-websites-editorial-emea.yougov.net/documents/Copy_of_YouGov_Lab_why_VI_21_June_-_1_July_2024_SL.pdf Just 5% voted Labour for their policies. Its a house of cards that is destined to come crashing down after just a single term unless they do listen to the likes of Farage, who is far more in tune with the people of the UK than Sir Kneel Starmer who seems to blow in whatever direction the shouty blue haired idiots on TikTok tell him to.

The going rate of net zero is about £1.4 trillion according to the office of budget responsibility. https://www.ft.com/content/b02b9d51-3e0c-435c-9b53-774ee12ea277 Globalism (at least how I use it) means that the UK politicians act for and on behalf of "team world" rather than "team UK".

I'd suggest it starts with some fairly basic maths. How much does net zero cost and considering it is just a way of exporting emissions to another country what is the benefit?

The globalist establishment UniParty (Con+Lab) only secured 55% of the votes this time and is massively down from previous years - down from 76% in 2019 and down from 82% in 2017. Change is coming. Not as fast as I'd like but I do consider this to be progress. Hopefully this trend continues into the next election and Labour gets a similar kicking after people wake up to the fact that individual nations cannot achieve real growth when following the globalist agendas of Net Zero and mass immigration.