James105

Putin nailed it.

You are doing the hoping. I'm just stating facts.

Do you know this with 100% certainty? If so how and can you post a link that shows what the alleged "murderer" has been doing in the years since his appearance for the "children in need" Doctor who on BBC when he was 10 years old? The simple fact is that no-one knows the motives yet, and until they do they will speculate, just as you are doing by claiming it has nothing to do with Islam even though you cannot be 100% sure that is the case.

Yes, it certainly appears that way. Maybe I was just being overly optimistic that they would just turn into Blair's Labour and start a few wars, (only) double legal and illegal immigration, raise a few taxes and destroy the economy before someone with some economic sense would take over next time whilst there was still something to take over from. There will be no honest or difficult conversations about why there is such dissatisfaction in the UK and why people are taking to the streets. They will just continue to point at pantomime villains like Farage and Robinson saying it is all their fault, whilst silencing anyone who speaks out. I remember reading Peter Hitchins virtually begging people to vote for Tories (even though he detests them at every level) to prevent Labour from getting into power as he recognised how dangerous Labour (Starmer specifically) are, but it was an impossible ask due to their epic failures whilst in government.

Quelle surprise. Labour MP outraged that people can see content that is not pre-approved by the government. We are just 4 weeks into this Labour government. 4 weeks. I knew they would be bad, but I didn't foresee just how dangerous they would be when they gained power.

Fascinating that women pretending to be men compete in the women's category and men pretending to be women also compete in the women's category. This "modern man" clearly doesn't feel the need to have "his" own category and is content to compete in the correct category. Why can't men pretending to be women follow "his" example?

BBC, Morning star and Guardian?

I see. So you prefer to read news reports based on the edited version of those videos of these events so someone else can form your opinion for you.

Men cannot give birth. This is very basic stuff.

It's called "safeguarding". It doesn't mean that everyone is a predator, it just means that all "practical" steps are taken to prevent (for example) a predatory male in a dress using female changing rooms. It doesn't mean all men who wear dresses are predatory. Obviously separating gay men from straight men in toilets or changing rooms is not practical, but straight men are not in danger from gay men (even predatory ones) in the same way that females are.

I'm not sure if this is just pure stupidity or something more sinister. Not only did he not mention that Muslims in balaclavas are attacking white people but he singled them out for protection, as well as spending another £30m of taxpayers money to "protect" mosques. Has he forgotten that he is PM and is supposed to lead the country and not just the Muslim community? All he had to say was we will not tolerate attacks on "ANY" community. It's as though he has a manual on "how to start a civil war" and is going through it step by step.

Enoch Powell Rachel Reeves predicted this would happen back in 2016: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/rachel-reeves-brexit-immigration-labour-mp-riots-uk-conference-speech-a7334266.html

You won't hear about it on the BBC of course, nor will it be discussed in the Cobra meeting (of course) but there is Muslim Defence League now.

He is a 2nd generation immigrant. His parents came from a very different culture. Where do kids get their values from do you think?

Christ on a bike. It's like conversing with an NPC. In 2010, 2015, 2016 (Brexit), 2019 people voted for the party/solution that promised control of the borders and reduced immigration. Ergo: "When the people did vote to reduce immigration it was ignored and accelerated".

Since you ask, then 1st or 2nd generation immigrants slaughtering innocent little girls ranks quite highly on my outrage meter. I'd include native British people on that list but since it hasn't happened for quite some time I don't know how I would actually feel about it, but I am pretty sure that would also rank highly on the outrage meter.

Where did I say it increased since the election? I said "When the people did vote to reduce immigration it was ignored and accelerated". I've put the important word in bold for you. Hope that helps.

What does that have to do with leftist clowns comparing Tommy Robinson to Hitler and Mussolini for not calling for violence as they also on occasions did not call for violence?

If the rioting gets bad enough then maybe the illegal immigrants will start taking small rubber boats back to France for their safety and the French can start paying the UK to stop dinghies leaving the beaches at Dover whilst the UK Border police just wave them on. I guess Labour being such incompetent clowns who just 4 weeks into their government have managed to rile people up so much they are rioting could well act as a deterrent so maybe you are onto something here.

1 in 5 people voted for Labour. 4 out of 5 did not. When the people did vote to reduce immigration it was ignored and accelerated. There is no democratic mandate for mass immigration of over a million people a year. There never has been. I'm surprised it has taken this long for the people to say enough is enough.

Here is left wing guardian columnist Paul Mason getting angry about Tommy Robinson not calling for violence and comparing him to both Hitler and Mussolini as there were also times that they also did not call for violence. How does anyone ever take the left seriously? They are absolute clowns.

Stating that makes you "far right" in leftist parlance. The people have tried the democratic approach with regards to controlling immigration for the past 14 years, consistently voting for the party that kept making promises that immigration would be reduced to a more manageable level of tens of thousands per year. Not only was this ignored, but it was actively accelerated against the wishes of the people. There has never been a mandate to fundamentally make such a drastic change to the country. So the people have tried the democratic approach and it failed, and what happens when democracy fails? Probably something like we are seeing. People have been warning about this for many, many years and every single time they were labelled as far right and racist in order to shut down any debate on this. I'm surprised people are surprised by what is happening.

You complain about people speculating then go on to speculate how he could be the victim in all this. You are ignoring the most obvious possibility as well, and based on how quiet they are being about motives is probably the most likely. Stop making this monster out to be the victim. He slaughtered and killed 3 innocent girls and stabbed many others before he was stopped.

"Fixed?" 3 little girls were butchered in cold blood. They are dead. They cannot be "fixed".

He does look like a normal kid. Of course he does. You are being shown what they want you to see and for some reason they want you to see him like this and not the monster that butchered 3 little girls. They don't want you to see: 1. What he looks like now. 2. What happened in the intervening years. 3. Whether or not he was radicalized and if so by who. Hint: It's probably not the "far right" or a Christian priest. Why is that do you think?