James105

Since you ask, then 1st or 2nd generation immigrants slaughtering innocent little girls ranks quite highly on my outrage meter. I'd include native British people on that list but since it hasn't happened for quite some time I don't know how I would actually feel about it, but I am pretty sure that would also rank highly on the outrage meter.

Where did I say it increased since the election? I said "When the people did vote to reduce immigration it was ignored and accelerated". I've put the important word in bold for you. Hope that helps.

What does that have to do with leftist clowns comparing Tommy Robinson to Hitler and Mussolini for not calling for violence as they also on occasions did not call for violence?

If the rioting gets bad enough then maybe the illegal immigrants will start taking small rubber boats back to France for their safety and the French can start paying the UK to stop dinghies leaving the beaches at Dover whilst the UK Border police just wave them on. I guess Labour being such incompetent clowns who just 4 weeks into their government have managed to rile people up so much they are rioting could well act as a deterrent so maybe you are onto something here.

1 in 5 people voted for Labour. 4 out of 5 did not. When the people did vote to reduce immigration it was ignored and accelerated. There is no democratic mandate for mass immigration of over a million people a year. There never has been. I'm surprised it has taken this long for the people to say enough is enough.

Here is left wing guardian columnist Paul Mason getting angry about Tommy Robinson not calling for violence and comparing him to both Hitler and Mussolini as there were also times that they also did not call for violence. How does anyone ever take the left seriously? They are absolute clowns.

Stating that makes you "far right" in leftist parlance. The people have tried the democratic approach with regards to controlling immigration for the past 14 years, consistently voting for the party that kept making promises that immigration would be reduced to a more manageable level of tens of thousands per year. Not only was this ignored, but it was actively accelerated against the wishes of the people. There has never been a mandate to fundamentally make such a drastic change to the country. So the people have tried the democratic approach and it failed, and what happens when democracy fails? Probably something like we are seeing. People have been warning about this for many, many years and every single time they were labelled as far right and racist in order to shut down any debate on this. I'm surprised people are surprised by what is happening.

You complain about people speculating then go on to speculate how he could be the victim in all this. You are ignoring the most obvious possibility as well, and based on how quiet they are being about motives is probably the most likely. Stop making this monster out to be the victim. He slaughtered and killed 3 innocent girls and stabbed many others before he was stopped.

"Fixed?" 3 little girls were butchered in cold blood. They are dead. They cannot be "fixed".

He does look like a normal kid. Of course he does. You are being shown what they want you to see and for some reason they want you to see him like this and not the monster that butchered 3 little girls. They don't want you to see: 1. What he looks like now. 2. What happened in the intervening years. 3. Whether or not he was radicalized and if so by who. Hint: It's probably not the "far right" or a Christian priest. Why is that do you think?

Still got those reading comprehension difficulties I see.

Yes, correct. If it does exist it is not organised and lives in the shadows. In comparison to other types of much bigger problems in the UK (e.g Islamic terror threat) it is insignificant. It's a convenient boogeyman to distract from the real problems though, and for those that lack any critical thinking skills it is their "go to" monster that avoids the uncomfortable topic of the utter failure of "multiculturalism".

Do you have reading comprehension difficulties? Where and when did I say the "right wing" doesn't exist.

Good for them. Any photos of the Harehills locals doing the same after their riots or did they leave it to the council?

This issue is going to set back the "trans women are women" movement back a bit. All sorts of confused leftists are now able to define what was a previously impossible question for non-biologists which is "what is a woman?". We also have people claiming birth certificates are confirmatory documents that someone is a woman and actual descriptions of what a woman is. This should make it a lot easier to define who should be allowed to compete in women's sports as we can simply check the birth certificate. Kind of like it used to be.

"police vehicles were set on fire". Are you trying to get a job at CNN?

12 year olds do not get life imprisonment, no matter how heinous the crime. Jon Venables, one of the two 10 year olds that tortured and killed two year old Jamie Bulger served just 8 years in jail for this crime, so was 18 years old when he was released.

I can answer these!!! 7. Things that do not exist have no sense of humour. 8. Things that do not exist do not get upset.

The imaginary and mythical "far right" klaxon! Since you are sharing links about understanding the "far right" lets see if you can answer some simple questions about the "far right": 1. Are the "far right" stabbing and murdering kids? 2. Do the "far right" make up 90% of the MI5 terrorist watchlist? 3. Do the "far right" blow up buses and concerts? 4. Are the "far right" mass grooming white girls? 5. Are the "far right" roaming the streets with machetes? 6. Are the "far right" in the room with you now?

So you agree that you don't know their politics either then, so perhaps you should stop spreading the falsehoods that you do by labelling them as such.

I don't know the politics of people angry about 3 little girls being massacred. I would assume that both left and right wing voters would be angered about 3 little girls being senselessly murdered. Do I have that wrong?

So it sounds like we finally have a definition for a woman now and can now draw a line under this and let women have their sports back?

You make a good point. Unfortunately precedent has been set that in order for people to be listened to and get what they want then rioting is the way as was demonstrated in the BLM riots and the Harehills riots more recently. It's a shame that those who are the most vociferous now about the white people expressing their anger and rioting were so, so quiet when it was other ethnicities doing so. It's hard to take anyone seriously who have such obvious double standards, up to and including the PM who actually bent the knee to the BLM rioters.

Just stating a fact. I can't help it if you don't like facts and the fact is there is no EDL any more. Yes, there was violence in Southport. People were rightly angry that someone (again either a 1st or 2nd generation immigrant) killed 3 little girls. Starmer, because he is an out of touch moron, instead of expressing any kind of understanding of the root cause of that anger decided he would light the touch paper and add fuel to the anger. Let me educate you on the "far right" as this is a very specific political ideology that promotes racial supremacy, genocide, neo-nazism and fascism. The British people detest the "far right" and sacrificed so much to defeat it in the 1940s. It is not "far right" to be angry that 3 little girls were killed. False information can be defeated very easily with factual information and speculation is still rife about the motives of the attacker as showing photos of an innocent looking 10 year old choir boy who did an appearance on the BBC for (ironically) children in need are just fuelling even more conspiracies that the real motives are being covered up.

Not sure if you have just woken up from cryo-sleep so let me get you up to date. The EDL was disbanded in 2013. There is no EDL.