James105

Rightly so. Do you think you should be able to remain in Thailand if you are convicted for shoplifting here? This person spent 6 months in jail and deported for doing precisely that. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/thai-prison-shoplifting_n_5c51e314e4b0ca92c6dc9c81

So they didn't even have the wherewithal or the common sense to ask about accommodation yet we are calling these "skilled" workers? Right.

I do find it quite amusing that the schoolboy activists (Labour party) now have to deal with Trump after so many years of calling him names, trying to get him banned from visiting the UK, sending over Labour activists to interfere with their elections etc. The chickens are coming home to roost. If they were not sixth from children then they would simply ask Nigel Farage to do this job as he is clearly (by some distance) the best person to manage the relationship with the US whilst Trump is in office.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2kv2nvj1eo Amreaz Asghar, 47, jailed for 4 years 6 months for rape Perwaz Asghar, 50, - 6 years 6 months for two indecent assaults Mohammed Din, 47, - 14 years for 11 counts of rape ajid Mahmood Khan, 45, - 3 years for rape Zehroon Razak, 47, - 6 years, 6 months for rape Ibrar Hussain, 47, - 5.5 years for rape Imtiaz Ahmed, 62 - 9 years but has fled the country Fayaz Ahmed, 45 -7 years but has fled the country In other news, Andrew McIntyre was jailed for 7.5 years for making some very unpleasant social media posts which somehow is considered a crime worthy of a longer sentence than raping a child in most cases in comparison to the above.

Looks like today's effort by Labour to further antagonize the British people has been accomplished. How much more the people of the UK can take of this is a unknown but it has to be getting close to boiling point. I don't think even the UK, which is probably the most patient, tolerant country in the world can handle much more of this.

Yes, tens of thousands but the numbers are always going to be estimates due to leftist nonces covering up the crimes so that these girls could be raped with impunity. We do know that there were at least 1400 known victims in Rotherham and 1000+ in Telford. These rape gangs were operating in 50+ towns. Do the maths. You realise when something is covered up (as it so obviously has in this case) then it is difficult to get the true number... right?

Except that's not how it works at all. Here is the current racist advert for internships at MI5 in the UK that allows everyone to apply except white people. https://www.mi5.gov.uk/careers/opportunities/internships

The UK is sending £133 million in foreign aid to Pakistan this year. It is not even spending 10% of that amount on an inquiry in the UK into why Pakistani men were able to rape tens of thousands of little English girls with impunity that was covered up by left leaning councils, police and social workers.

They managed to find £117 million to "protect mosques" following the brutal slaying of little girls in a Taylor Swift dance class, but can only spare £5 million to investigate the industrial scale rape of children by Pakistani men with impunity due to the cover up by those same councils they now want to put in charge of investigating themselves? Every single day Labour find a way to antagonize the British people. Are they just nonces themselves and see nothing wrong with little girls being raped or is there a more sinister agenda here?

He simply hates the UK and it's citizens. I've no idea what his end goal is but if civil war and destruction of the UK is the goal then he is certainly on the right track to doing so. He wakes up every single day with a goal of finding some new way to anger UK citizens and every day he is achieving that goal.

Not allowing people who do not actually buy their products in their stores is unlikely to affect them financially for reasons that are too obvious to describe.

Telling Africans to go back to Africa? Bit racist.

They receive free hotels. That is a benefit. They receive free money (called financial support in full disinformation fact). That is a benefit. They receive free healthcare. That is a benefit. If they received none of those things the UK would be a much less appealing country for illegal immigrants.

Lots of people have suggested improvements and Reeves could easily fix this if she wasn't blinded by leftist ideology. I referenced a tweet that Ben Habib posted with basic common sense measures that could be taken: Ditch net zero - save £50 billion per annum Slash benefits for 3 million people not even looking for a job - save £30 billion a year Eliminate benefits for foreigners - save £10 to £15 billion per annum Mass deportation of all illegals migrants - save a minimum of £10 billion per annum Sack half the civil service - save a minimum of £8 billion per annum That’s over £100 billion per annum saving Slash regulations on business. Slash taxes on SMEs, working and middle classes, employment Slash corporation tax Stop cheap imported labour Implement those measures and the UK will experience a golden age of unprecedented growth and prosperity.

There is also no evidence that he instructed staff not to prosecute Jimmy Saville. The "it didn't come across my desk" excuse is starting to wear a bit thin and he is either incredibly incompetent or is complicit in this. Neither is a good look. We both know that if someone motivated (such as the likes of Tommy Robinson) was in charge of the CPS and it wasn't a leftist content to plant their head in the sand when it comes to muslims and the atrocities they commit then tens of thousands of rapes of young underage girls could and would have been prevented.

The free hotels, free money and free NHS are all benefits that illegal immigrants receive. Stop peddling misinformation.

Something like this...

He may have eventually, begrudgingly done so but only years after the likes of Tommy Robinson and others were shouting from the rooftops that this was happening. If someone like Robinson was head of CPS then tens of thousands of brutal rapes of children would have been prevented. I'm sure if Jimmy Saville had lived for another decade he would have eventually, begrudgingly prosecuted him too.

No, they cannot and should not mark their own homework. Social workers, councillers, police, MPs have all been complicit in the cover up of tens of thousands of brutal rapes of underage girls. Everyone knows now that these crimes were covered up and in some instances the fathers of the girls being raped were arrested when they complained to the police. How many of those in authority have been held to account or are in jail for their part in this cover up? Zero. That is how many.

Seems to me he is highlighting the failure of the state to protect thousands of underage girls from being brutally raped. The fact that Labour are trying everything they can to stop Musk from speaking about this suggests they have a lot to hide and are indeed complicit. Being the stupid morons that they are means that all they achieve by this is that Musk's voice is amplified even more due to the Streisand effect.

So they are linked to profligate spending then. The idiot ex customer services rep has wasted tens of billions on pay rises for public sector buddies without asking for productivity improvements, given Mad Ed Milliband tens of billions to spaff away on net zero idiocy and other wasteful spending and has net zero plans for growth to cover this expenditure after implementing an anti-growth budget. Her options now are to raise taxes which will cause growth to go backwards even further into recession or to cut spending as the markets see a Labour government as high risk so want higher interest rates for borrowing. Are you ready to admit that it is not looking very good and even the Tory morons were better than this clown show?

Another Labour nonce (former Labour MP) called Ivor Caplin has just been caught in a pedophile sting operation trying to have sex with a 15 year old boy. https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/former-labour-mp-arrested-during-paedophile-sting-months-after-suspended/ We all know why they don't want an investigation into this as they are so obviously complicit in the mass rape of underage girls all across the country.

I don't think she had a choice. The banks actions backed her into a corner and firing the chancellor was a last ditch effort to try and put confidence back in the markets. I'm still irritated by this as at least she was a conservative (an actual one in the conservative party which is as rare as hens teeth nowadays) but the establishment did not want an actual conservative as PM. The follow on from this is the Tories went back into Lib dem mode of mass immigration to grow the economy which the country are sick of and in turn led to the election of the clowns we have now.

They have lied about everything else they promised to get into power, so whats just another lie by increasing taxes? Rachel from accounts has jetted off to China no doubt to see how they manage to keep growing their economy, whilst they chuckle behind her back thinking of course you cannot grow your economy you absolute moron as you have made energy the most expensive on the planet. China of course continuing to build coal-fired power stations to give them the cheap energy that undercuts the rest of the market - hence growth. Starmer meanwhile has put himself in a sticky position as Reeves has to be fired so another chancellor can be put in place and give confidence to the markets, but he made such a big ceremony of her making history by being the first female chancellor he is going to look even more of a moron (if that is possible) when she becomes the first female chancellor to be fired from the job. Also, Labour didn't have anyone qualified to be chancellor in the first place so had to promote that girl from customer services. Are they allowed to use someone from another party as chancellor or does it have to be a Labour politician? I believe Farage has some experience in the banking sector so would be a good candidate for the job.

I support the same club and yes everyone knows who it is so its silly not to mention his name. He cannot be punished for something he hasn't been charged with though and it shouldn't be down to the club to punish him for something he hasn't been charged with either. He should have retained full anonymity (at the same level as the accuser) and no-one should know who it is at this stage. Once his name was made public they should have sold him to a Saudi club really. That fact that didn't happen makes me assume that the club believe he has a good case to prove his innocence over this as I doubt they would tarnish their own reputation if he did not.