Bruno123

Just now, roietfortress said:

you tried the Lampang farm?

 

https://www.facebook.com/บ้านครูสมุนไพร-104109811346576

 

their GC is legit (in my opinion). here's a pic of it after getting out of the bag for 2 days and into a canister. i'd suggest ordering the 100g bags. i think that is their standard for storage. the 50g bag wasn't sealed.

 

 

That's from where I tried it. 

19 minutes ago, philthebook said:

I haven't managed to find any nice green crack yet (all been flattened buds with not a great smell), tried 4 or 5 different GC suppliers so far.

I just don't think it's a nice strain here. Though some seem to like it, so perhaps just a matter of personal taste.

2 hours ago, dhupverg said:

Wasn't this thead about "cheapest good weed" and not "cheapest weed"?  I keep seeing some posters saying this thread is about cheap weed, when actually it's about cheapest good weed.

 

Of course the balloon chasers can open up a cheapest weed thread, as well as the high end smokers can open a " best weed" thread.  Photos and feedback of what was purchased, how it looked, and how it smoked and worked would be great for each thread.  Source of anything good would also be appreciated by most board members.

 

One last thing, I have to say thanks to the poster that put up a twitter link.  There's something for everyone there.

https://twitter.com/hashtag/กัญชา?f=live

 

Your post would have been totally useless if you hadn't included someone else's link within.

How else would they know if it is good if they don't buy it and try it? Does it have to be expensive to be good?

Why not wait to post until you have something of value to add, other than just re-posting someone else's link?

4 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Almost reads like you are mocking a persons disability. nice

Pathetic..... clutching at straws.

^^

Now, instead of refuting my post with facts, they have taken to posting utter nonsense and playing with icons.

Come on guys, is this the best you can do? It's like trying to have an adult discussion with children. Maybe time to get your crayons out if you cannot do adult.

On 8/15/2022 at 5:03 AM, Chivas said:

This one still works but speed is throttled after 1gb but is for 30 days and ideal for social media etc email messaging etc

Truemove

*900*1801# and then "call"

 

199 Baht plus vat

 

I have little doubt there are better ones that people are aware of but for reasons unknown they simply refuse to share

I know you already picked up a relevant code in this thread. Just another example of your behaviour.....

22 minutes ago, JimmyJ said:

Yes, just doublechecked. 

 

Unlimited 15 minute calls to any network.

 

Very helpful, thanks again!

Nice ???? 

4 minutes ago, JimmyJ said:

Turns out the DTAC code is still good.

 

Thank you!

I hope you chose the code with free calls ????

On 8/2/2022 at 9:26 AM, Bruno123 said:

If still working, the code for new DTAC SIM and applying 15 Mbps plus free calls to any network, is *104*577*9# 200 baht per month.

 

But again, no guarantees that it will be working by the time you want to use it.

46 minutes ago, roietfortress said:

yea its fine. Lampang goes well with this thread. i'm not impressed with the OG Kush. its leafy and doesn't seem the 18% THC they quoted us on Line. i dried a bud overnight and it was pretty lame. the GC is great tho. mad head rush and then an energy ride for about 2 hours. i'll order more of it. The GC is 180/g for 100g. 

 

oh bonus - i found 3 seeds in the first big GC bud i broke up. they are already in water.

I guess you meant 18 baht per gram for 100 grams.

7 hours ago, billd766 said:

I ran more speed tests this morning after physically disconnecting my lan cable. With the vpn selected or not it made no difference.

 

There was a very small improvement but nowhere the speeds I should be getting.

 

I have tried downloading a new set of drivers from 2 different sites and while they reported 24 drivers from 613 need updating, unless I paid them they would not update the drivers.

 

It is Tuesday afternoon and as I will be up in Kamphaeng Phet anyway on Thursday I will drop the pc off at the shop I bought it from and let them sort it out.

 

Thank you to all of you who gave helpful advice, and to the poster who called me a troll, thank you for nothing.

elfpattaya gave you good advice. You, as usual, rudely chose to ignore it, as you did mine more than a year ago.

If the other people who tried to help you were aware of the fact that your device has not had a update since September 2020(according to you), they might have saved wasting their time looking for other solutions. Some would consider that Trolling them.

You of course, see it in your own special way.

Hopefully the shop will fix your corrupt install of Windows 10 and you can go back to your blissful existence.

Anyone else else looking, will do better making an effort to ask for new SIM promos. All networks are offering unlimited data @ 15 Mbps and free voice calls to any domestic network for 200 baht inclusive. Just takes a little effort...

2 hours ago, sometimewoodworker said:

Where is your test data. You complain that there is no data there then can’t understand the geographical differences and why they invalidate the presented data. 
Show your own screen shots 

No tests I have run using the 2 programs show significant differences as long as you test close in time and for the geographical close servers.

 

I have no idea how SS3 got his data. He hasn’t shown any interest in testing like for like so far. There is no data that has been given to support the anomalous data

 

I use SPEEDTEST because it has a history that’s easy to access and it’s as good and accurate as any other, if it shows poor data I will change until then it’s good enough.

It seems that you aren't going to get it. We have reached the limit of your understanding. 

You carry on using Speedtest.net and we'll use Test My. Have a pleasant evening.

3 minutes ago, sometimewoodworker said:

@scubascuba3 posted the Japanese server data.

 

The data from different servers on Test My is extremely similar to that of similar speedtest servers in the same region.

 

if you are unable to understand that of course a server in Japan will be different from one in Thailand I am unable to simplify it enough for you.

Test My Has no Thailand server. 
the data produced has not been supported.

How does that explain Speedtest.net 71 Mbps on a 10 Mbps connection?

The Japanese server is irrelevant, since in this case it has returned accurate figures.

But the Speedtest Thai(AIS) server is returning skewed results. It seems your brain is resistant to salient facts.

6 minutes ago, sometimewoodworker said:

I have no interest in any one program or test suite. However there is no significant difference as long as you are testing like with like.

 

The faulty results could be explained by non current software, data filters etc on the browser as opposed to a dedicated program.

 

if you want to run a test that has any meaning then you need to ensure that you are accurately testing like with like

More nonsense it seems. Again, how is it that scuba, using the same device, same browser etc, gets shown 71 Mbps on a capped 10 Mbps connection when using Speedtest.net where Test My shows what is actually available; 10 Mbps.

You don't know and cannot explain it. Test My proven to be accurate; Speedtest.net shown under some circumstances to give completely skewed results.

An intelligent person would use the one that gives accurate results EVERY time.

Old habits die hard. Perhaps just use the brand name to which they have got used to, without thinking.

7 minutes ago, sometimewoodworker said:

The evidence is exactly that that @scubascuba3 posted showing a test from a Japanese server demonstrating that it’s speed was ridiculously slower than one from a Thai one.

 

That demonstrates nothing but that there are 2 servers running different software that are separated by somewhere over 2,000 miles that give different reports.

clearly though there is a difference that he has seen. I am unable to repeat any similar results using the 2 programs. Of course there is a difference but nothing remotely close to his report.

 

FWIW just because you have paid for a speed doesn’t mean that you are getting it, my contracted speed was being exceeded by 4 times the rating, when I enquired I was able to drop my monthly bill by 10% and increase my maximum by 15 times. So the reported speed are perfect possible.

 

As to gaslighting that is BS none of my devices have been able to duplicate his results, they are all reasonably close. I can slow both results down by using a round trip using a VPN however they are still close.

 

The definition of faulty test data are data that cannot be replicated by an independent observer. 

 

Of course I tested both his preference, using both Japanese and a Singapore server and Speedtest using servers in the  same geographic regions. They were broadly similar for a given location.
 

It made no difference if I were using data or broadband, same speeds for the same test, of course the cellular network speeds were much slower, the Japan servers was about ½ to ⅓  the speed of Singapore 

 

I stopped reading after the first paragraph, as it is patently clear that you do not have a clue.

Try to keep it simple. Provide an explanation of why, on a capped 10 Mbps connection, Speedtest.net indicates a speed of 71 Mbps.

I already explained to you why the results are skewed and why Test My is more accurate.

Test My comes up with an accurate measurement as opposed to a clearly skewed result from Speedtest.net/AIS.

What is your explanation for that?

1 hour ago, KanchanaburiGuy said:

Don't try to blame me for your own bad behavior. How I responded is not the point. Your bad behavior is the point. In a world of Cause and Effect, it's Cause  that earns the blame, not Effect!

 

Ultimately, you didn't get an answer your question.......... because your decision to be snarky proved you didn't deserve  an answer. 

 

Pffft!

...or maybe you just don't have a good answer, so you try to deflect. School playground.

2 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

https://shopee.co.th/teichi77?categoryId=100639&itemId=21033565573

 

Is this the same stuff / seller  looks like you got a good price   it seems to be going up  

Products disappeared from her page as I was looking at it ????

2 hours ago, sometimewoodworker said:

Clearly it doesn’t. Why you would believe that a speed test from a server in Japan is relevant to the speed you can get using a connection from Thailand boggles my mind.

 

The only way that is related is if you are using services from Japan. 

From having tested a variety of programs using a number of geographical related servers, there is little difference between speed test results. If you use non related servers of course there can be very different results.

 

SPEEDTEST is no worse than any other it is significantly better in that you can select the most appropriate location to test. Though you are left with few choices using test.my Singapore is more useful than Japan. I see virtually no difference in speed reporting using either service. (Singapore servers for both) 
 

You are wrong. Speedtest is the biggest test out there, so certain ISPs have dedicated servers for it, which skew the result. How else can you explain 71 Mbps on a 10 Mbps line?

This doesn't happen with https://testmy.net yet you 'gaslight' scuba by suggesting that testmy doesn't get it right when the evidence shows that it does and that Speedtest does not.

Have you got even one example of testmy getting it wrong? If not, then how can you write "clearly it doesn't"?

Are you living in a different reality where the truth is a lie and a lie is the truth?

Where is your evidence? scuba posted his.

3 hours ago, sometimewoodworker said:

Your speed check is completely bogus unless you actually choose the same server to test.

 

Clearly you are not comparing like with like. You have 2 servers that are 2,500 miles apart and suggest that it proves anything. 

If you actually want to test the programs then use the same server as close to the same time as feasible & you need to give the data needed like ping, jitter and packet loss.

 

Having done exactly that there are moderate differences between programs nothing significant. Certainly nothing remotely close to your numbers.

You don't know what you are talking about. You are unable to explain the reason for Speedtest.net showing 71 Mbps on a 10 Mbps connection.

The answer has something to do with certain ISPs optimising test servers especially for Speedtest.net. 

If you want to know your real speed and not some enhanced reporting, use https://testmy.net .....or don't. But stop blathering on about things that you don't understand.