watthong

No, it's not at all bizarre, in fact uber normal when Mom "likes" her child - no, let's me correct myself, Mom LOVES her child despite said child being "someone with flaws." But it's indeed bizarre when someone regarded "a racist, misogynist, adulterer, convicted criminal, and habitual liar be a bonus" in his or her political/social world view. Unless, as the saying goes, "birds of a feather tend to flock together." (Please don't make me state the obvious.) Anyway what I'm saying is the mother-likes-child analogy in this context is facetious, if not moronic. Again, it's funny how fools think they can fool other people with their scattered brains, cranium-crammed garbage-in/garbage-out "logic." But as the world turns...

That;s what I did last week, and I posted their response here:

As of this morning - just when I am ready to shop for a new sim - it looks like 30mbps is "Out of stock" all across the board :=( (Only 15 mbps available, albeit at the SAME price!)

"Educated folks" don't claim they're "Educated folks..." Tooting one's own horn is never considered bien-eleve'. Oh pardon my French - but since we are on that subject: Nor do "Educated folks..." sprinkle cheap French cologne - Mon Ami," "Adieu" (in another post) - on their speech, though it might help masking the stench. [Btw, what happened to "little fella"? that one sounded "educated" enough - oh, I see. No, I never thought you were referring to Trump. I swear.] Anyway last but not least "Educated folks" don't show their tail, oh pardonnez-moi, their roots this way... ...because putting one foot in one's mouth is never apropos.

Which one?

Whenever these "little fellas" - like the one quoted above - throw out an accusation, it usually boomerangs back as a confession (or simply "Pot calling the kettle black!") Another endearing trait commonly found among "the slavering right wing law abusing mob that runs the Republican party these days...."

Pot calling the kettle black (always one of the most endearing traits of the MAGA crowd.) Thanks. now we can really see who is totally "whacked out" - and how. (No need to click on those links, unless you want to be totally "whacked out!" - their headline say it all.)

He's the type during my junior years we would call "Big Mouth" - usually some twerp who sports an alpha male complex. Totally in love of his own word salads (copiously sprinkled with pseudo-psycho babble) and frequent display of fake bravado of superiority ... Anyway, watch Trump post-convict presser and compare with the below post to see any correlation, by chance?

It's called "to the full EXTENT of the laws." An oxymoron as one half can only be true if the other half isn't.

Actually Trump sounds like a broken record - the single one. And looks like a tired clown the day the circus leaving town. Sick, old and worn out, but still has to work the podium somehow. Poor Donnie. Funny how Trump once called Better Midler a "washed-up has-been wanna-be..." He should give her a call and reclaim that title: "washed-up" convict "has-been" in the WH "wanna-be" in the WH again. Best of luck, Donnie.

Cut+paste from my earlier reply to another numbnut, for my own convenience. Here it goes: "How many time does it need to be pointed out that this trial is about falsyfying of records and not about the hush-up? Playing dumb is not going to win any argument for ya. Neither is deflection." (Oh, look over there, and there, and there - look Ma, no crimes!)

What proz saying is that they were not going into the hush money affair per se (whether the two actually ever met, fvcked, had a pillow or dildo fight) or the effect it might or might not produce. It's just not their target. Anyway how many time does it need to be pointed out that this trial is about falsyfying of records and not about the hush-up? Playing dumb is not going to win any argument for ya. Neither is deflection (about evidence or lack thereof re the tryst.)

Again the stale worn "no there is no evidence that blal bla bla would've made the difference" nonsense when one has nothing that make sense to offer, or to voice one's discontent by. Stormy Daniels mader Trump campaign run around like chickens with head cut off.

In my case, I glued 1 onto the form itself at the blank space for photo. The other 1 I put in a little see-through paper envelope, with my name and old pp number in the back. It was returned untouched, still in the see through thing, included in the new pp package. [I stand corrected at the mention of "cashier check" in my previous post. It was "bank draft" and I forgot the term for it so I said "cashier check."]

True, appointment for passport renewal is not an option on the website, but there was no definite no-no as in "you can't just show up and barge in to renew your passport!" (The instructions wording is rather obtuse when it comes to this, at purpose I must say.) The guy just showed up at the gate with all the forms in hand and prolitely told the guard that he would like to renew his passport. He was let in. I did mull over this option myself, but like most, was too chicken to do it and had to gone through all the miseries of doing it by mail.

It's a moot point because as instructed, "Prepaid envelope cannot be accepted if you are applying for a U.S. passport in Thailand." When I did this last year, I got a separate cashier check for the embassy to use as fund to send my new pp to me when the embassy got it from US passport services. A side note to American expats in Bangkok: best to just do it in person at the embassy, even though they try to "talk" you out of it in so many ways - but no where did they say "No way!" Someone on in this forum insisted this in-person approach as he distrusted all mail services. He showed up at the embassy, submitted the forms, photos, money matters to a real person, and told her to email him when the embassy got his new pp so he could come back and collect it. That's how he got his new pp. Best part of this, beside all documents passing from his hands directly to the embassy staff, and vice versa on the way back, is if anything not acceptable (forms, photos, money matters) he will know it right then and there. Had I done it this way, I would still have a full head of hair.

I just did that, they replied with "Now the product [30mbps] is out of stock. Unlimited internet customers have a maximum speed of 15mbps. Are you interested in using it first?" On the other hand, looks like Melon Thai is having it again, though the price is 1k more than last year.. In short the stock availability seems to change month to month.

Could you provide the link to mobile2you website? I tried Mobile2You.com and co.th and got nowhere... Thanks.

Y-A-W-N-N-N-N.... For the convenience of all concerned -and non concerned- parties, let me cut+paste my reply (from one such thread) to the homophobic brigade, here there and elsewhere: "....What makes it "difficult to participate in this discussion" is the amount of garbage thrown in by the anti-gay pundits left and right in order to to distort and/or obfuscate the topic - as you can see on full display on this thread, and as inevitably on any other gay-related issues. You can try to pin them down, and when getting caught, these cowards simply deny what they previously said to wiggle their way out. Often a kick in the right place would see them scoot, tail between their legs. The well meaning folks both straight and gay from the general public/forum simply stay away from such contentious thread as one would from a soi with too many feral looking dogs. I used to disregard the haters but that simply inflamed them further and the thread went down quickly. But at least by confronting them one by one, people who care would have the opportunity to see the hatred and the insanity from these bigots who though vocal and bordering on rabid, are just a small minority and probably would go to their grave still full of bile." NEXT! There you have it folks, just a taste...For the whole enchilada, click on the link below: https://aseannow.com/topic/1324413-fears-of-discrimination-in-thailand-despite-looming-same-sex-marriage-bill/page/4/

Thanks for the update. Much appreciated. Even if the transition happens in one day, "logic" would dictate that: a ) Closing one account and opening a new account (ie moving 800K between old and new one) on the SAME DAY "should" satisfy the requirement that you have 800K in one bank account of that particular day. (I say "should" because IO could nick pick that at one period of that day, between the closing of one and the opening of the other, you did not have 800K in a bank account. I remember some past situation when - in one same account as opposed to closing one and opening another - one person made a withdrawal that let the balance drop below 800K, but later filled it up. He did that in the same day. However the IO faulted him on that, saying that in one instance - even though within the same day - his account dipped below the 800K line and therefore not qualified for extension!) b ) If you have that transition stretched out say 2 weeks, meaning having 2 accounts both holding 800K each for 2 weeks, then for that period you have twice the amount of 800k in bank accounts. In both scenarios, you have satisfied the requirement of having at least 800k in bank account(s) during the "transition" period. The rest would be the formalities of proof, ie the supporting documents, and that would be at the whims of the IO, though on our part we can make sure to have bank statements and bank books (both old and new accounts) at the ready just in case. As it turned out, you only needed "statement and bank letter only from the new bank." Good job!

of 77 yo? the only "frequency a 20 yo would be demanding from" from partner of such age would be if he were Hugh Hefner.

I assume by "people"you mean us the applicants. I can recall from experience why the two would get lumped together, and it wasn't by the IO. One time I was doing both extension and 90 day report at the same time because both time frames kinda "collided." In that instance, the people at the queue machine told me to do the extension first, so that when I was ready to do the report afterward, I could use the new extension (expiration) date. That's how I see the 90 day date got "reset."

I'm glad you didn't take that personally...

I did my 90 day report on line sometime in April (and on schedule after I got an email reminder.) The report was successful and it came back with a receipt and next report due date (sometime in July). A week later, the last week of April, I went to Immigration to do my annual extension. The IO did not say anything about my 90 day report, nor whether the report due date has been reset. So I guess I would expect some sort of hiccups when I do my next on-line reporting?

Well, now you have: Those are your words. Like I said before, your bias is showing. Then adding fake sympathy to injury, or shall I say, hypocrisy: "I feel bad for the LGBs,...their cause is kind of being high-jacked." There is a word for pushing one (sub-) group against another, it's called "snitch." They (the trans) are not hi-jacking the gay cause. It's the likes of you that are doing it. And the same manner you are hell-bent on pushing your propaganda that somehow gays want their same sex marriage to be regarded as "man-woman" marriage. Insidious.