herfiehandbag
-
Posts
6,688 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by herfiehandbag
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
10 minutes ago, Logosone said:You are obviously unaware that the huge death camps with factories were all located outside Germany.
There wasn't a single one in Germany, all were in Poland. And of course the reason for that is obvious. Himmler complained time and time again of the sympathy ordinary Germans had for jews, that they did not understand the need for them to be exterminated, hence the death camps were all located outside Germany and the operations were kept secret.
Mittelburg -Dora was at Nordhausen in Thuringia. Sachsenhausen was at Orianenburg, various of the Krupp works in the Ruhr were large scale users of concentration camp labour. Peenemunde on the Baltic coast of Mecklenburg; all major sites using forced labour by concentration camp inmates, all in Germany.
- 2
- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
55 minutes ago, Logosone said:This whole idea that 80 million people would know of a highly secretive operation of the state is akin to stating the entire population of the UK today knows of the top-secret operations of the UK.
It's frankly ludicrous.
That in itself is a ludicrous comparison.
Let us consider one of the perhaps largest
topsecret operations in the UK - the arrangements for storing and moving the UK's nuclear weapons. A small number of people are involved in this, it is carried out discretely, and in plain view. Many/most simply do not realise what the road vehicles or train which has just passed was carrying. It certainly does not have a banner attached reading "Nukes - please do not look!" This is top secret- the idea is that nobody notices, and only a very small number of people are party to it.
Now compare that with rounding up whole communities, and either marching them to an adjacent wood and shooting them, or putting them in crammed freight trains, which trundle for hundreds of kilometres through the public railway system to be unloaded a vast camps, from which they never emerge. Compare that with huge factories in which slave labour was literally worked to death, in full view of other workers. In the last month's, do you think that the general population did not notice the long columns of emaciated prisoners being brutally forcemarched westwards, again in full view, from the evacuated camps in the east?
To state, in the face of all the evidence that people did not know, is ludicrous. The claims of general ignorance advanced at the war's end were ignored, that does not mean they were accepted, and as far more information has emerged in recent years they have clearly been shown to have little foundation.
Frankly, only a miniscule proportion of the armed forces were convicted because with millions of surrendered personnel to be guarded, processed and released, there was neither the time, resources or will to conduct investigations to put them on trial.
In hindsight, that was perhaps a great failing, it led to frankly spurious "statistics" which can be used in peddling the revisionist theories which you have obviously bought into.
.
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Logosone said:It's bad enough that you try and portray the events at Celle as somehow indicating the barbarity of the people of Celle, who hosted you, when in fact it was the barbarity of the Allied bombing of civilians that led to over 2000 of the 4000 plus strong transport of prisoners to be killed by Allied bombs. Then you proceed to claim Germans who apprehended escaped inmates and killed 30 for looting were the real bad guys, ignoring that the Allied planes killed 2000 of those very same prisoners. It's pathetic.
Just like your attempt to equate David Irving's claims with mine, which are entirely different. However, talking about that trial, in it Evans makes clear that
"the genocide was often described using euphemisms such as "special tasks" and "executive measures"; Einsatzgruppe victims were often described as having been shot while trying to escape"
Obviously because those responsible for the genocide knew it was against international law and attempted to keep it highly secret. Holocaust scholarship, even Evans, can't have it both ways, they can't claim on the one hand "Oh they took all these measures to keep it secret, used secret terminology "special treatment" meant killings, but on the other hand "Oh all Germans knew". It's a pathetic claim and obviously wrong.
1. The people of Celle did not "host me". I was stationed there, as part of an international alliance (NATO) intended to deter the very real threat of invasion of Western Europe by the Soviet Union, at, I might add, a very significant cost to the United Kingdom.
2. I went out of my way to mix with the local population, far more so than most of my peers. At the time I accepted their claimed ignorance of what had happened. I accepted that. Subsequent reading, both about Celle and the rest of Germany has led me to believe that knowledge of the genocidal policies enacted by the state, and involving a significant number of it's people, was much more widespread than they claimed.
3. I also said that I don't believe that the German People should pay an eternal price. But I do believe that members of that generation, who were active in the genocide system, should, whilst they survive, be brought to justice.
4. You are beginning to reveal what I suspect are your true colours - as one bent on revisionist interpretations of that evil creed and it's actions. An approach that has been utterly rebuffed by academic research and debate, the courts both in Germany and throughout the western world, and by the simple, factual accounts of history. As a German of a current generation you emphatically do not have to hang your head in shame at what happened; as a person who seeks to revise, shift blame to others, and justify by faux comparisons with the horrors of all out war what was done to the Jews and others by the NAZI state, and to further the ludicrous claim that the people, including those working in the system did not know what was happening, you should (be ashamed).
- 4
-
8 hours ago, Morch said:
It wasn't claimed that Dey knew "the full extent". That you find Dey's version of things as definitive, true and correct is at odds with the court's view. All of the words you pour here in the service of historical revisionism would not change that. Same goes for cherry-picking bits from links, making bogus claims based on figures and statistics, cherry-picked as well. And let's not forget the trademark ignoring of any comment, fact or rebuttal that does not seat with the narrative pushed.
He quotes Richard Evans to support his claims that the Holocaust was not known about by the German People.
When David Irving advanced similar claims ( to those of Logosone) he was the subject of a hostile review by a book reviewer - American academic Deborah Lipstadt. Irving sued Lipstadt and her publishers Penguin Books for libel. Evans was a principal witness for the defence. Your post is actually an accurate summary of Evans's dismissal of Irvings claims !
Irving lost and had to pay costs.
- 1
-
He is of course the very model of discretion.
There is a widely available video clip, of him indulging in what might be described as "kinetic discretion" against some demonstrators with whose viewpoint he took exception. Using boots, fists and brandishing a weapon - he actually had to be hauled away by cooler heads amongst his staff.
Wasn't crying though; maybe he has mellowed...
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, Logosone said:There is a thing called "chain of causation". It means that you first have to establish factual causation, in other words "but for the conduct of the defendant" would the harm have occurred? There were many camp guards in WWII. Many camps, in most there were no gassings. It certainly can not be said that being a camp guard inevitably resulted in gassing or killing of prisoners. But for the conduct of Dey would these killings have happened or not? In other words was Dey's conduct a direct factual causation in killing or gassing prisoners? Very obviously it was not. Plenty of guards watched over inmates but their conduct did not result in killings or gassings.
For example if A kills victim B then A is factually responsible for the killing. The birth of A's grandmother is a causally relevant condition but not a cause. On the other hand, A's gunshot, being a deliberate human intervention in the ordinary state of affairs, is elevated to the status of "cause".
This was just not the case with Dey's actions. Dey did NOT play a part in the holocaust, which refers to the killing of jews. Dey did not participate in the actual killing. Nor was Dey an accomplice. He had no direct, planning or causal connection with anyone who did any killing, and never worked actively to cause any killing.
He did not kill any Jews. He was not part, knowingly, of a scheme to kill Jews. He was unaware of such a scheme. When Dey was conscripted the holocaust was no known the way it is today. In 1943 a poll of Americans revealed that half of all Americans thought the holocaust was just a rumour. Dey did not know that he was doing anything other than being a tower guard.
To say he played a part in comitting 5000 murders is simply ludicrous.
As for knowing or not knowing, no-one is pretending that nobody knew, obviously some did, however the very vast majority of Germans simply did not know. They did not participate in the killings, only 0.11 percent of the Wehrmacht were found guilty of that, they had no jewish neighbours (only 400,000 - 500,000 in Germany at the time, 80 million Germans).
You illustrate this yourself in your Celle story when you say "but it was, I am now sure, a secret kept by her father, and her uncles (whom I met) and the old boys with whom I spent such happy times running model trains!", of course those who were involved had every motivation in the world to keep it secret. Some didn't, but that was a very small minority.
Most Germans did not know.
3 hours ago, Logosone said:As for knowing or not knowing, no-one is pretending that nobody knew, obviously some did, however the very vast majority of Germans simply did not know. They did not participate in the killings, only 0.11 percent of the Wehrmacht were found guilty of that, they had no jewish neighbours (only 400,000 - 500,000 in Germany at the time, 80 million Germans).
You illustrate this yourself in your Celle story when you say "but it was, I am now sure, a secret kept by her father, and her uncles (whom I met) and the old boys with whom I spent such happy times running model trains!", of course those who were involved had every motivation in the world to keep it secret. Some didn't, but that was a very small minority.
Most Germans did not know.
Everyone in Celle in 1945 was aware of "The Great Celle Rabbit Hunt". That is a lot of people. Then consider the numbers of other people who lived adjacent to all the other camps, the people who worked in the industries which used the slave labour which they provided, all those who worked on the railways which played such a major part in moving the victims, all those who simply saw the trains pass through stations whilst they waited on the platforms, and so on and so on. It is quite simply incredible that what was going on was unknown. Oh they may have not known the details, how many died in which week, and from what causes, but absolutely it must have been common knowledge that something awful, and broadly understood, was going on in these camps, both within Germany itself and throughout the Reich.
Only a very small proportion of the Wehrmacht or SS were convicted, true. Only a very small proportion of the German Armed Forces were prosecuted, true. There were many prisoners held by May 1945, millions. The pressure ion the Western Allies was to demobilise them, get them home, to start to rebuild Germany. The East had perhaps slightly different priorities, to use them to rebuild the damage from the war in the Soviet Union and what had become it's satellite states. There were very limited resources to screen and investigate. I had the privilege of speaking to men (at a veterans reunion which I was involved in hosting) who went into Belsen in the hours after the liberation of the camp. They were of the opinion, forcefully expressed, that every single German in uniform, should have been held in the camps and the parts which they played rigorously investigated. I'm sure that opinion was shared by those who went into Birkenau, Dachau, Auschwitz and every other place where the 3rd Reich, and the men who served it, (as did Dey, however humble their role) had uncovered the entrances to hell. That was of course not possible, so the vast majority of perpetrators went unpunished.
As for the poll of Americans in 1943, that was 2 years before the camps were liberated. Quite probably many of those polled only had the haziest of ideas as to why the US was at war with Germany. Maybe they should have been asked again in 1946, when the facts were known, and the men who had discovered them had returned home.
Anyway, like @stevenl I'm leaving the subject - it is clear that you will not accept the involvement of that generation of Germans in what happened, nor the inevitable and inescapable fact that they must have known. Further discussion will only lead, I suspect, to denial, at least of the scale of the Holocaust, if not of it's very existence.
I'm out.
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
6 hours ago, Logosone said:Knowledge of the holocaust was certainly not universal in the German military.
If you read Richard Evans, he makes clear that German documentation went to great lengths to disguise mass killings. Why use the term "Special treatment" if not to hide what was actually meant.
Dey may have heard rumours of gas chambers, but it was war time. A lot of the talk about the holocaust would have been dismissed as propaganda.
Only 0.11% of the German military were convicted of war crimes. Those involved were an incredibly small minority.
Dey was not guilty of anything. He was a tower guard. He killed nobody. Yet he is convicted of 5000 plus murders? And nobody bats an eyelid?
In the late 1970s early 1980s I spent three years (as part of a much longer career), as a British Soldier, based in a place called Celle, a small town between Hannover and Luneburg in Lower Saxony. Perhaps slightly unusually amongst my peers, (even then I was regarded as a dangerous radical) I made some efforts to interact with the local community. I spoke some German from school, and worked hard to improve it. I spent several months - the best part of a year - enthusiastically chasing the affections of a (gorgeous) local girl, the daughter of a "senior and well regarded" member of the community - her family name prefixed by "Von". I joined the local Model Railway Club, based in an old signal box at the main railway station.
Amongst all the Germans (of the generation who had lived/served during the war) the recurrent mantra was "of course we knew nothing of all that". Information was much less freely available back then (no internet) and so I accepted that at face value.
Celle is an important railway junction. The railway station and yards lie within the area of the town. One of the branch lines runs to Bergen Hohne, a few kilometres away, and then known as Bergen Belsen. The trains carrying their tragic cargoes to that camp would have been marshalled in those yards, and run through the station and out through the suburbs of the town. In early 1945, during an air raid on the railway yards, a large number of Jews, bound for Belsen, escaped from a train and hid in the heathlands and pine forests to the North and West of Celle. What followed was known as "The Great Celle Rabbit Hunt". The adult and teenage population of the town enthusiastically hunted down the escaped inmates. Some were beaten to death, most were returned to the camps, marched through the streets. Their pitiful state could hardly have gone unnoticed. At the time I knew nothing of this - it was never mentioned. The Internet has allowed it to be known now.
Now I don't think that the entire community must carry endless guilt for this - I am sure that the lovely Julianna (ah such memories!) would be horrified to know of it - but it was, I am now sure, a secret kept by her father, and her uncles (whom I met) and the old boys with whom I spent such happy times running model trains! It was most certainly not an "unknown". That, and the knowledge of what happened throughout the sorry mess which was the Third Reich must be admitted. Only then, and even now, can that guilt be expunged. Pretending that no-one knew, or that there were comparable atrocities, or that it is exaggerated (yes I have read David Irving's spittle flecked apologist books on the subject) simply prolongs the "national guilt"
This fellow played a part in the holocaust, he was a camp guard. It is right that his guilt, as part of that terrible action, should be confirmed, I also think that it is right that mercy was demonstrated in sentencing him, as a man in his 90s. Mercy which was not displayed to those he guarded.
- 5
- 1
-
44 minutes ago, Bangkok Barry said:
As for the tourists who have been spending their enforced time in the country by putting money into the economy every day, they have been given a pretty stark warning that they are no longer wanted in the country. Okay, many might have been able to leave before, but still. I wonder how many countries like to discourage tourists. They like the country, believe all the faff from TAT, come and spend and then are told that, actually, you've spent enough time and have to get out. We don't want you here anymore.
I honestly don't think that there is any official policy to discourage foreigners from visiting, or living here. There is some occasional "loose mouthed xenophobic talk" but it does not represent any sort of policy. In fact I don't think there is a policy on the matter really.
Rather, it is the familiar problem ( with Thai governance) of the left hand not knowing (or bothering) what the right hand is doing. The problem is compounded because like the Hindu Goddess ( Kali is it?) there are half a dozen or more arms waving around!
- 1
-
On 7/24/2020 at 12:20 PM, stouricks said:
Totally agree. I am on my second NUC, i5, 256 SSD, 8 GB RAM, W10 2004, PRO, Express VPN, through a 55 inch Samsung Series 5 NON Smart telly,, absolutely perfect
I am terrifically impressed, I really am.
I just wish I had the slightest glimmer of an idea about what it all means!
????
- 1
-
19 hours ago, Logosone said:
You wrote above, anyone can see, "Your reasoning behind the stats is way off, you can't just relate the 20k convicted to the total number of wehrmacht soldiers for quite a few reasons."
So what reasons would these be?
Presumably you believe more than 0.11% of the Wehrmacht were involved in war crimes. Why is this?
Some years ago I read an absolutely spine chilling book titled "The Good Old Days". It was an account of the Holocaust in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, compiled from interviews with and accounts of the activities of some of the perpetrators. What was absolutely clear was that participation in and knowledge of the killings and the whole process was widespread, if not universal, thought the German Military. They knew what had been done, they new what retribution was coming. Why do you think that such large elements of the German armed forces fought so desperately up to the end.
If this fellow was a guard, irrespective of his age, volunteer or conscript, he knew what was going on in the camp. The machine gun in his tower wasn't just for him to lean on!
Guilt is guilt, irrespective of his age. The court showed mercy in its verdict, mercy which was denied to the thousands who died in the camp he guarded.
- 1
-
6 hours ago, steven100 said:
were they in Hawaii for new Hawaii Five 0 episodes with Jack Lord I think it was ?
Jack Lord looked like a plastic surgeon's CV portfolio when they made the original series. Heaven only knows what he must look like now!
Great opening theme tune though!
- 1
- 1
-
53 minutes ago, ChrisY1 said:
I'm dreaming of a white christmas in Pattaya....tourists ain't coming..their countries won't let them!
For goodness sake, don't whatever you do play that on the jukebox!
Half the "vets" will drain their beers and hop on the next bus to the airport, carrying only what they can get into their pockets!????????
-
1 hour ago, Surelynot said:
You can make it up......but you do need a very good imagination.
Or a job with TAT!
- 1
-
25 minutes ago, chilly07 said:
If they educated and trained recruits in trades and skills necessary for a modern army they would have so many volunteers that they wouldn't need to draft
That rather presupposes that they are a modern army!
-
I suppose we should look for the up side of things - were the present government to step down, whoever succeeds will have a brand new 1.3 billion Baht VIP aircraft which could be used to collect her and bring her back. Always supposing that it hasn't been sent on a hastily organised one way flight out of the country of course...
- 2
-
Actually, perhaps it is good news.
He will be free to join the rest of his peer group at the demonstrations against the government!
- 1
-
5 hours ago, Logosone said:
Lol, your empty air rather misses the point namely that 40 U.S. Code 1315 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 gives the department’s secretary the power to deputize other federal agents to assist the Federal Protective Service in protecting federal property, such as the courthouse in Portland.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/17/us/politics/federal-agents-portland-arrests.html
Again, you need to understand a bit more of the law, than you do, Chomper Higgott.
Does "protecting Federal Property" include using unidentifiable paramilitaries to snatch people off the streets, and throwing them into unmarked vehicles, and then "detaining them"? Does "protecting Federal Property" involve widespread use of "sub lethal munitions", random use of CS gas, pepper spray at point blank range and beating people with batons?
I'll stick my head out, and suggest it doesn't, no matter what the enthusiasts for brutal treatment of protesters and demonstrators demand.
I will also state, quite categorically and based on considerable experience, that the easiest way to escalate an angry crowd into a rioting crowd, and to completely lose control, is to set loose a body of trigger happy, ill trained and gung ho paramilitaries in an attempt to disperse that crowd.
This federal intervention has made a difficult situation infinitely worse. You reap what you sow, and the Trump administration is sowing the seeds of a long term mistrust, antipathy too and disregard for federal authority.
- 2
- 1
-
4 hours ago, Tippaporn said:
So misleading to post this pick with your comment. But you know that.
The Land of the Free does not mean that you are free to commit violence, loot, engage in arson, deface public property or the like. The pictured officers are combating that illegal behaviour.
Again, so misleading.
Does "The Land of the Free" allow a President to deploy an alphabet soup of hastily trained Federal agents, from a variety of organisations, against the clear wishes of state and municipal authorities; principally, it rather seems, because those authorities are governed by his political critics and because the voters of those cities did not support him electorally.
Portland does seem to be several hundred kilometres from a border, so why are the Border Patrol involved? Perhaps because they are controlled by his administration, and are in the process of being formed into a Federal Paramilitary force, conveniently outside the scope of existing accountability and constitutional constraints!
I wonder what part they will be playing by late November this year?
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
240 million for promoting government policy, or 1.35 billion for (another) VIP airplane...
- 10
- 1
- 2
-
1 hour ago, Paiman said:
The decree permitted the restriction of the right to assembly, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press, among other rights, and it removed all restraints on police investigations. With the decree in place, the regime was free to arrest and incarcerate political opponents without specific charge, dissolve political organizations, and suppress publications.
Above was for the protection of people and State 28 Feb. 1933. Any similarities?
Yes, some very distinct similarities.
To be fair I don't think they are using it as a template - but that's only because they probably have no knowledge of that particular part of history. History, for them does not exist north of Mai Sai or south of Hat Yai.
They would certainly recognise the results as most desirable.
- 1
-
4 hours ago, rkidlad said:
Thailand doesn't have rule of law. They have rule by law.
An excellent description. Very precise and accurate.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, Tippaporn said:If the mayors and governors are fine with riots and unlawful acts then normal people, including Trump, aren't.
Goodness gracious me, are you suggesting that Mr Trump is a "normal person"?
- 2
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
18 minutes ago, robblok said:Yes i loved part of what the junta did when i thought they would have been gone quickly. Now i see that they are as corrupt as the Taksin goverments (if not worse).
Problem is even if there is blood on the street without a party that is good like future forward to vote upon nothing will change. A corrupt Taksin party or a corrupt junta party. I mean without a 3rd good choice nothing will change.
I doubt whether very many of the participants in this movement will have been old enough to vote for Thaksin, or his sister.
I suspect that those of them that have voted almost certainly voted for Future Forward.
If the Junta falls ( and it won't step aside in the interests of fairness, that is as naive an expectation as imagining that the Junta only took power for very limited objectives over a short time!) then there is nothing to prevent Future Forward from reforming.
These protests are Future Forward, or the movement which grew out of it. Whilst Thaksin might regard them with a benevolent eye, he is not driving them.
- 8
-
- Popular Post
That a Government Agency, tasked with organising policy to counter the Covid Pandemic is run by a General, and is proposing to the Cabinet ( also run by Generals) an extension to the State of Emergency ( which essentially suspends what little accountability government had) tells you everything you need to know about governance here.
- 3
German court convicts 93-year old man for Nazi crimes
in World News
Posted · Edited by herfiehandbag
You yourself said;
I named 3 camps at which inmates were worked to death in factories and a further major industrial enterprise all within Germany.
If we are talking ignorant codswallop, then you take the prize Mr Logosone, however "codswallop" is generally accepted as innocent rubbish, you however are deliberately spinning a web of disinformation, half truths and selective quotes in an attempt do defend the indefensible - the loathsome activities which we are discussing, and which you seek to diminish and excuse. The ghost of Dr Goebbels must be proud of you!