Jump to content

herfiehandbag

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    6,517
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by herfiehandbag

  1. 2 hours ago, sambum said:

    I presume because people in "pubs and bars" are less likely to follow the "social distancing" rule!

    Perhaps because going to pubs and bars, for Thais, is very much an activity indulged in by young middle class people - dangerous people. they have ideas and opinions, which they may exchange and share - dangerous people...

    • Confused 1
  2. 36 minutes ago, Brunolem said:

    The closed door will stop them... 

    Yesterday evening my daughter went to the movies with her pals. I dropped her off, and had a couple of hours to wait. I haven't been in town in the evening since the whole lockdown palaver began. To my surprise, about 60% or so of the street food stalls and shophouse restaurants were open, and quite busy. Some bars were open, albeit with dimmed lighting, once off the main roads even more so. I took a stroll down the " western strip" (such as it is). No tourists of course, and only one of the westerner owned bars showed any signs of life; several of the Thai owned operations were discretely open. The massage joints all had the usual collection of girls outside. Absolutely (as before) no sign of any police presence. 

     

    I was surprised. Now we are a long way from Bangkok, but I can't help wondering if 1) the authorities have proved susceptible to a certain amount of "influence" and 2) are the Thais voting with their feet?

  3. 1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

    And as is the case with everything this administration does, no thought is given to the bigger picture, the long term view, or the value of the money that these gals earn, when it is sent and spent upcountry. Again, upcountry does not count for much, though they represent the majority. The poor here are scorned and ignored. Why do you think Thaksin was so immensely popular? 

     

    This is all about power, at this point, and has NOTHING to do with public safety. And the best way to insure public safety and well being is to let them go back to work.

    Whatever the initial aim (to inhibit the spread of Covid 19) it has become a means of re-ordering society, how the people live, interact, earn a living, are educated, and when permitted enjoy themselves. It all hinges on control, the mobile phone apps are central to that. The Orwellian catch phrases "new normal" and "the new normal era" are the give aways!

     

    For those lower down the chain of command, it is an almost unlimited, endless opportunity to enjoy and exercise power, to be welcomed eagerly.

     

    Will they be able to establish the level of control needed to ensure that it works? We will see. Given their track record for incompetence and corruption, and given that those at the top have little interest in anything or anybody beyond metropolitan Bangkok ( unless it is a gold mine or similar source of wealth!) I am sceptical.

    • Like 1
  4. 16 hours ago, smedly said:

    if I owned a bar I'd be very angry

    Perhaps not enough bar and venue owners have sold to the right people at the right price - yet?

     

    I'm not suggesting that the principal of applying measures to inhibit the spread of the Covid 19 virus is (was) wrong.

     

    I do suspect that latterly a variety of ulterior motives have emerged, in the way that they are being applied.

    • Like 2
  5. Personally, I am always amused by the slogan " finger licking good" emblazoned across the "embonpoint" of the young ladies who work behind the counter of my local KFC!

  6. It is becoming rather obvious that, along with the remarkable level of control that they have established over the lives, economic activity and movements of their own population, they are seeking to extend the same degree of detailed control over any tourists.

     

    I believe that they call it the "new normal"?

  7. 11 hours ago, rooster59 said:

    new normal era."

    It does sound remarkably permanent doesn't it? A new order?

     

    If (perish the thought) the government had the slightest leaning towards being an authoritarian regime these practices, controlling peoples movement, social activities, and determining exactly how they are to live, and how (or even if) people are to be allowed to conduct their businesses would be a veritable wet dream to the sort of people who favour black polo shirts tucked into black "business trousers".  Lucky that it is just a set of simple precautions to hamper the spread of the virus isn't it?

  8. Looks like some sensible outdoor activity - a bit of physical activity and some interesting tasks for the children with a well presented message.

     

    Not sure about it being "military training" - no obvious cock ups, no transport turning up at the wrong place or time, nobody turning up in the wrong kit, no standing around for twenty minutes before being bollocked for being late, no cooks or Q staff throwing a wobbly because "they didn't know", where is the PTI at the end shouting about you being in your own time now? Nothing recognisably military about it at all!

    ????

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...