placeholder

Fox News did not disclose its all-women town hall with Trump was packed with his supporters Fox News hosted an all-women town hall with former President Donald Trump, billed as an opportunity for female voters to ask the Republican candidate questions that matter to them. The Georgia town hall, where Trump took questions on reproductive laws, transgender rights and other issues, aired Wednesday morning. But Fox News did not disclose that the female audience it selected for the event was packed with local Republican supporters and the network edited its broadcast to remove some of their vocal advocacy of Trump. https://krdo.com/news/2024/10/16/fox-news-did-not-disclose-its-all-women-town-hall-with-trump-was-packed-with-his-supporters/

Well, whoever said that is clearly clueless about the First Amendment. No wonder he's a Trump supporter.

The point you're not getting is that the money to Ukraine was already authorized through the legislative process. It was Mike Johnson, the Republican Speaker of the House who refused to reconvene Congress to pass legislation in the face of this emergency. Nice going, Republicans!

We identify a dozen examples of Trump demanding probes, but they all fell short because of lack of evidence. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/10/16/vance-falsely-claims-trump-didnt-go-after-his-enemies/

Trump is so mentally incompetent that he insists that tariffs won't be paid for by consumers but by... well it's not sure if he means the importers or the countries of their origin. But either way, this is the kind of thing that an elementary school child could see is nonsense.

Will B Good nailed you fair and square. Stop wriggling.

Trump backs out of CNBC interview, his second about-face with mainstream press this month https://www.aol.com/trump-backs-cnbc-interview-second-162918843.html

I challenged your assertions with statements of fact. Instead of specifically challenging those statements of fact, you just resorted to insults. I pointed out that according to the Constitution, presidents nominate supreme Court Justices. So if two vacancies occur president Harris would most likely nominate justices who would over turn the Dobbs decision. If Trump wins, most likely he would nominate justices who support the Dobbs decision. You have offers no refutation of this point at all. I also pointed out that Congress could enact act a law that aligns with Roe nationwide. It's likely that President Harris would sign that bill into law. And it's likely that President Trump would veto it. Once again, you will for no reputation of that point. So, despite your claim that it doesn't matter who is president as far as abortion irights are concerned, you are, in fact, dead wrong.

Here's how Fox News characterized it; Trump calls out Bloomberg News editor-in-chief for being 'wrong' on everything https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363297637112

Bloomberg Editor-In-Chief John Micklethwait did not take it easy on Trump, and it quickly became clear that the former president has no conception of the mechanics of or the potential ramifications of the economic platform he’s running on. Bluntly, the former president was incoherent when pressed with real questions about his policies. Micklethwait spent most of the interview attempting to break Trump out of what the former president repeatedly referred to as “the weave,” his term for his rambling digressions — with ever-decreasing intelligibility — and general inability to focus on a given topic for more than a few seconds during his rallies and interviews. https://archive.ph/gNmng#selection-1651.242-1655.330

Sure. Definitely. Those medical emergencies made continuing as per normal just impossible because Trump, being such an empathetical person, was so overcome with emotion that he just couldn't continue. Nothing at all bizarre about a Presidential candidate swaying to the music onstage for over half an hour. Nothing to see here.

Video of Donald Trump bopping on stage to the beat of his musical playlist - from Luciano Pavarotti to the Village People, for nearly 40 minutes after a truncated town hall in a battleground state - triggered more questions Tuesday about the former president's mental stability. "Hope he's okay," said Trump's Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, in a post on the social media platform X. Trump cut short Monday night's Pennsylvania town hall and called for the musical interlude after a pair of medical emergencies interrupted his campaign event. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/10/15/kamala-harris-mocks-donald-trumps-town-hall-behavior/75682746007/ Well, if he loses the election, maybe he can get a job as a backup dancer for Taylor Swift.

You've got nothing.

In other words, you've got nothing.

Actually,in some states you can't register by party. "Altogether, there are 31 states (plus the District of Columbia) with party registration; in the others, such as Virginia, voters register without reference to party." https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/registering-by-party-where-the-democrats-and-republicans-are-ahead/

That would be almost almost entirely before it was even possible for the general public to buy the stock. And of course, anyone who judges a company's success by its stock performance alone, clearly hasn't a clear about capitalism. Not only is Truth Social actually declining in user participation, but its revenue is virtually nil. Maybe this is why the company doesn't publish the kind of standard metrics that internet businesses that have nothing to hide do. And as has been pointed out often in the media, a single outlet of some Chick Fil-A stores take in more revenue than does Truth Social.

It's optional.

It's almost a sure thing that Harris will be saying things designed to infuriate Trump. But of course he won't respond with the usual rage and spite. Because despite his great age, Trump has demonstrated that he's still capable of learning.

Deflecting much?

But Trump says Baier is soft on the left.

So much falsehood packed into so little space. Let's start with your original claim: "But the truth is that the intelligent females on both sides know the POTUS cannot change the SCOTUS decision, and that it can only be overturned if it is challenged under the Constitution, and that all the SCOTUS did was to return the issue to the States where it belongs because it is a Health issue, not a 'rights' issue. But the stupid ones? They are voting Harris anyway." Actually Potus, acting in concert with Congress can sign into law legislation that aligns with the provisions of Roe. In effect, that would overturn the consequnences of the Supreme court ruling. Potus can also veto such legislation. So who wins the Presidency is obviously relevant. And of course, the fact is that under the Biden administration mifeprestone has been approved by the FDA to be prescribed and sent by mail without a woman actually seeing a physician. A Trump appointee could change that. Intelligent women and men know that. And if the next President gets the opportunity to appoint 2 news justices and that person is Kamala Harris, does it seem unlikely to you that they wouldn't vote to reinstate Roe. And if Trump gets to be President, isn't it likely that the opposite would be the case. And yet, you claim that it's unimportant which candidate wins the Presidency. And your comment that "A lot of people voted for Hillary as a means of supporting her to win, because they thought it was a 'good bet' - they have also learned their lesson too." is simply bizarre. What kind of evidence do you have to support such a weird claim?

Another point you missed about the supreme Court is that if Trump is reelected and vacancy comes open, most likely he will appoint another Justice who shares view similar to the three that he's already appointed. So that would put a reversal of Dobbs even further out of reach. Anyway, as your previous comment demonstrated, you don't really understand how the legislative, executive and judicial branches of the US government work.

Thanks for the harangue about abortion But of course there is no constitutional prohibition on Congress passing a law that follows the guidelines of Roe v. Wade. As for The bookies.. where was the smart money in 2016? And thanks for hearing about all the other irrelevant stuff too.

Possible of course. But given that after the Dobbs decision, the polls underreported Democratic vote by an average of 3.8%, there may be something that the polls aren't capturing.

Not a great punchline. But you'll get there.