placeholder

Are you claiming that climatologisst have been predicting each and every year that the collapse will happen in each and every one of those years? If not, what's your point?

Please, tell us when she was Indian when it suits her? When she attended Howard University? Where in her political career was she Indian when it suited her? Please share with us some evidence to support Trump's claims? Maybe there were moments when she acknowledged her Indian parentage. But she has consistently presented herself as a Black American. On the other hand, It's consistently been right wingers like you who have challenged her claim to be a Black American by pointing to her Indian heritage.

I guess you think that aggression being closer to home makes it okay?

Not only is she not black according to you, but now she's not American. Racist much?

Like the polls from those Marxists at Fox News? https://www.foxnews.com/official-polls/fox-news-poll-supreme-court-approval-rating-drops-record-low

What ought be noted is how polling fared after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. In special elections subsequent to that decision, Democratic candidates consistently outperformed the pollsters' predictions. Democrats Are Trailing Everywhere But at the Ballot Box Democrats aren’t getting a lot of encouraging news from 2024 opinion polls these days. But elections are painting a much different picture. https://www.usnews.com/news/the-report/articles/2024-02-16/democrats-are-trailing-everywhere-but-at-the-ballot-box

Harris never changed her identification with being black. She always identified as such. She attended Howard University. It's right wingers like you who are confused.Just because, in your judgement she isn't really black, that has nothing to do with whether or not she has always self-identified as such. The claim advanced by Trump that she switched her identification is blatantly false.

According to the article, the nasal vaccine in question is already being used in India.

Great idea. A negotiator prioritized himself over the interests of the group he represents. This is comedy gold.

And where in those far flung corners of the world is the US attempting to claim foreign territory as its own?

More of the same obfuscation.

You called Soros a Kapo. Is there some other kind of Kapo? "A kapo or prisoner functionary (German: Funktionshäftling) was a prisoner in a Nazi camp who was assigned by the Schutzstaffel (SS) guards to supervise forced labor or carry out administrative tasks. Also called "prisoner self-administration", the prisoner functionary system minimized costs by allowing camps to function with fewer SS personnel. The system was designed to turn victim against victim, as the prisoner functionaries were pitted against their fellow prisoners in order to maintain the favor of their SS overseers." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapo#:~:text=A kapo or prisoner functionary,Kapo Got any definition from a credible source that says differently?

What a brilliant negotiating tactic! If we judge that you're not trying hard enough, we'll kill you. It is to laugh.

A new study by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis indicates that next-generation vaccines that target the virus’s points of entry — the nose and mouth — may be able to do what traditional shots cannot: contain the spread of respiratory infections and prevent transmission. Using a nasal COVID-19 vaccine based on Washington University technology, approved for use in India and licensed to Ocugen for further development in the U.S., the researchers showed that vaccinated hamsters that developed infections did not pass the virus on to others, breaking the cycle of transmission. In contrast, an approved COVID-19 vaccine that is injected failed to prevent the spread of the virus. https://medicine.wustl.edu/news/nasal-covid-19-vaccine-halts-transmission/

More of the same. Claiming it's in relation but not explaining how it's in relation. You've got nothing.

Thanks for the mindreading comments.

The specification is a credible source. www.ngo-monitor is not that. I actually followed the links they offered. Those links don't support their claims or yours: NGO Monitor (Non-governmental Organization Monitor) is a right-wing non-governmental organization based in Jerusalem that reports on international NGO activity from a pro-Israel perspective.[4][5][6][7] The organization was founded in 2001 by Gerald M. Steinberg under the auspices of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, before becoming a legally and financially independent organization in 2007.[citation needed] NGO Monitor has been criticized by academic figures, diplomats, and journalists for allowing its research and conclusions to be driven by politics,[8][9][10] for not examining right-wing NGOs,[10] and for spreading misinformation.[11] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGO_Monitor And you still haven't offered even bad evidence that Soros was a Kapo.

Killing a truce negotiator is a surefire way to demonstrate Netanyahu's desire for peace. Who was Ismail Haniyeh, the Hamas political leader killed in Tehran? As Hamas’s political leader, he was a key interlocutor with international mediators during stalled hostage and ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas, following the group’s October 7 attack on Israel. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/31/middleeast/ismail-haniyeh-death-hamas-profile-intl-hnk/index.html

Please share with us evidence from a credible source that George Soros has the same agenda as does Hamas: "Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source." https://aseannow.com/forum/158-world-news/ Whether or not my definition of Kapo is simplistic, you have provided 0 evidence to support your claim. The gist of the forum rule can be summarized as put up or...

For those who don't know what a "Kapo" is, in WW2 it meant a Jew who helped the Nazis corral and exterminate fellow Jews. Now, that I've cleared that up, please share with us any credible evidence you have to support that claim. From the landing page of the World News Forum: "Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source." https://aseannow.com/forum/158-world-news/ I advise anyone awaiting the production of such evidence from Yagoda not to hold your breath.

Clearly, Netanyahu is sincerely interested in pursuing peace negotiations. Oh, wait a minute... Ismail Haniyeh, a Top Hamas Leader, Is Dead at 62 Mr. Haniyeh, the militant group’s exiled political chief, managed high-stakes negotiations, including the ongoing cease-fire talks to end the war in Gaza. https://archive.ph/bYj07

In fact, there is a huge amount of actual verifiable evidence the contradicts youreavinalaff's claims. I don't understand why some people believe that alleging facts based on personal experience on issues of public policy is valid evidence. That kind of personal unconfirmable "evidence", if it can be dignified as such, should be reserved for forums about home repairs and similar forums.

If you have a genuine objection, you should back up that claim with reasoning.

"They are not dissatisfied with the NHS, they just don't like the wait." Thanks for the laugh. I could just see some company claiming, "We're not losing custom because shoppers are dissatisfied with our offerings. They just don't like waiting in long, slow lines."

Here's your question again: Was your reply based on the fact that private insurance isn't technically paying doctors? That it's the insurers who pay? That's a pretty misleading reed on which to anchor your argument. The point being of course, that a rising number of Britons are so dissatisfied with the NHS that they are paying additional funds out of their own pockets to patronize private care. But even by that misleading standard of yours, according to the article, private payments directly to doctors have also risen to record levels.