placeholder

You claimed he won an overwhelming majority victory and that the American people overwhelmingly support him. Trump got the most popular votes but not a majority. How do you bounce from that to the claim that the overwhelming majority of the American people support him?

Why are you defending a lie? Or rather given the source, why are you defending a falsehood based on ignorance? Once again here's what was written: "Trump won the election with an overwhelming majority landslide victory. The way he chooses to look at possible fraud in the Social Security administration is up to him, the American people overwhelmingly support him regardless of what is reflected on this site of mostly non Americans spouting off due to their hatred of Elon Musk (great American btw) and President Trump."

Trump didn't even get a majority of the popular vote. Pretty ridiculous to claim that an overwhelming majority of the American people support him when he didn'teven get a majority of the popular vote. That's quite a bubble you live in.

His source is himself. He has specifically claimed that he favors what posters claim rather than links to facts.

The problem isn't about taking a look at it. It's about making false claims about what they found. Even the acting director of social security who was appointed by Trump, wouldn't back up their claims about millions of centenarians receiving social security.

Really?

One way to tell someone's got nothing is that they offer unverifiable evidence. Another is when they question someone else's nationality. You've got nothing. Twice.

Get over yourself.

They stopped going to the office. That didn't mean that they stopped working any more than it meant people in the private sector stopped working. And social security workers who worked the phones certainly don't need to come to the office. The year is 2025. Workers don't need access to the file cabinet anymore.

You mean if I were to kake claims that certain things were facts you would believe it? More proof of your inability to exercise critical thinking.

Thank you for confessing to being willfully ignorant.

Yes you are right about illegals paying into the system. But as for them taking out of it... How Unauthorized Immigrants Help Finance Social Security Benefits https://archive.ph/TOyl8

Clearly, you are living in a bubble Tens of millions of dead people aren’t getting Social Security checks, despite Trump and Musk claimshttps://apnews.com/article/social-security-payments-deceased-false-claims-doge-ed2885f5769f368853ac3615b4852cf7

Why DOGE is struggling to find fraud in Social Security https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-doge-struggling-fraud-social-132603335.html

If "herty words" equals "pathological lying", then you have a point Connecticut jury orders Alex Jones to pay nearly $1 billion to Sandy Hook families The award is the largest the Texas conspiracy theorist has been ordered to pay as part of three defamation lawsuits against him for falsely claiming that the 2012 school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, was a hoax. https://www.texastribune.org/2022/10/12/alex-jones-sandy-hook-shooting/

Clearly, your crush on me has subverted your power of reason. I'm flattered, of course, but this topic isn't about me.

Objects exhibiting advanced technology continue to fly with complete impunity over sensitive military installations and critical infrastructure. Despite the Pentagon’s advanced imaging and sensor capabilities, the nature, purpose and origin of these enigmatic craft are unknown, raising an array of pressing national security concerns. In interviews with “60 Minutes” earlier this month, two recently retired four-star Air Force generals and the Air Force commander overseeing North American airspace defense begrudgingly admitted that the “drones” that loitered in dramatic fashion over key military assets in recent years remain a confounding mystery. https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/5211562-pentagon-mystified-as-drone-drama-deepens/

Elon Musk put a big target on the Social Security Administration in the first weeks of the Trump administration, claiming it is plagued by “immense waste” and promising audits to root out “the extreme levels of fraud.” President Donald Trump said during his joint address to Congress earlier this month that Musk’s U.S. DOGE Service was already “identifying shocking levels of incompetence and probable fraud” at the agency. But some of the biggest examples of allegedly wasteful spending held up by Musk and DOGE so far have been overblown or inaccurate. Musk’s assertion that tens of millions of dead people over 100 years old are receiving Social Security benefits was so off-base that it had to be tamped down by the agency’s acting head, who had been promoted because of his willingness to cooperate with DOGE. “These individuals are not necessarily receiving benefits,” acting Social Security commissioner Lee Dudek said. https://archive.ph/iAMdN

The Social Security Administration website crashed four times in 10 days this month, blocking millions of retirees and disabled Americans from logging in to their online accounts because the servers were overloaded. In the field, office managers have resorted to answering phones at the front desk as receptionists because so many employees have been pushed out. But the agency no longer has a system to monitor customers’ experience with these services, because that office was eliminated as part of the cost-cutting efforts led by Elon Musk. https://archive.ph/ezNjk

European universities have begun recruiting researchers who lost their jobs in the administration’s cost-cutting efforts, or are anxious over perceived threats to academic freedom. Since then, the university in the south of France known for its science programs, has received about a dozen applications per day from what the school considers “scientific asylum” seekers. Other universities in France and elsewhere in Europe have also rushed to save American researchers fleeing drastic cuts to jobs and programs by the Trump administration, as well as perceived attacks on whole fields of research. https://archive.ph/rqzwX

Social Security rushing service cuts at White House request, sources say The Social Security Administration is rushing cuts to phone services at the White House's request, the agency's acting commissioner told Social Security advocates in a meeting on Monday, two sources who attended tell Axios. Why it matters: These changes will strain the already struggling Social Security system and could even deprive some people of benefits entirely, according to current and former employees and advocates for retirees. Some of the most vulnerable Americans — including people who are hospitalized, kids in foster homes and those living in remote areas — will face more hurdles applying for disability benefits, according to one advocate who spoke with Axios and was at the meeting. https://www.axios.com/2025/03/24/social-security-cuts-doge

You're making an excellent point. Now, if Trump was a president of the United States,, your comment would be ridiculous... Oh wait a minute...

It looks like this form has its own version of Alex Jones.

Actually, it's more like you have a serious obsession with me.

Because massively cutting enforcement staff is not going to have a big effect on revenues? And knowledge that this is going to happen won't affect taxpayer behavior? How's the weather in your alternative universe?