Danderman123

Trump fluffers here may believe you, but no normal person would believe that a person indicted in 4 different court districts for 91 felonies is the victim of political persecution. 4 different grand juries indicted Trump, based on the evidence, not political instructions.

More on Russian nukes in space: A ground based satellite killer will be flown over by a target satellite once every 2 days or so. A space based satellite killer may not "see" a target for weeks or month, due to orbital mechanics.

Maybe Fani Willis only paid partially for the meals and trips. So she should be partially disqualified. Seriously, given her income, the idea that she hired someone so she could get some free meals is pretty crazy.

The second day is going badly for Trump. Fani Willis' father lives with her and says he never met Nathan Wade until 2023. Supposedly, Fani Willis had a different boyfriend in 2019.

in what case is Trump charged with bribery?

You have a weakness for Putin.

Unfortunately for you, there is no evidence to support your fantasy. More to the point, you don't seem to know anything about Ukraine, Biden, or the people who feed your talking points: Former FBI informant charged with lying about the Bidens’ role in Ukraine business Your statement is based on fraudulent Russian claims.

Based on the hearing yesterday, no.

The hearing seems to have gone poorly for Trump, as evidenced by the lack of comments from the Trump fluffers here. In the Real World, there are a lot of reactions from women, who are new Fani Willis supporters. The hearings seem to have struck a nerve. Lots of style points for Ms. Willis. The one witness against Fani Willis didn't seem to have a lot of credibility, especially given the circumstances of her firing by Fani Willis.

If convicted, he will lose some votes from independents. There's always the possibility that Melania will kill Trump after Stormy Daniels testifies.

No evidence to support your post has been produced by the Committee.

FBI informant charged with lying about Joe and Hunter Biden's ties to Ukrainian firm Ask and ye shall receive

Nope. You are confused over the term "warming". Better to use "increased warming". You have no idea why the planet has seen increased warming over the last 100 years. Your internet masters have not sent you talking points to explain the current warming, so you are helpless. The Sun goes through cycles of increased output, which increase warming on Earth. We are currently in a period of decreased solar output. So, what other natural forces do you believe are causing increased warming?

So, what's your position on Global Warming?

You answer my question first, and then I will answer yours (if you care to know why the Earth warmed in the past). It is bad form to answer a question with a question. What natural forces do you believe are warming the planet now?

Say, don't the MAGA types live to "own the Libs"? As for glee in ruining Trump's life, I would say his wounds were self inflicted.

I personally don't blame the Conservatives for this. Once Brexit passed, disruptions to the British economy were inevitable. The Conservatives had the bad luck of being in power at the wrong time. If Labor can't turn the economy around, they will be gone soon.

No. Voter fraud in favor of Joe Biden would be wrong. Fortunately, you can't provide evidence of any such voter fraud. You would have more luck finding evidence of UFOs.

Planetary warming has to be caused by something. The warming properties of CO2 are well established. If something else is causing the warming, what is it? You lose 2 points if you say "the sun".

Sorry, but your FD1023 was based on lies from a Russian informant who has now been indicted.

The Deniers now admit there is warming. But they claim its from "natural forces".

maybe you have held your position so long, you can't remember it. Everyone can see your reluctance to state your position. More trolling on your part.

LASERs are better ground based for many reasons. And an orbital LASER has another name: "target". Same with the space nukes.

Clearly, you are misinformed. The Dems favored point defense, Reagan had dreams of an orbital based shield, but it was infeasible. I knew the guys who convinced Reagan to do Star Wars, they just wanted a reason to launch a lot of rockets. The one concrete benefit of SDI was the DC-X test vehicle, which demonstrated vertical rocket landing. I was a big fan.