Danderman123

First, let me make an observation: Most Deniers here don't seem to understand the basics of climatology, they are just supplied carbon dio with talking points, and post them here. They don't seem to know that their talking points display an ignorance of high school science. Getting to the point, human produced carbon dioxide is generating so much warming that it overwhelms the natural forces cooling the planet. Its like trying to use air conditioning while your house is on fire, the warming more than cancels the cooling. But don't take my word for it, here is NASA's take: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/blogs/climateqa/if-earth-has-warmed-and-cooled-throughout-history-what-makes-scientists-think-that-humans-are-causing-global-warming-now/

It was just some random guy, and he backed down already.

Great. Describe the natural forces that are causing the current warming, and show that they are increasing.

Your question is irrelevant to this topic, and why Greenland is losing ice. If you don't believe that human pollution is causing warming, why worry about private jets? It's like catching a police chief speeding, it doesn't mean the speed limit doesn't exist.

It's likely that the Houthis can't identify their targets, they see a blip on the radar.

There have in the past been natural forces, such as changes in the Earth's axial tilt, that impact global temperature. To the extent that these forces are in play now, they tend to cool the planet. Other natural forces include asteroids hitting the planet, debris from nearby supernovas, changes in solar output, etc. Nothing natural explains the current warming. If you can find a natural force that explains the current warming, there's a Nobel Prize waiting for you.

Greenhouse gases can warm or cool the atmosphere. Increase greenhouse gases, and the atmosphere warms. Decrease greenhouse gases, and the atmosphere cools. This is not rocket science. This was figured out 200 years ago. If you can disprove this, there's a Nobel prize waiting for you. Talking about Lee Harvey Oswald won't do it.

I think Assange is a true believer who will never cooperate. Plus, if he cooperates, there may be some Polonium tea waiting for him.

When all you post is gibberish, you convince no one.

Why is Cloud Cover warming the planet now, compared to 100 years ago? Weren't there clouds during the Ice Ages? Your post shows a lack of critical thinking. You are regurgitating stupid talking points.

You not helping anyone with your answer. Are you ashamed to agree or disagre? If you agree that Carbon Dioxide is a greenhouse gas, the other Deniers might ridicule you. If you disagree, you are saying you flunked Science.

DOJ has always maintained that retention of classified documents and refusing to give them back is a crime. Returning the documents when they are discovered mitigates the crime. Trump refused to return all of the classified documents. That's a crime.

Here is some good news for Trump fans! The improving economy under Biden means that you have more cash to donate to Trump.

Older scientists outside the field of atmospheric physics sometimes invoke the "cloud cover" theory to explain Global Warming. But they forget to explain why there is increased warming from cloud cover (ie, why there is more cloud cover). Because a warmer atmosophere supports more water vapor in the atmosphere). Big fail for the old guys.

so, do you understand that Carbon Dioxide is a greenhouse gas?

Hey, Deniers! Any of you agree that the current warming caused by "natural cycles"? This is your chance to show your knowledge of science (or lack thereof).

We are in a natural cooling cycle, since the Interglacial Maximum 8,000 years ago. That's why the Sahara went from green just a few thousand years ago, to a desert today. You will not find a reputable scientist who says that we are in a natural warming cycle. Try again. But, you are just demonstrating to everyone here that you are misinformed on this subject.

I don't have a problem with people protesting. That's what Democracy is about. Peaceful Protesters Tear-Gassed To Clear Way For Trump Church Photo-Op

Paul Manafort handed a Kremlin agent Trump campaign polls that allowed Russians to micro-target voters in swing districts. Russian hackers were able to download emails from Clinton campaign staff and publish damaging emails on the Internet. The head FBI agent at SDNY "discovered" emails on Anthony Weiner's laptop a week before the election. Although the emails were a nothingburger, the announcement prompted a dip in the polls for Clinton. Of course, the head FBI agent has been arrested for being on the payroll of a Russian oligarch. "Russia, if you are out there listening....." Grand Jury Indicts 12 Russian Officers for Hacking Offenses Related to the 2016 Election This is all common knowledge. The more you know, the less you will support Trump.

It would be easy for a Denier to prove that human produced Carbon Dioxide isn't the cause of the current warming: Show another source of increased carbon dioxide. Show increased solar output. Show changes to the Earth's orbital parameters that are currently causing warm. Show a wizard who is casting warming spells. To the extent that the Deniers can't do this, they are wrong.

The first step in solving a problem is to recognize that there is a problem. In this case, the problem is that human produced carbon dioxide is warming the atmosphere. Although you admit that the atmosphere is warming, you disagree that human produced Carbon Dioxide is the primary cause. So, it's impossible to discuss solutions with you, if you don't recognize the cause of the problem.

The atmosphere is being warmed by human produced Carbon Dioxide. Your job is to raise doubts about the reality of Global Warming.

These 2 reports are long debunked. The 1998 report stated there was low confidence about future warming, and was totally wrong. If you are relying on these 2 reports for your basis for Global Warming denial, you are not only wrong, but alone. Modern Deniers use more current techniques than relying on these obsolete junk science documents.

One very old trolling technique is to deflect from describing the problem of Global Warming and instead argue about solutions. After enough time has been wasted on solutions, then claim that the Global Warming problem doesn't exist. I suggest that discussion of solutions be moved to another topic.

Deniers come in all flavors, including those who simply attempt to sow doubts about the Global Warming hypothesis. Sowing doubt was first used by the tobacco industry, but the oil companies picked up the technique: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doubt_Is_Their_Product