Danderman123

Old news. Your link is a week old.

Presidents are not allowed under the PRA to retain any official documents. Presidential archives are first placed under control of the National Archives. Trump violated the PRA by taking official documents from the White House to his residence in Florida.

I don't know why you write a long post, starting with a lie. Everyone stops reading after the first sentence. On November 2, 2022, Biden's attorneys discovered the first set of classified documents in a locked closet at the Penn Biden Center; they reported them that day to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), which retrieved them the next day.

Trump has installed his daughter-in-law as Vice Chair of the Republican National Committee. She has already announced that Trump will get the money that the RNC raises. This means the RNC won't be supporting candidates for the Senate and House, as they have in the past. The result is really going to hurt the GOP in November, since much of the money that Trump raises will be used to pay his lawyers.

As usual, you are misstating the facts. Biden's attorneys conducted a voluntary search, just to make sure that Biden didn't still have any classified documents. When they found some, they alerted the authorities immediately. On the other hand, Trump knew he had classified documents and tried to hide them. The true test of a Trump cult member is if they can't tell the difference between the two cases. A normal person would be amazed at the confusion by the members of the Cult of Trump over the two cases.

Nothing new there.

In a perfect world, Trump's lawyers will delay cases long enough that a guilty verdict comes in on November 1, or just before the election.

If Fani Willis is caught in lies in her court filings, she is history.

Tell you what, you can let us know if the Scott for VP buzz survives the SC primary.

As always, I have to state that early polls are not very accurate. Having said that, common sense indicates that some voters will be biased against voting for a felon.

and you will totally forget about your rule after this election.

You just defined special people as "anyone running for presidency" who has been indicted. When your special consideration only extends to one person on the planet, they are indeed special. So, "no one is above the law" except that one special person.

You want the trial delayed because Trump is special. He's not like another defendants.

"Trump's trials should be delayed until after the election" and "no one is above the law" are what is called "mutually exclusive" thoughts.

I will only be interested in Trump until he loses in November. Come to think of it, so will you.

Because he doesn't want to stand for election with convictions on his resume.

I guess you aren't keeping up with current events. Trump's lawyers are engaged in delaying tactics in many cases nothing to do with case dismissal. How many posts are you going to make that display your ignorance, and do you think these posts convince anyone?

On the contrary, Trump needs to win the election to pardon himself, so he can stay out of prison.

Ironically, you are describing Trump. More to the point, *you* believe Trump is above the law.

This is a very bad year for Trump. Expect major disappointments for you.

No bs. Lots of NASA contracts won by one of my companies, including a really big one to design the next space station. The other is totally private, but has contract with dozens of phone companies worldwide for smartphone to satellite services. We launch our next 2 satellites on or after March 1. As the founder, I realized the pitfalls of Founder Syndrome, and recruited capable management rather than do it myself. So, now I just dabble when I feel like it, and enjoy life.

If you believe Trump is innocent, you would want a quick trial.

Because, for you, Trump is special. Getting back to your proposal, if someone steals classified documents, can they eliminate or delay the charges by declaring they are running for president?

Some people ask me how I got into the space business. It was not a case of my being a college educated engineer and interviewing for a job. I was an itinerant guitar player, making my living in bar bands, when I developed an interest in space policy. This required me to study space engineering on my own, including Russian stuff. After a while, I became conversant in the engineering, and taught myself Russian. As a result, I was involved in passing legislation that enabled SpaceX, and was sent to Russia to rent the Mir space station. After that, I founded some space companies, we won NASA contracts, and the rest is history.

Reportedly, SpaceX will attempt a test launch of their Super Heavy rocket this month: https://www.space.com/space-starship-third-test-flight-three-weeks-elon-musk I have conflicting business interests for Super Heavy. One of my companies plan to use it as a launcher. Another competes against Super Heavy payloads (fortunately, the competition is not winner take all). So, whatever happens, I win. And lose.