Danderman123

please tell me what the House Republicans have done about illegal immigration. Just posting junk without any facts is worthless.

We are never going to enter Mexico to pursue cartels, and they aren't very involved in smuggling people - drugs are their main concern. There are already processing camps on the Mexican side of the border, I've seen them. As for Nixon, his border closing was a giant mess. It is irrelevant that he won re-election.

Biden's administration is catching more illegals than Trump did. What happened to that money that Mexico was going to give for building the Wall? Fail.

the closing of the ports of entry idea is a non-starter. First off, Republican donors would lose their cheap labor, and so that would never happen. Nixon tried it in 1971, and it was a mess.

how does it feel to believe politicians who get their funding from employers of illegal immigrants? To stop illegals is easy: go out in the fields, check their papers, arrest management, and work up the company ladder to detain anyone involved in human trafficking. But that would imprison Republican donors.

Trump's lawyers forgot to request a jury trial. Can you guess from the photo who made the mistake?

What does that mean? The reason for all that "extra" CO2 in the atmosphere is under debate? You mean, you don't believe that the sharp increase in CO2 is due to human pollution?

Our Afghanistan mistake resulted in 8,000 US deaths. Vietnam was the big one that cost 50,000 US lives.

Because the Wall wouldn't do much to stop illegal immigration. Under prior presidents, there already was a Wall built where it matters. Trump's idiot Wall would be built where nobody crosses.

But does nothing to stop illegal immigration, it's just a gimmick.

You don't get it: The vast majority of illegals come in via legal ports of entry, with fake papers. The big agriculture employers bring them in on school buses for the harvest, using third party recruiters. What would the Wall do to stop that?

Yeah, the usual Republican approach: lots of promises, very little action. He is playing you for a sucker.

Because illegal immigration has the effect of lowering wages. That's why detentions at the border increase during Democratic administrations. Conversely, Republican talk about illegal immigration, but never do anything about it. Yes, they are fooling you. The vast majority of illegals come in via major ports of entry to work the big farms, with fake papers. The owners of those farms are big donors to the Republicans. If you believe the Republicans on immigration, you are a sucker.

Democrats oppose illegal immigration.

The logical conclusion of the positions of some posters is that being gay is likewise a mental illness. It's slippery slope time.

There is nothing wrong with an adult electing to have trans surgery. Do you disagree?

Nobody worships Mohammad. BTW, ever seen a Muslim bargirl in Thailand?

Negritos are not Africans. They are East Asians genetically.

What crazy dictators do.

It's possible a Trump loss would prompt a Russian evacuation from Ukraine.

Not a stalemate, one side has reached culmination, another is advancing. But, it will take some time for Russia to lose complete combat ineffectiveness.

I agree that children under 18 should not have such surgery, unless there is some potentially fatal issue. But, my understanding is that such surgeries are rare.

Ukraine will continue to receive US funding, and will win the war with Russia.

You're still waiting for Trump's healthcare plan, right? How about Infrastructure week? Or the proof the 2020 election was stolen....

The T-72B3, a product of Uralvagonzavod in Nizhny Tagil, is one of Russia’s newer tanks. And unlike, say, the T-64BV, the T-80U or the T-72AMT, Ukrainian industry doesn’t have much experience with the type. So when a Ukrainian tanker with the callsign “Kochevnik” ran into problems with his captured Russian T-72B3—problems local expertise couldn’t immediately solve—he called Uralvagonzavod tech support. And incredibly, the help line actually helped.