Morch

The legal expert have spoken....if Israel would not tell them to evacuate, it would be a war crime. Warning civilians is one of them things armies are supposed to do. Most do not bother.

What is it with you wannabe 'pro-palestinian' posters and them over-simplistic analogies? Again, and as always, your opinion is based on faulty knowledge, and is mostly nonsense.

Israel is nor forcibly occupying it's territory. There was that 1947 UN vote. Maybe you heard about it. Similarly, Israel is not trying to occupy the Gaza Strip. Learn the facts, then twist them.

Remember the late Rabin? That Prime Minister of Israel (which you labeled as a Palestinian leader)? He was a Zionist. You described him as a man of peace or something. But he was also the Chief of the IDF at one time, Minister of Defense and so on. And that's just one example. Being a Zionist is not quite what you imagine. It's a wide enough definition which allows for multiple points of view. Not all of them have to do with extremism, religious views, or expansion. Equating Zionism with Hamas's ideology is nonsense - Hamas does not have anything resembling this range of views and positions. Do you have any practical views on what Israel should be doing differently when fighting Hamas? Or does all you can come with is pointing out how not to? What you believe is immaterial - and warning civilians is actually an existing provision. If it was not done, you'd have more of a point regarding possible war crimes. You linked an article from 2021, well done. Maybe try for something more updates - the chief ICC prosecutor actually visited Israel shortly after the war started. This was covered on topics here back when.

Your labels are the product of ignorance. Zionists can be left-wing, pro-peace, secular, and against the government - but still serve in the IDF, and/or fight in the Gaza Strip. That's not an opinion - these are facts. Same goes for your contrived nonsense regarding Hamas - All of the Hamas men are Palestinians. There are no non-Palestinian Hamas members.

You are welcome to come up with any excuse for trolling. That's the done thing on this forum. And obviously, one can find whatever on the internet. The fact that there is a 'debate' doesn't mean a whole lot, though. There are plenty of 'debates' on this forum, for example, maybe an iota is meaningful on a good day. And sure you can find Holocaust survivor who will say this, and Holocaust survivors who would say something different - it's not like they all have the same views or same experiences. You may wish to have a read of Barak's (the Israeli judge appointed for the ICJ hearing, and a Holocaust survivor) words on the issues at hand, it was linked on at least one of these topics).

@ozimoron Yay....you found another tidbit from only 8 years ago...well done. This, of course have nothing to with the baiting question asked, but hey.....guess you just had to.

I'm surprised that you do not know that in Judaism there's a provision for doing things normally forbidden on s Saturday under certain circumstances. War time, emergencies etc. would qualify. Rabbits driving to other provinces would not.

No, I do not. Both times we just went there and told them what I need, and they knew what's to be done. As for pictures, no - they'll take your pic on the spot. Also, I think you can walk in, but depending on hour and location, this can be a long wait. In our case, a non-issue. Different in Bangkok.

Here's what you posted: I don't think the case would help secure the latter group's vote. Might even have a negative effect.

Stop making stupid comments, trolling and you will not be called names. Very easy. Considering you cannot bring yourself to even refer to Israelis as Israelis, your whining seems ridiculous.

Why don't you go along and start another nothing topic about 'balance in life'?

You copied a rhetorical question, chopped of the main body of the post with the reply. You're lying, it's what trolls do.

Are you a suburban mom?

You're lie, it's what trolls do. You've just copied the opening bit, and dropped the body of the reply.

Already commented on this just above, to another poster. Guess trolls got a limited attention span.

That comment made you sound like these guys:

That E. Jean Carroll case is sure to help. Or not.

I considered your 'opinions', I found them lacking. I commented on that. You were not, in any way, prevented from airing your silly 'opinions'. Troll harder.

You do not get to decide what are the 'obvious points' and then chop my posts off to your liking. Again, that's both dishonest and against forum rules. Apparently you expect your points to be addressed, but cherry picking is alright when you reply. I don't think that it's a time issue, but that you cannot actually address what I posted in a serious manner. All you have are memes. No I have not missed Netanyahu's words. I also notice that when it suits, people say his words are worthless, and other times treat them as solid. Guess what? This predates Netanyahu, and even if wasn't for this - it still doesn't answer the question of why you think the Palestinians are a secondary player in this. Beyond bizarre.

No, we do not, that's just more of your trolling. You said Hamas might release the hostages if there's a ceasefire. I think otherwise. My opinions, as opposed to yours, are more grounded in fact and reality.

There was no report about everyone being bombed, and the ICJ did not say that either. Your lying. Now whine about being called a troll, troll.

Oh, so we do not agree, then. Not quite. I think there's very little chance Hamas will release women hostages who were sexually abused, for example. They'd claim them dead, buried under rubble, never in their possession and so on.

US sets up channel with Israel to discuss reports of civilian casualties in Gaza https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-operating-channel-with-israel-to-discuss-reports-of-civilian-casualties-in-gaza/ Before some of you get excited, pay attention to details - this is not a reaction to the ICJ provisional ruling, but something which was actually set up earlier this month, during or after Blinken's visit to Israel.