stevenl

Not at all, thanks for your concern.

Yes?

Yes, and?

Yes, plenty of evidence. That's why the impeachment enquiry was able to come up with so much proof and has advanced successfully.

Lol, see Nick's post. But you and many others have always maintained it started October 7. A convenient pov, but not realistic.

For a ceasefire to exist there needs to be a war. You and many others have always stated October 7 was the start of the conflict, but now you're saying there was a war already.

Since following the discussion is clearly not easy for you, hereby the post

That's what your buddy claimed Interjecting in a discussion without knowing the discussion is not a good idea.

Yes agree, the judge should have protected Trump by taking him into custody there by preventing him from seeking publicity.

Please show me where I made a claim about the appeal. You however made this claim "The gag order will be reversed on appeal". According to your reasoning this opinion requires knowledge of NY appellate law. Looking forward to your expertise.

That's rich, asking for proof of expertise after having made the original claim without any of that.

First remove the fossil subsidies.

In California the occupations are continuing. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-04-30/ucla-moves-to-shut-down-pro-palestinian-encampment-as-unlawful

I would trust international sources over the IDF you prefer.

See the comments, people don't even realize they're being played.

Motorbike taxi will happily arrange for you.

He has to. At first he thought Kennedy would take votes from Biden, now he realizes he's taking votes from Trump.

Just report it to the Phuket police, patong police will happily pay them a visit.

See the hypocrisy in your post? Never mind, you won't.

It doesn't have to go away. You did what you, Bob and nick to consistently: quoting and then deducting views from that quote that totally misrepresent what was said or meant.

So you don't care about the bike rider because they all drive too fast and wouldn't check on you if the roles were reversed.

Car is at fault, speed of bike is irrelevant except for, in theory, a fine.

The speed limit there is 50. So from your expert opinion he was riding within the limit. His speed is irrelevant anyway as the car is at fault.

Which bike?

With the exception of Hong Kong no Bricks countries in the biggest export countries for China.