stevenl

No we are not.

A failed politician, tossed by her own party, without any self reflection at all. Why anyone would listen to her I don't know.

I would be very surprised if a clear answer is forthcoming.

He doesn't have to be objective, he is executing US foreign policy.

This 'october 7 happened in a vacuum ' again And no, that's not an excuse for what happened on October 7, there is no excuse.

I quoted yours, so no twisting at all.

Yes, logical thinking is a challenge for you.

Why is that?

No, you misunderstood his first post and keep on banging on with that misinterpretation.

Hezbollah most likely, not Iran. And no, that's not the same.

See your quote in my post. "Do you think they had permission, I can't think of any other way a foreign country would fly over another country without permission, unless at war with that country of course." They flew over Syria so must have had Syrian permission according to your reasoning. Now all know that's not correct, so your post was incorrect.

So you're saying Israel obtained permission from Syria to attack the Iranian embassy compound in Syria.

So? Recent terrorist attack. And no, there are no confusing messages here.

More recent anders breivik.

None, see earlier posts about the difference in law. My post was about the bombing, not the distinction.

Same answer to a post that can be made to all your posts here and everyone else's.

That's what I thought, you don't care. International law does care, but the law won't have any consequences for Israel. But other consequences are very visible now.

Was it part of the embassy compound or not. According to many media outlets it was, you seem to be avoiding the issue.

I think the consulate was part of the embassy compound. If correct that makes the difference irrelevant.

I am not part of a lot nor do I think there is a pro Hamas mob. And I am not getting into discussing removed posts.

Here we go again, trying to accuse posters of anti-Semitism.

Disagreeing with Israel's actions doesn't equate supporting Hamas or anyone else involved.

"Trump entering into an NDA with Stormy. ". Which is not the issue.

Thanks for showing that contradicting one of the gang is contradicting all 3.

You know Russian, most of them anyway are farang?