SunnyinBangrak

If Bobulinski was lying and it was all made up(which NOBODY is claiming!), would Joe Biden not have sued him? I would have and Im not even a public figure.

"Bobulinski has also identified Joe Biden as “the big guy” referenced in emails related to the Chinese deal that were uncovered on the first son’s infamous abandoned laptop, which were revealed by The Post in October 2020. “The good news is Congressman [James] Comer and Congressman [Jim] Jordan have troves of documents that will corroborate all this — but 1,000%, Joe Biden is ‘the big guy,’” Bobulinski said Thursday." https://nypost.com/2022/11/18/ex-hunter-biden-biz-partner-hails-gop-probe-into-first-sons-deals/ This is direct and corroborated evidence that Joe Biden, was indeed, the "big guy" that was taking a cut of these deals with the Chinese and others. If, as alleged, Joe Biden was indeed taking 10% or any amount from these deals the left swore blind did not happen, then clearly that would be breaking laws - such as tax evasion for starters. Just think how the narrative has changed. If that doesn't scream insincerity nothing does. From 1)Laptop doesn't exist. to 2)Laptop exists but is Russian Disinformation 3)Ok well the laptop was Hunters, but there is nothing anywhere about Joe Biden in there. to 4) Well OK , Joe Biden did actually meet these despots we were forced to accept he didn't, but he did not personally profit from it. 5)we all know what happens next!

No. He really did not. It is a popular conspiracy theory among the left, who have been conditioned by their MSM outrage reporting to blindly swallow ridiculous claims like this without question. The 30,000 lie claim has been comprehensively debunked as many of the claims were true( I would normally include a link easily and with humour debunking a few of the prominent "lies", yet it has been getting removed recently, so I will not bother. I would also say his "lies" such as remembering the weather wrong on inauguration day were not self serving intentional lies, such as dishonestly denying evidence of corruption.

Great news, I was concerned she was going to walk.

A link please from the WSJ stating they investigated TB's evidence and found nothing incriminating. You can't, because TB has concrete evidence and testimony that crimes took place. He is copied in on the emails, he was a business partner of Biden inc. His testimony is damning. Nobody calls him a liar.

Both sides do it equally. For example "fact-checking under President Trump was a bustling business. Seemingly every day, and sometimes by the hour, the 45th president’s every word was scrutinized, which all comes with the job. But under President Biden, fact checkers are enjoying what feels like extended vacations or have simply checked out in terms of scrutinizing the many ways that he is misleading the public." https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/3647706-why-has-fact-checking-disappeared-under-biden/ or https://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/fiery-but-mostly-peaceful-cnn-torn-apart-over-embarrassing-caption/O3B3JY7YNUIJXROLHX63MQPE2M/ It's called bias. Every media outlet has it to some degree. Interesting that Fox is singled out, they are no where near the worst at it.

We don't understand why, when Pelosi was able to open the door for the police, that he did not remove himself from the "dangerous" situation and exit the house to the safety of the police.

Spot on, as recent news again highlights. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-17/bankman-fried-turns-toxic-in-congress-even-among-those-he-backed We need this dark money out of politics for good.

Can you accept that Hunter leaving his laptop with all the emails at JP McIsaac's shop in 2019 could be rather helpful in a new inquiry? Having the fully corroborated emails, how the $ get divvied up, corroborated by those CC'd on the email is very serious evidence, and will be hard to weasel out of.

from the OP "But top Republicans insist their inquiry will determine the extent of Joe Biden's alleged involvement in his son's business dealings, including during the elder Biden's time as vice-president." His family are part of the story but not central. What is concerning Republicans is that you have a thoroughly compromised president and a massive security risk. This is urgent work.

This is no longer about Hunter. We have crossed the Rubicon. This is now about President Joe Biden and his alleged corruption.

Can we give him some time to turnaround the failing company before reaching judgement? Musk will run the company for profit, so naturally some changes will have to be made. I just find it hard to understand how some observers are so upset and angry that staff on $150k a year need free meals. I looked at the Twitter HQ on google maps there are tons of restaurants surrounding. Nobody will starve.

Joe Biden never discussed business with his son or his sons associates.

The Politico article clearly demonstrates how dodgy they are, going back years. We didn't have the laptop back then so the more juicy recent stuff which was censored by dem supporting big tech wasn't known. The evidence is now damning and is fully corroborated and not denied by the Bidens. The narrative that Joe never discussed business with his son(or his sons dodgy foreign business associates) is over.

You know full well there is more to the Biden/Burisma/Shokin/Son of a ___ he got fired!/Trump impeachment than a simple guy doing private business. We are going to get to the bottom of it. I suspect it will be very painful for some having their conspiracy theories upended.

False. "After Paradigm, James Biden landed a new gig. Despite a lack of experience in the construction industry, he was named an executive vice president at HillStone International, a subsidiary of New Jersey-based construction firm Hill International, in November 2010. In June 2011, the firm landed contracts worth an estimated $1.5 billion to build homes in Iraq. At the time, HillStone had little homebuilding experience. Joe Biden was leading the administration’s Iraq policy. " https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/08/02/joe-biden-investigation-hunter-brother-hedge-fund-money-2020-campaign-227407/

I honestly thought with the misinformation, the coverup and the censorship he would get away with this, perhaps not! Thank you midterm voters. I would not have let this man send a single solitary $ to the Ukraine until the alleged conflict of interest was investigated.

Yes, there are many that enriched themselves but I do not believe this thread is another rant on Trump thread? Let's try and stay focused on the topic at hand for once. The Pelosis famously made some incredible trades in companies such as nvidia before important price sensitive legislation was passed.

You did not watch EVENKEEL's video did you?

Yes of course. I do not support corruption or insider trading in any way shape or form.

If it doesn't include their close family relatives or using companies to shelter scrutiny there is not much point is there?

We were called "conspiracy theorists" for asking valid questions remember? Good to see we were not wrong. I suspected after the mid terms were out of the way and political mileage had been milked to the max by the democrats that interesting details would be made available concerning the events that made zero sense as presented.

" Surely, it's not illegal to leave France?" Just off the top of my head 1)as the boats are taking paying customers - captain does not hold valid commercial skippers license. 2)vessel does not comply with EU and UK safety regulations in terms of boat being overloaded, ill equipped with nav equipment, vessel not licensed for commercial passenger operations. 3)considering the above - it is likely the boats are not insured at all. So clearly very illegal. I also do not think most passengers are from Syria. They are often from North African countries and Pakistan/Bangladesh. The % of Syrians is not high.

I wish her a happy retirement, but I think the BBC is wrong about Hakeem Jeffries taking over as leader. That would not be a logical choice seeing as he is a renowned election denier - something of a hot topic among democrats in recent times. BBC claim "New York congressman Hakeem Jeffries is widely expected to take up the top Democratic leadership post in the House, which would make him the first black congressional leader in US history." Yet from Mr Jeffries own Twitter account he said - which no democrat would put up with someone with an anti-democracy stance like that