Sparktrader

200m husbands?

He was in airport I just saw him in airport with a tall ladyboy, maybe that was you

Bored with women Not into ladyboys Whats next? Play with dogz

Sean Co nery on board

So what does the computer do?

Put drunks in jail

2045 lol

Situation Family with dog and small child left side of road Old person with 2 dogs right side How does a computer weight this info if it has to swerve to miss a person in the middle of the road and that person is handicapped?

At levels 1,2,3. Computers long way off level 5.

"The world’s biggest auto manufacturers have poured billions of dollars into trying to perfect the technology. Despite impressive results, autonomous driving technology still can’t be relied on to handle really complex situations, and won’t any time soon." https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilwinton/2022/02/27/computer-driven-autos-still-years-away-despite-massive-investment/ Too bad facts get in the way of people dreaming

Do some research https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilwinton/2022/02/27/computer-driven-autos-still-years-away-despite-massive-investment/

Keep up with what? Where is your data for 100,000 cars on the road driven by computers?

I dont, words relate to you not me. A computer code cant factor in all variables.

In 1/3 of a second? Think about it 5 dogs 5 children all different ages 20 adults 10 old people 10 trees 5 buildings You really think a program has it covered?

The opposite is true. Ive driven battery cars mostly junk and less safe than petrol cars.

How does a computer differ between a small child and a dog? Better to kill a dog than swerve and kill a child.

Yes I know. Detecting rain isnt the issue. Its the combination of issues 4,5,6,7 variables. How do you weight those issues in importance? Dog Child Rain Pot hole Tree Building Curve in road Car on wrong side of road You CANNOT WRITE A PROGRAM with CORRECT WEIGHTING OF RISKS FOR ALL VARIABLES. Painfully obvious people need to think about it.

1 there are no facts to support your claim 2 there is more money in it which is why they are being developed 3 at least do some research on the topic before making strong statements

Those are partially useful. Not in total control. They sometimes locked up and fail too. At least do some research on the topic before commenting.

Maybe god is in all humans

Shouldn’t ADS developers be required to prove an ADS is at least as safe as a human driver for a specific ODD before allowing it out onto public roads? This lack of regulation has the potential to turn our roads into a vast experiment with disastrous consequences. (Steve Shwartz began his AI career as a postdoctoral researcher in the Yale University Computer Science Department in 1979 and has been a founder or co-founder of multiple companies)

Most deaths occur at speed. You can not program all variables into a car just like you cannot do it with anything really.

Of course? No research to support your claim.

I would say the same about you. There are equally good reasons to assume they will not be safer. No one knows how to build common sense into computers. However, commonsense reasoning is needed for an ADS to handle all the unexpected situations (edge cases) it might encounter. Without commonsense reasoning, ADSs can only handle edge cases that have been explicitly coded into the ADS software or edge cases that the ADS has been trained to handle. Accidents and traffic jams can occur when edge cases are encountered that were not anticipated by the ADS engineers. The reality is that ADSs will likely be safe for certain ODDs (e.g. a corporate shuttle that back and forth along a single street at 5 mph) but perhaps not for other ODDs (e.g. a taxi service that covers a broad geography and all weather conditions) and for Level 5 operation. https://thegradient.pub/are-self-driving-cars-really-safer-than-human-drivers/

Oz is a police state You cant buy takeaway beer after 9pm in most places. You cant buy basic medicines without seeing a doctor Pubs are full of pokies $30 for a <deleted> steak and salad Women are 80kgs on average