ozimoron

How does using smart bombs mean they didn't carpet bomb ? My point is that they were accurate and they still carpet bombed. They accurately carpet bombed. My point in the comment about accuracy was that it was deliberate bombing of civilians and therefore a war crime. Carpet bombing doesn't have to be indiscriminate, it just has to obliterate an area.

I don't know what Yaam is but somtam has lots of fiber and goodness including vit c. I don't eat it much because I try to avoid all that salt and it tastes bland without fish sauce.

The Flamer Has Posted Again.

I never claimed they didn't use bomb sights. I implied that the bomb sights were a whole lot better now. For a start it's all computer controlled. The pilot doesn't have his thumb on the red button anymore.

Actor John Schneider, best known for his role as Bo Duke on the classic TV show Dukes of Hazzard, responded to a post on X from President Joe Biden late Wednesday — and suggested that he be publicly executed. https://www.rawstory.com/john-schneider/

Did the wars between 1948 and October 7 not exist or did they end?

It should be common sense to anybody. Do you imagine that Israel fighter jets have any issues with dropping bombs on their intended targets, dumb or not?

Stop talking about me. Do you disagree with what I said in that post?

would you disagree? honestly? Is it not common dog?

Aircraft unchallenged by missiles, enemy fighters or flak don't have much trouble landing their bombs on the intended target. This isn't WW2

Again, I posted this link before but you seem oblivious to its existence by claiming I'm making it up. Now an intelligence report by the United States have revealed that more than half the bombs dropped were ‘dumb bombs’ or untargeted, not precise bombs. https://www.livemint.com/news/world/israel-s-use-of-untargeted-dumb-bombs-in-palestines-gaza-in-war-against-hamas-exposed-by-us-intelligence-report-11702561031142.html

If I cross the line it's rare and due to extreme provocation. I'm very careful to restrict my comments to the post and sometimes I might generalize about what I think of a certain group of like minded people which the poster may or may not identify with. If ypu look back critically and with an open mind you'll see that I'm attacking subject material overwhelmingly.

That's a whole lot better than making denials and accusations with no sources.

Less than half apparently. But that's irrelevant, they precisely targeted civilians.

Herein lies a problem. You seem unable to distinguish between criticism of the content and criticism of the author. Seek help with this, it will make you a better netizen. Not that you are the worst around here for that by any means.

I quoted experts who think they are war crimes. ergo, I think they are war crimes

not worth responding to this level of petulance. Netanyahu and others will see their day in The Hague. So will Hamas commanders.

I flame nobody. I frequently ridicule posts with sarcasm.

Well war crimes were engendered by this viewpoint.

I condemned Hamas. Another one trying to tell me what I think as an insult instead of addressing the topic itself.

He said Gaza belongs to Israel. Where does he get that idea from?

Point out the bit that disproves the definition I quoted. Your great at innuendo, short on explaining yourself.

My thrust is not that Netanyahu is the ONE to blame at all. That you deliberately and frankly stupidly want to project is your problem.

I just reposted a link above. Where do you get off?