Israeli war crimes are sufficiently widely enough alleged that I can safely claim it's not an extreme position. In fact the minority (by far) deny these are war crimes. As I suggested, try reading independent sources. Israel risks being a pariah nation for generations.
Never said they weren't my opinions.The real point here is that I am not robinson crusoe. Inability to acknowledge any significant failing on behalf of your team is highly questionable
Not in this situation. Every reasonable person on the planet acknowledges that most of the civilian deaths are far beyond what could be expected as unintentional collateral damage.
BS until you provide a credible link. This reaction by Hamas was entirely predictable. Anything else would be nuts until Israel agrees to a permanent solution.
And before the islamophobes jump on, for the 1,000th time, I condemn Hamas.
I think the world expects that both Gaza and the West Bank are Palestinian land. After all this denial you now suggest that Gaza is not Palestinian land or just not Hamas land? Nobody suggested that Hamas gets any land. Nobody. They are terrorists. The world expects that the PA is the legitimate government and they would have been by now had Netanyahu and the far right religious extremists not been running interference by supporting Hamas.
President Obama's Middle East speech yesterday lasted for about 45 minutes, but one solitary line has generated a disproportionate amount of coverage and controversy: "The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps."
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/05/what-obama-meant-1967-lines-why-irked-netanyahu/350925/