ozimoron

How did any "emergency powers" benefit the government who used them in any way?

What claim of fact did I make that I need to link to?

What I wrote was common sense, I have no bias. I have never been to the UK.

I believe it was you that implied or claimed that the effects of Brexit should have kicked in moments after the ink on the agreement was signed and not months after it was actually implemented?

Please link to evidence that this guy is a whistleblower in the usual sense of the word. i.e. an employee of the organisation and not some outsider making an allegation without any more evidence than possessed by you or me.

All scientific papers have conclusions which lay people can read.

The websites claim that over 360 grams per week is dangerous. I find it ridiculous to suggest that over 360 grams in a problem but under that is perfectly safe. Thanks for the heads up about plant proteins and amino acids.

The naysayers are suggesting it has nothing to do with Brexit. Nobody is saying it has everything to do with Brexit.

In what form and from where might the proof come? The FBI has been investigating H Biden for years now,

Dominion's calculation was that Fox would drag it out for years and their mates in the SC would change the law and allow Fox to get off the hook.

No way. Fox network made a profit of 4.8 billion last year. His lawyers and bean counters had to know that he was likely to be sued by Dominion. They wanted to make sure Newsmax wouldn't take their market share. It was a calculated risk for them. They would happily do it all again and will.

Nevertheless, Chernobyl and Fushima will be forever, repeat, forever, no go zones. To say no5hing of the risk to Zaphorista by the Russian army. And nuclear waste must be stored safely for hundreds of thousands of years. And nuclear power is by far the most expensive. Last time I checked, solar panels didn't explode very often.

At least six workers have exceeded lifetime legal limits for radiation and more than 175 (0.7%) have received significant radiation doses. Workers involved in mitigating the effects of the accident do face minimally higher risks for some cancers.[28] According to Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, the government awarded workers’ compensation to a man who developed leukemia while working on the Fukushima cleanup in 2015 and has acknowledged that three other Fukushima workers developed leukemia and thyroid cancer after working on the plant cleanup.[29] As of 2020, the total number of cancer and leukemia instances has risen to six cases according to the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO).[5] In 2018 one worker died from lung cancer as a result from radiation exposure wiki One person has been killed and four injured, one seriously, in a blast at the Marcoule nuclear site in France. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-14883521

I did hear of deaths from nuclear power plant accidents in Japan and Ukraine. Don't they count? There's also no go areas in my home state because of uranium mining. https://theconversation.com/the-story-of-rum-jungle-a-cold-war-era-uranium-mine-thats-spewed-acid-into-the-environment-for-decades-160871 Uranium is chemically toxic to the proximal tubules of the kidney, although the damage is reversible, at least in the early stages.8 Increased glucose levels in the urine and high blood pressure have been reported.9 One study concluded that “uranium exposure is weakly associated with altered proximal tubulus function without a clear threshold, which suggests that even low uranium concentrations in drinking water can cause nephrotoxic effects. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3653646/

UK inflation falls by less than expected as food prices soar by 19.1% https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/apr/19/uk-inflation-falls-consumer-prices-index according to Reuters, the UK is only EU country to still have double digit inflation.

Other than the warnings in every single govt and credible medical website that red meat over 360 grams a week causes cancer, no. I did see a YT'er claim that plant based protein lacks essential amino acids. There's conflicting info on which is better.

Not can't - won't

Whatever it was it had nothing to do with man made climate change which wasn't a thing then. If you were really interested you'd do some research but you're just intent on trolling.

Yes it is. It refers to scientific concepts constantly.

There is no current cooling. The natural cooling is being overwhelmed by the man made warming. Surely, that's obvious to you and you are just trolling?

Every time someone denied there's a problem I find they mostly tend to vote right wing and think that individual action is what it takes to affect climate change. It gets on my nerves.

All of it is caused by humans. We are otherwise in a cooling period. Natural archives generally show that Earth's average temperature roughly 6,000 years ago was warmer by about 0.7 °C (1.3 °F) compared with the 19th century median, and then cooled gradually until the Industrial Revolution. We found that most evidence points to this result. https://www.sciencealert.com/before-human-made-climate-change-was-earth-actually-in-a-cooling-phase

Then do so. I don't believe you can link to credible science to indicate that climate change is anything but a crisis.

Use linux and don't worry about it.

None is caused by natural climate cycles. We are in a natural cooling phase which has been masked by anthropomorphic global warming.