ozimoron

Sorry, it was Hawaiian. My mistake. Not sure why you're buying into an argument about not providing a link as required by the forum rules.

Many are. More would be but for the huge issues related with nuclear power. Massive amounts of water required for cooling, political and geological issues, requirement to protect waste storage for millennia.

Your claim that Obama's Hawaiian residence had erosion issues. Done many, many, many times. You're dodging providing the requested link to support your claim that Obama's residence is having erosion issues.

When was the last time you saw a left winger accuse someone of being "non woke"? I have never seen it. Uneducated ignorant maybe but not "non-woke".

No, I'm saying I want you to comply with the rules and provide a link. I know coastal erosion exists. I an skeptical that the erosion affecting that property is coastal erosion and challenging you to prove it, however, I see you are dodging it as usual.

A video showing that nothing is happening while omitting video showing him amidst violence isn't exculpatory evidence.

Link please.

If they did, where did they? Where is your link? Just more baseless right wing talking points with a much support as casper the ghost.

It just means the palace is indeed racist to the core. It is not an explicit statement in any usual sense of the phrase.

And if a permanent solution to climate change is effected and made law then the climate change agencies will see their funds reallocated. Nobody is pushing back against this despite the right wing talking points.

Given that most cities and arable land lie near the sea it's definitely a problem and that problem needs to be fixed before a tipping point arrives in the very near future. Scientists know there's only one viable solution to the problem and it isn't building sea walls.

His problem is that the member in question rarely (I'm being generous) provides links to back up his arguments.

Proof that republican illiteracy is a thing. Home schooling has a lot to answer for.

I guess to you that's proof that sea level rise isn't happening or isn't a problem? By the way, Obama's sea front property is about ten feet above sea level. Facts matter. That means it will about about three centuries at the current rates of sea level rise before it becomes a problem. Your gotcha moment is a furphy.

One of the most powerful people in Congress, the Chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, James Comer, had two separate subcommittees holding hearings on Wednesday. During Wednesday’s Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Energy Policy, and Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Rep. Cori Bush blasted one GOP witness who admitted to saying African, Latin American, Indian, and American Indian (his term) cultures “overall are inferior to Western culture.” Also on Wednesday, a witness who appeared before the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic had written a book that was considered so racist it was the subject of a 2014 article in The New Republic titled, “The Dangerous New Scientific Racism.” https://www.rawstory.com/oversight-republicans-just-held-two-hearings-with-witnesses-accused-of-racism-one-was-praised-by-david-duke/

You needn't be concerned that anyone was in any doubt about that.

A rare moment of agreement. Carlson is only trying to diminish his role in spreading Trump's lies.

True, fossil fuel companies are making record profits this year.

A Colorado judge has censured an attorney who represented former President Donald Trump for false claims over the 2020 elections. Jenna Ellis was Trump’s senior legal advisor in 2020, when the former president tried to overturn the results of the presidential election. Ellis as part of an agreement admitted to making “misrepresentations,” Colorado Newsline reports. https://www.rawstory.com/jenna-ellis-2659560660/

Yes it's been known for decades and the problem has been willfully ignored by the right for just as long. Ignorance funded by fossil fuel pseudoscience. If you can't see it and touch it, it doesn't exist, right? Sea level rise is measured in mm per year but still has a dramatic effect.

Stunning in all 3 photos.

1. Carlson won a civil jury trial based on his own claim that his shows are so whack job crazy that no reasonable person would take him seriously. The jury accepted that testimony. 2. His own CEO admitted that his hosts were lying about the election and Jan 6. 3. Where's the link Im asked for that the committee cherry picked the footage? Even a link to a credible claim to that effect would be fine. Again it seems that you can't step up to the plate when challenged.

Link to evidence that they did as required by the rules here? I'll wait, if I can hold my breath forever that is.

He went on to accuse Tucker Carlson of picking and choosing the bits and pieces of the surveillance footage to craft a fake narrative. Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) compared it to footage of the World Trade Center on 9/11 before the towers were hit by the planes and claimed that Sept. 11 was "mostly peaceful in New York." https://www.rawstory.com/january-6-dominion-lawsuit

Failure to provide all the footage to all the news outlets makes it impossible to fact check the cherry picking.