Liverpool Lou

That is different from just opening a bank account which is what I was commenting on. Bank accounts do not need to be "funded" to facilitate opening, a nominal deposit is acceptable initially.

Yes, it can be, it is no longer as easy as it used to be.

No. he does not; using an agent to open a legitimate bank account does not jeopardise the account.

Using an agent to open a bank account is not illegal!

Because anonymity is their privilege.

Never come to pass.

"...great food...". Nothing about Dutch food is great.

I can see. Lonely, That's not a logical conclusion but, then, who's surprised at that?

Poor lad. I'm not sure if someone can help you. Don't worry, I'm not in need of anyone's help.

No. Anyone with a basic understanding of the English language can read it.

Don't be silly I'm not, you appear to have the franchise on that.

You don't read news? You don't watch news? You don't have internet? Where are you living? In Transnistria or Timbuktu? Don't send me such stupid replies. You're a joke. The joke is you; yes, I do read the news that's how I know as a fact that no one, anywhere, has credibly asserted that there was a third person in that plane's cockpit likely to have contributed, or not, to the accident, if there has been such a claim you'd have quoted it.

The "standards" that Trump adhere to are perfectly reasonable whilst he is representing the US. That some people despise him does not make his standards unacceptable.

That was not the conclusive outcome of that accident and it crashed into a river, not into the ground. The final statement from the NTSC was that they were unable to determine the cause of the crash and was thus inconclusive.

Pointing out factual inaccuracies and lies is not "nit-picking".

That's what I said. Thanks for repeating 👍 No, that's not what you posted.

Who said that and where was it reported?

You should ask them, not me, as I have no idea how the BiB operates in BKK.......🤗 My questions were rhetorical, apart from occasional very limited walks through certain areas as a performance they do not exist.

Police officers are not banned from the private company, i.e. not a state enterprise, the BTS.

Why not, if he is an officer on foot patrol, going from one area to another easily...? 🤔 1. Are there any "foot-patrol officers" pounding the beat in Bangkok? 2. If those "foot-patrol officers" did start to use the BTS (they, very obviously, do not) they would not be "foot-patrol officers". 3. Why would "foot-patrol officers" have areas so expansive that they needed the use of the BTS that they cannot access?

The standards of disgraceful and highly undiplomatic behavior have been reduced by having some hateful, vindictive, lowlife clowns on this forum...not referring to you, of course.

What was the relevance of your claiming to be "a vet" in that post?

None of that was "disgraceful" behaviour .

As the authorities officially invited him and there was no "disgraceful behaviour" on his part last time, that's not even remotely likely.

Perhaps you missed the bit about them being on duty and in uniform? No, I didn't. Why would an on-duty RTP police officer be using the BTS? Don't be ridiculous.