Give it up, a simple internet search gives you all the answers.
If confirmation was available it would have been posted by now. Why should I have to go searching the internet for information that does not exist when a simple corroborating answer to my question would have sufficed? And who are you to tell me to "give it up"?
Instead of asking for links (at later claim they are bias) you could actually follow the news. Read The Economist for instance. You might learn something.
As could you!
The reason that I asked him was that I do read the news and his post was not factual.
"Instead of asking for links (at later claim they are bias) you could..."
Instead of lamely attempting to rebuke me for asking for sources of, clearly, false information, you could have posted your Economist's confirmation of his figures...if there was any. Obviously there are not.
"The victim believed that the two foreigners were French nationals due to their accents while speaking English, although he was not entirely certain of this assumption".
"The victim believed that the two foreigners were French nationals due to their accents while speaking English, although he was not entirely certain of this assumption".
"Officers at Mueang Pattaya Police Station reported that they successfully identified Nam and her boyfriend. The man was a member of a rescue team in Nonthaburi province near Bangkok, not the police officer as his vest suggested. Officers are continuing their investigation to bring the two suspects to justice".
My wife would describe what she did,
as using her Magical powers with a Political elite.
"My wife would describe what she did..."
Huh? What who did? Your wife?
Cobblers. Smoking may well be illegal but no one has ever been imprisoned for doing so on the beach, nor had "huge fines" imposed. Maximum penalties are there purely as a deterrent.