Liverpool Lou

Looks like you mixed-up "confused" with "consumed" for starters For starters, whatever you think I my condition is, I find it much more interesting that Tidal Wave has not returned with any specifics, at all, to back up his false assertion that I am confused about Surachate's legal position. So, in addition to your "starter" (which suggests that you have more), perhaps you'd like assist that poster with some specifics that do demonstrate my alleged confusion about Surachate?

You seem consumed by this story for some reason .. Fortunately I'm not Perhaps you could indicate what you think that I'm confused about rather than being so non-specific? I'm not at all confused about his situation.

Soon the clues will all line up and even you can then decipher them . And until the "clues" become proven facts, not speculation, he will remain not guilty. Are you suggesting that you are privy to all the evidence, clues, as you refer to it? That's odd after trying to call me a know-it-all!

Not legally, he couldn't, if the sole purpose of the company was to circumvent Thai land ownership laws,

So your in the know then, or just know it all. Not at all, didn't say that I was, or that I do! I do know, though, that he has not been found guilty of any corruption yet, never mind being "incredibly corrupt". If you know otherwise, empirically, then post it.

Le pissoir!

There is no Interpol notice for Surachate, there is not even an arrest warrant.

"...nobody knows,,," And that includes you, you know nothing about it, factually, yet you continue to assert that he "is incredibly corrupt".

Of course he was never arrested, that's because on each occasion the police had agreed, with his lawyer, to deferring the meeting, there was no arrest warrant issued until after he'd gone to Singapore.

Exactly, "Dan" is just regurgitating hearsay from an estate agent in Pattaya.

Such profundity.

As is the difference between an apparently innocent Austrian and a guilty Austrian for most AN posters a difficult one for them to identify.

You're stating that he's a Bitcoin scammer, can you back up that accusation?

Not if the plates were changed legally as he claims.

https://www.facebook.com/helmut.obritzberger.1/videos/7185426381554671 Seems that he may not be as guilty as some here would like him to be.

Yes.

No.

Why would I be concerned about others problems in this regard? Exactly, why are you concerned about other members posts that do not affect you in any way?

Hear, hear!

Still stalking. You need help. Clearly, it's not him that needs help.

That is not accurate. Any debts incurred by her, or businesses failing that are in her sole name, with him receiving no resultant benefit, do not become his problem legally.

I do have nothing to worry about.

I said ' and if ' I did not make a statement purported as a fact! get your facts right lou! I did get my facts right, you suggested that I was a bad as the ones you're accusing of attacking you, that is a fact.

Where did I say that I supported it? Your accusing me of that is just as libellous as those you're accusing of being "slanderous" [sic]!

Why? Jesus, no... you can't be suggesting that... surely not... seriously?