Liverpool Lou

.... "Thai victims shared the conflict on social media inciting nearly 2,000 Thai transwomen to gather and attack the Filipina ladyboys." ... (source) "...inciting nearly 2,000 Thai transwomen to gather and attack the Filipina ladyboys." What's the point of your requoting that? I can read but, clearly, there were not 2,000 trannies involved in that attack, as that "source" is implying.

Such nonsense...2,000 trannies?

A starting point: https://www.dylon.co.uk/meta/international-partners.html Thailand Vorabhas D. Co. Ltd 82/174 Moo 11, Soi Ekachai 10, Ekachai Road, Bangkhunthian, Chomthong Bangkok 10150 00 66 2 893 8893 peerayosa (AT) vorabhasd.co.th www.vorabhasd.co.th

I doubt you even know the meaning of word substantiated Nothing rational to come up with so you contravene the forum rules and lob in a lame attempt at an insult instead. Bravo!

So in other words more utter drivel out of same expert No drivel from me, only substantiated fact demonstrated in the video but you are doing exceptionally well in the utter drivel arena.

oh do share your expertise on the matter, PLEASE Certainly. Theft committed at night carries a more severe penalty, look it up yourself, Section 334/335 of the Thai Criminal Code.

feel free to show off yet another one of your expertise, be a darling and translate what he is blabbing on about Use your expertise and read his specific and detailed notes, written in English, that he shows to the camera.

Perhaps you could indicate what you think that I'm confused about rather than being so non-specific? I'm not at all confused about his situation. For starters, whatever you think I my condition is, I find it much more interesting that Tidal Wave has not returned with any specifics, at all, to back up his false assertion that I am confused about Surachate's legal position. So, in addition to your "starter" (which suggests that you have more), perhaps you'd like assist that poster with some specifics that do demonstrate my alleged confusion about Surachate? Here I've pasted the part of the thread where you appear to "start making things up" and suggesting all sorts of nonsense try reading it 🤔 No, I have not made up anything that is in those comments of mine. Instead of suggesting that those comments are "made up" and "nonsense" perhaps you could tell me specifically what you see as "made up nonsense"?

So that's the highlight of your life then. Correcting people No, it is not, but your lack of ability was an accurate observation that I made of you.

How is that any of your 'kin business?

At least I can express myself, 100% accurately, in written English which is an ability that would help you.

Gawd...

Is your understanding of English really that bad? Nothing directly causes cancer in all cases. Certain things increase the risk of cancer. Learn to think. No, I have a perfect understanding of English; you stated that "mouthwash causes cancer", it doesn't, as you have now admitted in that comment..."Nothing directly causes cancer..."

Looking forward to it. Wear your tu tu so that I'll know it's you.

Obviously, why do you ask?

Yes, that's what I said was reported, mouthwash on its own does not cause cancer, as you falsely claimed.

Your words... "I don't abuse anyone. That's what you do. Keyboard warrior". You don't understand the meaning of the word "irony", do you!?

So why do you do it so much?

Pike wasn't that daft!

Lumpini Park, midday tomorrow, entrance opposite the old Dusit Thani.

"Massive steaming pile of poppycock!" He was right. You really should read your own links before you post them, that way you don't debunk your own daft claims. It was not reported that "mouthwash causes cancer". This is what was actually reported... "According to a recent study published in the journal Oral Oncology, using mouthwash more than three times a day, paired with poor oral health and irregular dental visits, may lead to an increased incidence of oral cancer".

Lets have a fight then. Winner gets 100,000 baht. Sure, where would you like to fight, in the playground or behind the bike sheds? You do know that this is a forum, don't you, and you're already getting your arse kicked here?

So unlikely.

Don't forget to use mouthwash before you venture out......😘 I doubt that there are any strong enough.

No, it's not. It's the best advice I was ever given, speaking as a divorced from a "Thai that wanted me to buy her a house" man. Yes, it was... "...dishonest, ill-informed, scaremongering "warning" that has no credibility in general". You're conveniently ignoring that I used the phrase "in general" whilst your personal example was one specific. In general, your warning was dishonest, ill-informed, scaremongering and that had no credibility and I'm speaking as being twice-divorced from Thai women, neither of whom wanted me to buy them houses as part of the nuptial arrangements.