Liverpool Lou

If he rents, he's not encroaching...unless he built the steps.

What's the "scam"?

...or, more likely, he's simply a wealthy Swiss, not a money-launderer.

Who said that his income or assets come from the sanctuary?

Perhaps they feel as though they should be lowering themselves to your level out of politeness?

Thanks. You continued kindness and supported is noted. A real cheerleader of this forum, ain't we? You're welcome, always happy to point out blatant hypocrisy...even though the offenders don't approve.

Why? What have they done to deserve that?

What "discrimination"? The disabled are not banned or charged extra. Very reasonably, they just have to be able to take care of themselves or be accompanied by someone who can.

Pretty amazing in this day and age. It's also b0llocks, the airline has never stated that.

Incredulous...... Someone, somewhere, needs a knock on the head. Yes, Srikcir does need that knock as he made up all that cobblers.

Ironically, that reads like it was written by a very petty, very incomplete, very poorly developed and juvenile individual that smells of something but not adults.

A very risky circumstance...those loosing [their]face could very easily find that they lose [that] face.

She could mind her own business.

The implication in the report is that the results of the Blood Alcohol test 'may' include disciplinary actions such as confinement to barracks or duty suspension... Hardly a hardcore prosecution of a drunk driver who's involved in a multiple collision... Those are internal penalties for a Police officer that may be in addition to any motoring/drink driving offences that the article clearly explained are being investigated. obviously, also.

Not educated enough to spell words out? If you post all of your comments in Latin, I'll spell out my responses, professor.

Seeing how you had to edit to include bigoted racist in your comments I’ll give you my rebuttal. Nothing racist about my comment. It’s a fact, they stink. A hygiene issue. Q.E.D.

Where was it reported that he would not be prosecuted?

One day would be within fifteen days.

A bit nit-pickey LL and overly defensive of a system everyone knows is broken. ...but a 100% factual comment on his 100% speculative assertion. And I wasn't defending the system, I was pointing out that the complainant could never know what action was taken (unless he was the recipient of the rewards that are occasionally offered), for all he knows, every complaint he made (bet there wasn't more than one, though) may have resulted in action against the driver.

Most Thai taxi drivers don't have a vehicle to be confiscated, they belong to co-operatives and are rented on a daily basis.

Why get into a taxi with a driver who has already demonstrated, 100%, that he is dishonest?

"Nothing ever came about my reporting the drivers". How could you know that?

Why would an employee of a foreign company outside Thailand, not working or earning income in Thailand need a Thai work permit and work-appropriate visa?

Posting it is an offence here, too, that's why he has been arrested.

What an EVIL woman.... "...girl became the unintended recipient..." What is "EVIL" about the inadvertent receipt of the photos (so, presumably, the unintended sending to the girl) if that is actually the case? A very stupid error, sure, but "EVIL"?