Liverpool Lou

But it's just speculation 😊 They haven't observed anything. Gawd... I said "if".

...well, that's your assumption.

Gawd...

Not if it is an objective, accurate, reasonable observation!

You're assuming that I do that!

Another assumption by someone who actually thinks they know more than just a few expats and what they actually do here. No, I did not assume anything, I speculated based on what I have seen here. Ironically, your assumption that I think that I know more is just an assumption, something that you are hypocritically accusing me of doing! Once again, one AN-poster rule for some posters as long as it is not applied to themselves!

So your opinion is fact and my opinion is just opinion? That's some daft logic!

Just your opinion.

Very many of them are there voluntarily not forcibly and it is just your opinion that it is abhorrent.

They don't, really?... "A Thai man, 74 year old Champ Manatae, revealed to the media that his home and restaurant were near the beach. He stated that the dogs had bitten both Thai and foreign people. Another Thai national, 51 year old Sunan Chartchai, disclosed that locals and foreigners in the area previously participated in a beach-cleaning activity a few years ago. However, they no longer dared to engage in any beach activities due to the presence of the dogs. Business operators who run accommodation and restaurants along the beach also voiced their concerns, fearing that they might soon lose customers if the dogs continued to wander freely and bite people.

Me too, but that action would be illegal.

Of course, they could, but they wouldn't be "pushing through" the value of the AIA policy, they'd probably be doing it just on the basis of your not having funds in your bank.

Hear, hear. And...most, if not all of them, are massive hypocrites because, if they are living here long term, the chances are that they have experienced short times by choice!

If we're referring to the same case, that person got a theoretical 200+ years because there were 50 offences that he was charged with; even if it was humanly possible he wouldn't have to serve 200+years. That type of penalty is not peculiar to Thailand, it is normal in most, if not all legal systems...commit multiple offences, get multiple charges and multiple sentences.

If you want to be like that , there are more than three errors in your own comment! 1. "1 euro is a money"...what? One euro is one euro. 2. The euro is a currency, not "a money" 3. Switzerland is a European country, geographically.

What do you call a victim? I used to get a kick in the backside when I was young did I sue anybody? 1. The victim is the woman who was attacked. 2. The woman is not suing Fehr, he is being prosecuted by the Thai authorities. 3. You could have sued for the abuse if you had wanted to.

No, the victim did.

No, it does not.

Hear, hear!

A Machiavellian response? Huh? Why would you be demanding that? I'd be looking for a draconian punishment.

It's been going on for twenty-two weeks already, if that settlement was happening it would have happened by now.

Who said that was ok?

what ? incoherent bs Nothing incoherent about that comment.

Doesn't he have to appear in court and be proven guilty before you are able to announce the sentence?

You were right...of course.