Liverpool Lou

Only one of them was. The Bolt driver seemed to be rational and restrained in the circumstances.

Let's not go into percentages.....😉 Why not? 99.9% of the time you're right!

Forgot this already? What was Trump convicted of? Details on the 34 counts and his guilty verdict - CBS News What was his sentence if he was convicted? Forget that already?

I hate to disagree with you but, the thing is, that lame old hackneyed cliché isn't factually correct.

Trump has been convicted of crimes?

He supports Putin?

What should be embarrassing is not knowing the difference between the outcome of a civil case and a conviction. Trump was not convicted of sexual assault. The only opinion that mattered was the opinion of the jury in the civil suit, not the obscene words of the a.rsehole judge commenting after the actual verdict, the verdict that stood.

which part of my post do you feel does not originate from the engilsh language ? It's not the origin of the post, it's the composition of it that made it unintelligible... "Always make me smile when pull the pants on one and they black and straight !" "...pull the pants on one..."? "...they black and straight... !"?

Not a "would be" upskirter, an actual one.

In reality, most of them are probably not boinking anything except their palms.

Thought this was an English language forum?

Well done....whoever got the joke. They're so slow.

Makes a lot of sense.

...that will not apply to most people but may protect two distinct vulnerable groups.

For some reason he does not want to deport that South African multi-billionaire who owns X. Neither does he want to deport "ALL immigrants"

B0llocks. Only ILLEGAL immigrants was what he was referring to!

What makes you think that those Starbucks items "are there for days in a row" and that the shelves are not frequently restocked with fresh items? Why should goods in a refrigerated display for a few hours show any "signs of decay"?

"You cannot control what others think or believe". Yet you seem to think that you should be able to!

Yes, I sure can have an opinion on your comment (or anyone else's for that matter). Simple as that! I changed nothing in your comment that I quoted, you posted those words.

To angrily assert that men who find ladyboys attractive need to be labelled as gay? Like, they obsessively need that label to be applied to someone else and if they don't it's as if they are caused some form of distress? That "makes sense" to you? Yes, absolutely it does, except that I didn't use the phrases " angrily assert", "obsessively need" and "form of distress"...those were your words. You seem to be suggesting that I cannot have that opinion, that sure doesn't make sense to me.

And he appeared to stand up and walk after being thrown over the barrier.

No idea what you mean. Doesn't surprise me.

Makes sense to most normal people.

What are you saying? I suggest you avoid Phuket. I'm saying what I posted. I suggest that you read it and the OP.

You don't know the difference between booked ride-hailing services and taxis?