Liverpool Lou

His next what?

What I can see in the photo is him running to cross the road, into the path of the oncoming vehicle, whilst looking backwards to his left. Who reported otherwise please? What you can see is a still from CCTV of someone moving or altering their direction in what appears to be a sudden manner, perhaps. You cannot know that he is "running to cross" the road, that is an assumption. "Who reported otherwise please?" Bangkok Post when reporting his death.

It was reported that he tried to jump out of the way of the oncoming car which could account for your thinking that he was not on the crossing. Crossing the road there he had to be on the crossing as it is a continuation of the full width of the gap in the median.

For the unsympathetic here... https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/89554483_1741901576506428_r.png

Why are you so concerned about my posting on this thread, what do you see that you would like to be contradicted? Is there something wrong with fallacies and inaccuracies being commented on? In the context of the OP, and the posts here, would you like to know that she was apparently on an "ATV", not a "moped"?

In the reported accident the CCTV capture appears to show that the traffic was coming from his left.

Sometimes, some of them don't stop but normally they do.

Best you contact The Thaiger and get them to retract this: 5. It is against the law in Thailand to “go commando.” It is actually illegal to go in public without underwear in the Kingdom. It’s the law. If you do, you could (theoretically) wind up in jail. https://thethaiger.com/news/national/top-10-laws-to-beware-of-in-thailand I have no need to contact The Thaiger, my response was to your repeated comments that it is an offence. Perhaps you should contact The Thaiger.

Ok, know-it-all...diplomatic vehicle plates, as shown in the provided link.

No real need, this has been confirmed many times before. No, it has not been confirmed as true, ever. Just because AN members keep posting it doesn't make it factual.

You emphasise it even though there is no such law making non-wearing of underwear illegal.

What if he was?

Can you point to the specific section of Thai law that prohibits an individual from leaving the house without wearing any underwear? He can't.

Garbage.

Yet no one's ever been able to quote the relevant underwear law. Wonder why?

Obviously, that did not happen.

Oooooo....

"EU countries (except Ireland, Iceland, Norway, Lichtenstein and Switzerland)..." I know my facts; Iceland, Norway, Lichtenstein and Switzerland are not EU countries! I'm surprised that you did not know that.

Forums are for people to share they opinion as well as facts whether you like it or not no justification required You phrased your comment as a statement, not an opinion. You stated that they are conspirators to manslaughter... "Definitly a little off they being co conspirators to manslaughter", that's not how anyone expresses an opinion. I didn't ask you to justify your comment, I only asked where it had been reported.

Everyone is released after serving their time, even stout people, and, in view of his age and health, it is doubtful that he had any input into the building's contract that was commissioned by the State Audit Office, not ITD.

He served his sentence, paid his fines and was released a long time ago.

I have a feeling the company will just declare bankruptcy and walk away..... I have a feeling that ITD will claim off their contractors insurance policy.

Speculative, irrational cobblers.

You wouldn't have an audience if you were using that facility. What's there to worry about if women are looking in a mirror?

Who cannot read? Women cannot be viewed in the toilets, no one can be but those outside can be seen from inside that mens toilet.