Liverpool Lou

Never. How may times have you seen that? What are you doing standing so close that you can read what's on the piece of paper or phone of the person ahead of you, anyway?

Usually replacement cards are issued from any branch. That's the case with Bangkok Bank, Krungsri and Kasikorn for sure.

Nowhere does it state that she came to his hotel room in the early hours of the morning or that he was trying to get her a job in the early hours of the morning. It does state that she was allegedly sexually harassed in the hotel in the early hours of the morning.

"There are genuine reasons why an adult might take a minor to hotel..." As there may well be in this case.

The guy is going down, it wouldn’t be a story unless there wasn’t any video evidence and/or witness accounts of her being there. Inviting a minor into a hotel room, it’s enough for me. No one denied that she was there. He didn't "invite a minor into a hotel room", the girl was with him with knowledge of her mother because he was allegedly trying to get her a job. That his not being found guilty of anything, yet, "is enough for you" says a lot about you. What if it turns out that he's innocent (as he is right now!)?

Sounds like you go to church every Sunday. "Sounds like" you're not very rational.

Yes understood....but is the mothers story/motives in this true....we don,t know for sure. It's not known that they are not true, either.

Where has there been a lack of evidence reported in this case that allegedly happened only a few hours ago?

It's the way they roll on Asean Now!

He is the mother's boyfriend!

Has he been found guilty?

No one is defending his action if the allegation is true but that has not been shown to be the case, yet. The well-reported case of the exonerated van driver accused of rape by a lying girl and her family should be borne in mind.

If he's a boyfriend already, presumably they had sex before, so what's now? the whole story doesn't make sense... He's the mother's boyfriend, not the girl's!

A delusional statement, possibly due to the belief of believing that it’s okay to hit on adolescents. A delusional statement, possibly due to "the belief of believing" [sic] that it’s okay to assume guilt without a conclusion to the case.

If it turns out that he is guilty, you mean?

There are opinions, and there are facts. A Kia Stinger turbo has about 30% more turbo boost pressure than the comparative Mercedes 200 SLK. So what? Higher boost in that model doesn't make Kia "technologically superior" to Mercedes.

Everybody needs access to an affordable cup of coffee in all coffee shops, its a basic human right. B0llocks. As you well know.

And you'd be right but, so what? Malaysians pay for the benefit of their susidised fuel!

I didn't read the article If you didn't read the article how did you know that she was in Selangor?...

No, she was supposed to simply buy the non-subsidised 97 that is available from the pumps!

"It's quite possible she was Malaysian using a car bought in Thailand therefore she had every right to use the 95 octane fuel". Highly unlikely. "Or if she was Thai and on holiday she will need to fuel a number of times, and it's possible that the car has problems with 95 grade fuel, so it means no use of the car or destroy the engine". So why would she have been filling up with subsidised 95 if it would destroy her engine when the non-engine destroying 97 was available?

Obviously, you didn't read it. She bought subsidised fuel that is only available for Malaysians.

Could it be that you didn't read the OP?

Ridiculous. She was filling up with fuel that she was not entitled to buy.

No, she's supposed to fill up with the 97, not the subsidised 95 that foreigners aren't permitted to buy, apparently... "Foreign license plate vehicles can refuel at gas stations in Malaysia, but only with benzene 97, not benzene 95, which is subsidized by the Malaysian taxpayer". "The Malaysian 'netizen' is a fool". Seems that he's not the fool!