I'd assume that your ex-spouse would have to file a claim in the country where the assets are, not in Thailand, and where they are covered by the pre-nup.
There is no suggestion from the government that the B300 is for "health or accident cover" for tourists. It is obviously intended to offset some of the governments cost of those who do not pay, it is not an insurance policy.
Surely you don’t think his actions are not worthy of condemnation ??
Of course, not, and I didn't say that, I said "continued condemnation", i.e. condemnation ad nauseum.
That's right, I agree, that's how the law works...commit offences, go to court, be found guilty, get fines for those offences, but the fines are not arbitrary, they are set out in the statutes.
You can't read? It has been confirmed that he was not drunk as per traffic laws. Where has it been confirmed that he was specifically intoxicated "on meth"?
He has been booked but now you want the laws that specify the fines applicable ignored just for his case? Or are you suggesting that there should be no limit on the size of fines for everyone and every offence?