Wobblybob

1 minute ago, Hummin said:

If Trump was in place, he would settled everything with a stroke of a pen on the map granting Putin Crimea and Donbas

🎶 If Trump ruled the world everyday would be the first day of spring 🎶. 🥴😂😂😂

Another gem Hummin, keep em cummin.

10 minutes ago, Gweiloman said:

 

It’s been over 2 years since the SMO started. Since then, the Ruble has become rubble (Biden), the Russian economy is in tatters and they are dropping washing machines into Ukraine (Von der crazy), the Russian soldiers are fighting with shovels (BBC) as 50% of their military has been destroyed without the loss of a single American soldier’s life (Lindsey Graham) (although their army is 15% stronger (Cavoli)). And yet, Ukraine has less territory than prior to the conflict.

 

So when is your beloved Ukraine going to take off their kid’s gloves and start asserting their might on the battlefield? The first counter offensive was a total success, recapturing about 2 sq km of land. I’m sure the next counter offensive will be able to recapture 4 sq km at the very least.

 

When are you guys going to wake up to the reality that Ukraine has lost and was always going to lose? If the west had stopped sending weapons 2 years ago like I said they should, there would be an Ukraine today with many men and women of child bearing age to regrow the country. Sadly, this seems no longer possible. But that’s alright. It’s a good investment for America (Graham and Cameron).

 

Poor Ukraine.

Ukraine will decide when it's time to stop fighting and not the Putin Pom Pom cheerleaders!

35 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Given that Ukraine is not a NATO country, or have a treaty with NATO or America, the west does not have to start MAD because Russia retaliated  against Ukraine using west supplied weapons to attack the Russian mainland.

If they do choose to escalate by using nukes, better say goodbye to every person you love before they become dust.

Let's be clear the West did not start this, Russia did!

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It’s a fair point.

 

After all St George’s day is celebrated in a whole lot of other counties 

Including: 

Albania, Bulgaria, Greece, Georgia, Kosovo, Lebanon, Syria, Palestine, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Catalonia, Aragon, Brazil.

 

I wonder if the citizens of these countries residing in London would have been welcomed at this particular ‘Rally’.

 

 

I wonder if the citizens of these countries residing in London would have been welcomed at this particular ‘Rally’.

The only people that wouldn't be welcome would be people carrying Swastika insignia, Hezbollah flags, Isis flags and wearing Yasser Arafat scarves thinking that they look like Laurence of Arabia. But these people are free to scream their hatred towards the Jews and in the most get away with it.

Two tiered policing at its finest!

9 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Except these were a bunch of right-wing, nationalistic thugs.

What a load of nonsensical Hyperbole. 

It seems as soon as a white person holds up a flag of the their country the are automatically classed as racist thugs, but carry Swastikas and that can be ok, it depends on the "context"

There aren't any horses present when these antisemitic marches are taking place, the police under Rowley and Khan are so transparent when it comes to policing, it is there for all to witness, those that want to witness it anyway! 

1 minute ago, G_Money said:

And you spend the vast majority of your time on American topics.

 

Doesn't your own country need your advice?

Does his own country want his advice, I very much doubt it. 

Just now, Denim said:

One man's hate is another's moral highground. 

Are you saying retarius has morals. 😂😂😂

12 hours ago, retarius said:

I guess, hate is very attractive to some people.

It seems to come easy to you! 😕

12 minutes ago, johng said:

Of course they have no say in who joins NATO as they are not members

they can express disapproval of continuing NATO expansion toward their border.

They can disapprove as much as they like, it makes no difference. Finland and Sweden had no intention of joining NATO until Russia illegally invaded Ukraine.

16 minutes ago, johng said:

NATO was formed after an attack by Germany not Russia.

NATO was formed to prevent the Russians from attacking peaceful countries, something that Russia could not pride itself with! 

Just now, johng said:

Continued east ward expansion of NATO, they have clearly said that NATO on the immediate Russian border is a red line...remember the Cuban missile crisis ?

Russia has no say in who joins NATO, it has nothing to do with Russia who joins NATO, for without Russia there would be no NATO! 

2 minutes ago, johng said:

Because they where provoked...by the equally autocratic "terrorist" US/Euro/NATO

No they wasn't provoked, explain your assertions!

1 minute ago, johng said:

If NATO/Euro/US  keeps up the provocation they may use them and thus WWIII ?

Russia invaded Ukraine, they are the aggressors, they are the ones provoking this war, why do you feel it necessary to defend a autocratic terrorist country like Russia?

4 minutes ago, Hummin said:

You making a fool of your self, continue the same over and over again and again. And you still do not understand. Cant help people from themselves. 

 

Have a good life

Insulting other posters is the best you have got when you have lost the debate, I cannot even remember you being correct on any debate, when you support terrorists you are on a hiding to nothing.🥴