.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
- Popular Post
Wobblybob
-
Posts
2,406 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Wobblybob
-
-
- Popular Post
Just now, RuamRudy said:You state that you don't do cheap point scoring yet you refuse to put his words in the context of which they were said, and you insist that your interpretation is the correct one? Ok...
Is it the same context as carrying a Swastika used by the Met Police is not offensive, would you like to explain perhaps your context of how calling white people out for being in a white!
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
- Popular Post
13 minutes ago, sirineou said:Cuba was a sovereign nation, was it not?
Whataboutery, disingenuous post!
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, RuamRudy said:If taken in isolation rather than in the context of the full speech then you could be forgiven for making such an incorrect assumption.
If cheap, tawdry point scoring is your intention, however, I don't think you should be forgiven for selective quoting.
Humza Yousaf's speech in context after Elon Musk 'racist' allegations
I don't do cheap tawdry point scoring nor am I oblivious to racist comments made by Scotlands FM. We at the moment live in a predominantly white country and Yousaf seems that there are still white positions being held by white citizens and he's not happy with that.
But luckily the SNP will soon be a spent force and so is Yousaf, no place in politics for racist ministers!
-
5
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
- Popular Post
Just now, sirineou said:and Ukraine was receiving weapon systems, NATO training and conducting joint exercises because?
And, they are a sovereign nation, they don't need Russian permission for anything.
Why are you so pro the aggressor here?
-
1
-
1
-
3
-
- Popular Post
9 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:What is contentious about this?
Do you think that Humza Yousafs "white" speech was racist in any way?
-
2
-
1
-
2
-
2
-
1 minute ago, sirineou said:
If what Merkel, Sarkozy, Burns. and many others said
"Ukraine induction into NATO, de facto declaration of war" is true.
What do you think a country against whom war was declared does?
I have no interest in what Merkel said and if I did I cannot read your supplied link as it is behind a paywall, which is against AN rules!
Ukraine was never going to be allowed into NATO until Putin illegally invaded their sovereign country and now there is a distinct possibility.
-
2
-
-
6 minutes ago, sirineou said:
For the last time,
None on the people I quoted are Russians. Anyway,
Good talking to you
Which still doesn't answer why you stated, "in defence of NATO expansion" if NATO is expanding it is all down to Putin!
-
1
-
-
14 minutes ago, simple1 said:
It becomes offensive when one is accused of supporting antisemitic/s in an attempt to crush debate. The appointee has an outstanding professional record and is within her rights to critique certain Israeli policies and actions. Below is a speech she gave at the National Press Club of Australia which will give further insight into her POV. Of course I expect yo and others with the same worldview not to bother to educate yourselves.
You accuse others of which you are guilty, is it not pompous and an insult to say "not to bother to educate yourselves" hypocrisy at its finest, for where I'm sitting you are reading and watching anyone that is a critique of Israel. We have shown you enough links to facilitate our claims, you have shown a Sky Anchorman introducing this anti-Semitic person, need to do better!
-
4 minutes ago, sirineou said:
Last time I checked Merkel was German . Sarkozy who had the same opinion was French. Burns who is now CIA director and was then ambassador to Russia , warned the US of the same is American.
You might want to research the issue a bit more before express an uninformed opinion.
I have done my research thanks very much, you my want to stop reading TASS and propagating Kremlin propaganda, you claimed that NATO was "in defence of NATO expansion. Russian land grabbing does not equate to NATO expansion!
-
2
-
-
3 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:
Germany & France Condemn UN’s Francesca Albanese for ‘Disgraceful’ Antisemitism
https://unwatch.org/germany-france-condemn-uns-francesca-albanese-for-disgraceful-antisemitism/
Oops, sorry Brian I have just uploaded the same link.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, simple1 said:
Many critics of Israeli policy are often critiqued, no surprise Sky News joined in. Her qualifications are outstanding, profile below:
There has been international attention and controversy surrounding Albanese's appointment and tenure as Special Rapporteur. Critics of Albanese have accused her of antisemitism and anti-Israel bias. Human rights groups have said the accusations are illegitimate attempts to discredit her criticism of Israel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francesca_Albanese
Why am I not surprised that you defend antisemitics, it is becoming a recurring theme with you and when confronted by your biases you go into denial mode!
If you ignore the Hamas massacre that started the war, the 14,000 rockets fired against Israeli towns, 130 hostages now being tortured in Gaza, how can you possibly understand the war?
And though you say it’s not in your mandate, you have commented. On February 10, you mocked the statement of President Macron that October 7th constituted the greatest antisemitic massacre of our century. You said the victims were “not killed because of their Judaism,” but rather “in reaction to Israel’s oppression.”
https://unwatch.org/germany-france-condemn-uns-francesca-albanese-for-disgraceful-antisemitism/
-
1
-
-
44 minutes ago, Neeranam said:
It's just a shame that all your posts consists of people with extremely antisemitic views, is this because it is difficult to slander the Israelis when being truthful? Nice try but no cigar!
Mr Neuer says the reason the United Nations “picked her” was because she is “extremely biased.”
He says she is someone who “pretends to be neutral.”
“Neither her position nor her background has anything to do with impartiality,” he said. “In fact, her mandate from 1993 is to investigate only ‘Israel’s violations.’ So her mandate is only to investigate Israel.”
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
5 minutes ago, sirineou said:I am paroting Nothing simply stating facts that are part of the public record.Not my fault if you don't know about it or is ignoring it,
Merkel said that NATO membership would have damaged Ukraine and that Putin would have seen it as akin to a “declaration of war,” according to Deutsche Welle.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/06/08/angela-merkel-interview-russia-ukraine-war-nato/
You saying you are "parroting nothing" is meaningless when you are parroting the Kremlin tropes, I tried to explain to why countries are rushing to join NATO but you seem to deliberately ignore it, why do you think countries join NATO, as I will probably never get a straight and honest out of you I will tell you......because they want to live in peace!
NATO was never a threat to Russia!
-
1
-
2
-
I think it might be safe to say that the Met Police under the leadership of Mark Rowley has totally lost the plot.
The same officer that said that Swastikas were not necessarily offensive was seen telling some young lads that carrying the English national flag was offensive. 🙁
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
31 minutes ago, sirineou said:Regardless of the reason why countries join NATO . all arguable , the fact remains that they do , and as much as Russia might or might not be a thereat to them, so are they to Russia.
I have a question though. If Russia finds it difficult to occupy Ukraine, (a non NATO country and much weaker militarily than NATO) ),how the hell would Russia be a threat to the whole of NATO before it's eastern expansion?
And if Finland and Sweden were in fear of invasion from Russia , what would prevent NATO to assist them if indeed were invaded. Is NATO the only alliance available to European countries? To me it sounds like
all of you are repeating American talking points, and frankly it is becoming boring.
And it seems to me that you are parroting official Kremlin propaganda, you were the one that wrongly stated "NATO expansion" and I repeat the evidence speaks for itself, Finland and Sweden had no intention of ever joining NATO until Putin decided he would invade a sovereign country Ukraine, and as a result Sweden and Finland did join NATO out of fear that they might be the next ones on Putins shopping list, thus making Putin the best salesman that NATO could ever haver wished for.
NATO was never a threat to Putin and you repeating Kremlin lies is very disingenuous!
And if Finland and Sweden were in fear of invasion from Russia , what would prevent NATO to assist them if indeed were invaded. Is NATO the only alliance available to European countries? To me it sounds like
It is better to be part of a family than relying on handouts, being a NATO member should guarantee you assistance when the Russian thugs come a knocking.
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
22 minutes ago, stevenl said:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparisons_between_Israel_and_Nazi_Germany
Regarded antisemitic by some, considered acceptable by others.
Would you like to lay your cards on the table and tell us whether you think that comparing Israelis to Nazis is acceptable?
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
13 hours ago, sirineou said:Or war in defence of NATO expansion.
Countries join NATO because of their distrust of Russia and for no other reason, Finland and Sweden are a testament to that for without Russia there would be no need for NATO. NATO is not a country and you offer very little in logic to your meaningless post!
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
1 hour ago, Jumbo1968 said:
I think Johnson’s misdemeanours were more than a beer, for a start he lied to the Queen, then lied again in Parliament denying any involvement in parties and prorogued Parliament illegally.
Judging by what we saw of the Boris Johnson party, I hope I'm never invited to one, but a Keir Starmer party is another kettle of fish......Chicken Korma for me Keir, Angela Raynor will have her usual chips with mushy peas.
-
30 minutes ago, Neeranam said:
Of course not, and I have no idea why that troll is replying to me, he was blocked a long time ago and he knows why, for continual insults and false claims like this.
The problem you have is you class everyone that has a different opinion to yourself as insulting you, you have all but a few members on here on ignore (or so you say) now the laws of averages deem that all on ignore have not insulted you. You seem to have a very fragile mindset and take offence at everything. What false claims were made about you.....that's correct, none.
-
2
-
-
13 minutes ago, Neeranam said:
Of course not, and I have no idea why that troll is replying to me, he was blocked a long time ago and he knows why, for continual insults and false claims like this.
Your troll posts have been reported, it is totally unacceptable to insult other members using a 3rd party, if you have issues use a moderator!
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, Gandtee said:
I'm ninety. Old age? I'm not looking forward to it.😉
Respect.
-
1
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:
It's interesting that you post something entirely factual and 2 ?people give it a laugh emoji.
It's more than interesting that you would sooner talk about other posters than the subject at hand.
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:
Confirmation you need to get a grip
+1.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, simple1 said:
Your choice, but then you will remain in ignorance.
I have explained to you, if you cannot comprehend the written word that is no fault of mine!
-
1
-
Scotland's controversial new hate crime laws come into force
in World News
Posted
We'll take that as a I cannot answer it, you made the statement that Yousaf speech wasn't racist, it seems you are outnumbered here with your cheap tawdry point scoring.