-
Posts
1,527 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Red Phoenix
-
-
2 hours ago, watthong said:
I just did that, they replied with "Now the product [30mbps] is out of stock. Unlimited internet customers have a maximum speed of 15mbps. Are you interested in using it first?"
On the other hand, looks like Melon Thai is having it again, though the price is 1k more than last year..
In short the stock availability seems to change month to month.
Thanks to @sungod I ordered end of April that 1-year 30 Mbps Unlimited Download SIM at Mobile2You, and it was delivered next day. Price has indeed doubled (2.780, - THB) since my previous one, but even so it is still a bargain.
-
-
Two quotes from the article:
#1 - Although he did not delve into the specifics of his methodology, he emphasised the gravity of the situation given the concerning statistics provided.
#2 - Furthermore, Dr Thira underscored the importance of continued personal protective measures, advocating for the widespread use of face masks, particularly in outdoor settings, as a vital safeguard against the virus.
>>> Hmmm...
- 1
-
On 5/14/2024 at 10:10 AM, Liquorice said:
Lazy speak, not short speak, and no, not everybody understands, and those incorrect terms do put people on the wrong foot.
Thanks Faz!
- 1
-
- Popular Post
I simply did put your question in https://chatgpt.com
and preceded it with "In Thailand..,"
Here the response:
> In Thailand, the difference between 95 and 97 petrol primarily lies in their octane ratings. Octane rating refers to the fuel's ability to resist knocking or pinging during combustion. Generally, higher octane ratings indicate better resistance to knocking.
- 95 petrol: This typically has an octane rating of 95. It is suitable for most regular cars and is the standard fuel used by many vehicles in Thailand.
- 97 petrol: This has a higher octane rating, usually around 97. It is considered a premium or high-performance fuel. Vehicles that require higher octane fuel or those with high-performance engines may benefit from using 97 petrol, as it can provide smoother performance and potentially better fuel efficiency.
Using a higher octane fuel than necessary for your vehicle doesn't usually offer significant benefits, but using a lower octane fuel than recommended can lead to engine knocking and reduced performance. It's always best to consult your vehicle's manual or manufacturer recommendations to determine the appropriate fuel type for your specific car.
- 1
- 1
- 1
- 4
-
4 minutes ago, brianthainess said:
The daftest rule IMO was both having to wear a mask in a car, when with your wife, whom you slept and lived with. Mucking Fental.
In the same category as being stopped by police when on a motorcycle wearing an integral helmet, and them fining you when you were not wearing a mask under that helmet...
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
42 minutes ago, Robert Paulson said:
What do companies do?
They create products we don’t need and either force or manipulate their use. It’s the same model over and over. Whether it be insurance or credit cards or food… that’s what they do.
Or rather companies try to create a need that their product or service will fill. As long as the public need is genuine, and there is no manipulation or deceit, that's fine. But when their solution is mandated, it becomes a whole different story.
-
5 minutes ago, dhupverg said:
"Overall, these findings, while evidencing a small benefit in symptom duration, do not support the use of ivermectin as treatment for COVID-19 in the community among a largely vaccinated population at the dose and duration we used," the authors wrote.
@TallGuyJohninBKK > Carefully read that conclusion again of the study you posted...
-
9 hours ago, IsaacMoore said:
From my experience, travel insurance can cover only one medical case. If you need to see a doctor for the second time, you'll have to pay fees.
As I have excellent - and dirt-cheap - health coverage in my home-country Belgium, I make use of travel-insurance - much cheaper than regular Health Insurance - while in Thailand that covers costs of repatriation when needed.
-
1 minute ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:
That was UK's autumn 2023 vaccination campaign, which peaked toward the end of last year as planned. They had a pause, and now just recently have begun their spring 2024 COVID vaccines campaign, as planned. It's the normal cycle in the UK.
Timing of the spring booster
You should be offered an appointment between April and June, with those at highest risk being called in first.
We are mid-away during that April-June appointment period for that Spring booster, dying (sic) to know how successful that Spring booster campaign will turn out...
- 2
- 1
-
14 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:
Predictably, you've posted long out-of-date info for the U.S. from a more than two month old article.
The most recent current info for the 2023-2024 monovalent vaccine in the U.S. is:
22.5% (22.1-22.8) for adults 18+
40.8% (39.7-41.8) among adults age 65+
https://www.cdc.gov/respiratory-viruses/data-research/dashboard/vaccination-trends-children.html
Or in the U.K., where the newest vaccines are recommended for the elderly and other higher-risk populations:
https://ukhsa-dashboard.data.gov.uk/
The bottom line is: COVID vaccines worked. Tens of millions of lives were saved from COVID. And the protections from the vaccines along with immunity from prior infections have dramatically reduced the numbers of COVID deaths and hospitalizations, as the virus also has mutated over time to in general become less severe.
Meaning people today in 2024, right now, don't feel the same sense of urgent health risk that they did in 2021 and 2022, early in the vaccine rollout and with the more deadly COVID variants circulating in those times, when COVID death and hospitalization numbers were skyrocketing.
The AUTUMN booster uptake for people +65 years of age in UK was 69,3% according to the UKHSA-dashboard you posted. But the report date for that figure is 15 Feb 2024, three months ago.
The peak period during which those boosters where administered was mid Sept 2023 to early Nov 2023. And by mid December no more of such boosters were administered.
We are now 5 months further, and In people aged 65 or over, the vaccine was 50% effective at preventing serious illness, for up to six months after a third dose.
Make your own conclusions...
Source: https://ukhsa-dashboard.data.gov.uk/topics/covid-19#vaccinations
- 1
-
8 hours ago, Martin71 said:
Ride a good few times a day.. if one of the 'black beltchers' is in front I drop back.. if safe to do so of course.. I am also quite rural.. and the local driving habits are erm ... interesting..
I live in the sticks (rural South Isaan), and fortunately in my neck of the woods masks are a rarity and nowhere are they imposed.
- 1
-
13 minutes ago, Liquorice said:
You can't and don't extend a Non Imm 0 visa, and you know better than that.
Of course I know, it was short-speak which everybody understands, and in this case there is no risk of it putting people on the wrong foot.
-
7 minutes ago, Liquorice said:
No idea why you want to complicate your given position.
New Non O based on Thai spouse for re-entry to Thailand.
1 year permit of stay based on Thai spouse from Immigration.Less hassle, less cost.
You can take out voluntary Health Insurance as desired from any Insurer, as opposed to being restricted to a TGIA Insurer.
Good advice by @Liquorice
Don't get yourself in the quagmire of the Non Imm OA compliant Health-insurance, which is mandated when applying for and extending a Non Imm OA Visa.
Due to that @#$%^ mandatory Health-Insurance it is only in very specific cases that applying for that Visa might be considered (e.g. if you do not have or definitely do not want to keep +400K on a personal Thai bank-account).
Re the other option you mention:
Applying for and extending a Non Imm O Visa for reason of retirement does indeed involve far less administrative red-tape than the Non Imm O Visa for reason of marriage. But the latter only requires +400K on your personal Thai bank-account in the period from 2 months pre application till the actual Permission to stay stamped is stamped in your passport, while the Non Imm O Visa for reason of retirement requires you to permanently keep +800K during 5 months of the year and +400K during the intermediate 7 months.
-
Here a link to a study whether COVID-19 vaccination affects long-COVID symptoms.
> https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38324547/
And this small scale study confirms that the vaccinated have a higher chance of getting long-COVID than non-vaccinated people.
Note: As it is a short study, I posted full text below.
Objective: The current study aimed to identify the association between COVID-19 vaccination and prolonged post-COVID symptoms (long-COVID) in adults who reported suffering from this condition.
Methods: This was a retrospective follow-up study of adults with long-COVID syndrome. The data were collected during a phone call to the participants in January-February 2022. We inquired about their current health status and also their vaccination status if they agreed to participate.
Results: In total, 1236 people were studied; 543 individuals reported suffering from long long- COVID (43.9%). Chi square test showed that 15 out of 51 people (29.4%) with no vaccination and 528 out of 1185 participants (44.6%) who received at least one dose of any vaccine had long long- COVID symptoms (p = 0.032).
Conclusions: In people who have already contracted COVID-19 and now suffer from long-COVID, receiving a COVID vaccination has a significant association with prolonged symptoms of long-COVID for more than one year after the initial infection. However, vaccines reduce the risk of severe COVID-19 (including reinfections) and its catastrophic consequences (e.g., death). Therefore, it is strongly recommended that all people, even those with a history of COVID-19, receive vaccines to protect themselves against this fatal viral infection.
- 1
-
29 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:
Thailand MoPH Weekly COVID report for May 5 - 11, 2024:
--1,880 new COVID hospitalizations, averaging 269 per day, up 88 / 4.9% from the prior week
--11 new COVID deaths, down 1 / 8.3% from the prior week
--588 current COVID patients hospitalized in serious condition (pneumonia symptoms), up 87 / 17.4% from the prior week (dark purple)
--237 current COVID patients hospitalized requiring intubation/ventilation to breathe, up 50 / 27% from the prior week (light purple)
Cumulative figures since the start of the current year are COVID new hospitalizations (14,937) & COVID deaths (104).
Of the 11 new official COVID deaths, the MoPH below is reporting that 4 were male and 7 female. By age, 10 were 70 and above, and one was age 60-69.
https://ddc.moph.go.th/covid19-dashboard/?dashboard=main
Reported weekly COVID new hospitalizations have now risen for the past 9 consecutive weeks since mid-March and more than tripled over that period, as follows for the weeks ending:
March 16 -- 501
March 23 -- 630
March 30 -- 728
April 6 -- 774
April 13 -- 849
April 20 -- 1,004
April 27 -- 1,672
May 4 -- 1,792
May 11 -- 1,880
The latest weekly new COVID hospitalizations total is Thailand's highest since mid-June 2023, when the total hit 2,158. Thailand's weekly new COVID hospitalizations peaked last spring at 3,085 in early June amid a similar run-up that began in mid-April.
As I wrote several times before, one should look at these figures in context.
The population of Thailand stood at 71.85 million in January 2024.
And so these cumulative figures since the start of the current year translate into:
# COVID new hospitalizations (14,937) > stands for 1 COVID hospitalization per 4.810 persons during that 4.5 month period
# COVID deaths (104) > stands for 1 COVID death per 690.865 persons during that 4.5 month period
Pretty scary he?
Oh yes, and of the 11 new official COVID deaths, the MoPH below is reporting that 4 were male and 7 female. By age, 10 were 70 and above, and one was age 60-69.
I think that pretty much shows that COVID could be a small risk for the ELDERLY, but that it is a Big Nothing-burger for the younger and working-age population.
And hey, why would the Public Health authorities want EVERYBODY to be up-to-date with their Covid-shots considering that they now finally admit that the shots have 'rare uncommon' adverse effects? And remember that these adverse effects are all short-term...
- 1
- 1
-
8 minutes ago, stevenl said:
Why are you ignoring the explanation by one of the authors? Don't like his explanation or maybe you know better?
The study mentions" "we observed significantly higher risks of myocarditis following the first, second and third doses of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 as well as pericarditis after the first and fourth dose of mRNA-1273, and third dose of ChAdOx1, in the 0–42 days risk period."
And the cherry on the cake > Quote from the Funding Statement of that study: "The GCoVS project is supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of a financial assistance award totalling US$10,108,491 with 100 % per cent funded by CDC/HHS."
Whose bread i eat...
Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24001270?via%3Dihub
- 1
- 1
-
24 minutes ago, stevenl said:
I trust the study authors more than a anti-vax conspiracy loon.
> Researchers found HIGHER than expected cases that they deemed met the threshold to be potential safety signals for multiple AESIs, including for Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), myocarditis, and pericarditis.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
15 minutes ago, Robert Paulson said:A new study for you all to ponder over while drinking your morning coffee
For some reason I have more confidence in the results and conclusion from the study, than how the FactCheckers did (try to) 'debunk' it as addressed in TGJ in BKK's posts. But that's just me folks, a deluded anti-vax conspiracy loon...
- 1
- 1
- 2
-
Try the free https://www.chess.com/play/online
It allows to play short (10 min each) or regular games with opponents of similar strength (ranging from absolute beginner to seasoned professional).
The site features also puzzles, learning (e.g. opening theory) and much much more.
-
12 minutes ago, proton said:
Just had a look the 'controversial' Thai music thread on TT, er because it was in Thai is still locked! so much for free speech. Not worth supporting.
Smithydog
Topic has been permanently locked from further postings.
One member has chosen not to respect the Moderators' requests and has gone on to abuse a Moderator. Yinn, the Moderation Panel will address you further directly regarding your comments and actions that forced us to close this thread.
Moderators also identified multiple videos that fail to meet Forum Guidelines and they have been deleted for breaches of the following:
Rule 1 - Use English Language only when posting.
The current TT Head Moderator is still regularly confronted with the 'heritage' from the previous moderators, and in such cases he removes the blocks, A simple request suffices...
- 2
-
6 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:
Some seem to find humour in that. I suspect they'll toss the invitation. No problem. As I said, there's now a forum to suit everyone.
And it is not an either/or choice. The current AN Forum has its merits and strong points, reason that I am a contributing member to both Fora. But open and honest debate on controversial subjects, allowing all points of view is not one of them.
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:
I have heard THAT one, before....
> Only this time, it is genuine as the consequence of a Free Speech policy is that it also applies to viewpoints that are controversial.
- 2
-
8 minutes ago, ChaiyaTH said:
To be honest, it would be less than a day work, to setup a forum using the same software, to have the same forums and subforums, but then with free speech. Or could just use like https://mybb.com/
AseanNow and ThaigerTalk can peacefully co-exist besides each other (I am a member of both).
It goes without saying that due to its much larger member-size some AseanNow sub-fora on non-controversial subjects are quite interesting (e.g. the Visa-forum) and these are my mean reason to visit and post on AN.
- 1
Which "conspiracy theories" do you believe are true (or have some basis in truth)?
in ASEAN NOW Community Pub
Posted
Clearly a conspiracy theory...
I can't believe this is news to anyone. We were taught this at school 50 years ago , people breathe in oxygen and breathe out CO2, plants turn CO2 into oxygen…