Red Phoenix

Those "too many s*** posters" don't seem to be bored to respond to the threads posted in this Covid/Vaccine sub-forum of the Off the Beaten Track forum. There are many sub-forums on AseanNow which I never open as I am not interested in the subjects covered there. So I suggest you do same for this sub-forum. And of course I won't stop adding content to this Covid/Vaccine sub-forum just because some members are bored with the subject. Have a nice 'jab adverse effect'-free day.

What if millions of Americans didn’t die from a virus…but from the medical rituals we were told would save them? What if ventilators weren’t life support— but death machines disguised as care? What if lockdowns weren’t for your protection— but your programming? This isn’t about the vaccine. This is about what happened before that. Inexperienced clinicians Overused ventilators Lockdowns that rewired the human psyche Once the death count rose from these measures, they could then justify the experimental vaccine. This was never about saving lives. It was about conditioning minds. > The above is an Intro to an archived premium article by Franklin O'Kanu on his Unorthodoxy website. Source: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/how-hospitals-became-killing-fields

Well-written and easily understandable article by Nick GAMBRUNO on Doug Casey's International Man website Source: https://internationalman.com/articles/3-shocking-truths-most-people-dont-know-about-money-in-bank-accounts/ = = = Henry Ford once astutely observed that a revolution would occur overnight if people truly understood the banking and monetary system. That’s because modern banking is an elaborate illusion—one that lulls people into a false sense of security… until it’s too late. Large banks can fail within hours, and life savings can vanish overnight. The US banking system is particularly vulnerable. So, why do so many people place their confidence—and life savings—into such a fragile system? It’s because they don’t understand three fundamental truths about modern banking: #1. The money isn’t yours. #2. The money isn’t actually there. #3. The money isn’t really money. You can read the full article here > https://internationalman.com/articles/3-shocking-truths-most-people-dont-know-about-money-in-bank-accounts/

People who received a flu shot this winter were MORE likely to get the flu, a major new study shows Flu shots don't work. We need to stop pretending they do. They should be pulled from the market unless and until large, long-term placebo-controlled studies prove they're safe and effective. Source: https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-people-who-received-a-flu = = = Excellent article/reporting by Alex Berenson on his 'Unreported Truths' substack. Here the intro to the article: > A big new study has offered yet more evidence that flu shots do not work - and may sometimes even increase the chances people will get influenza. With flu deaths in the United States soaring in 2025 despite aggressive vaccination efforts, when will public health bureaucrats admit the truth of their failure? Adults who received a flu shot were 27 percent more likely to get the flu this winter, Cleveland Clinic researchers found. You read that right. Their risk was higher. “We were unable to find that the influenza vaccine has been effective in preventing infection,” the researchers wrote, in a masterpiece of understatement. You can read the full - worthwhile - article here > https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-people-who-received-a-flu And the pre-print of that major Cleveland Clinic study can be accessed here: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.30.25321421v3

Hope your daughter had a fully recovery from the Covid-shot. Like yourself I don't know anyone that died from COVID. But I did know three people where the jab was the final drop in their already existing co-morbidities bucket. And several people in my small Isaan village were hospitalized shortly after receiving their 'safe and effective' shot. Also I don't know anybody that regretted their decision to skip the shots (let alone die or be hospitalized). On the other hand. I know only a handful of people that thoroughly regret getting jabbed, due to their health having declined considerably and them blaming it on the shots. But I do know several people that are now experiencing severe health-troubles but do not make the link with the jabs which they took. And if you hint to it, they get angry because 'everybody knows that the shots saved millions of lives' and if they had some health issues shortly after the jab 'it would have been worse, if they hadn't taken the shots'.

LOL indeed. As it are always those that get their distorted scraps of 'knowledge' from the MSM, and then parrot it from their pro-Vaccine throne, that dismiss posts with another point of view as 'utter nonsense'.

That's correct, but I cannot think of any reason for him not being able to apply for the 1-year marriage Visa extension now. If it's the 400K that has not been for the required time on his Thai bank-account, he could 'buy some time' by applying for the 60-day extension for reason of marriage (if he didn't use that option yet). @pkspeaker > Some info on the reason why you wrote that you cannot extend it, might provide some other options than applying for a new Non Imm O Visa in your home-country.

In the last month before expiry of your current Permission to stay, you can apply for a 1-year extension of that current Permission to Stay you have based on your original Non Imm O Visa for reason of marriage, at your local Immigration Office. When doing so keep in mind that it can take almost 1 month before the 1-year extension will be approved (it needs divisional HQ approval), and during that period you should stay in Thailand. And when you get the final 1-year extension approval stamp in your Passport at your local Imm Office, you can at that moment buy a Re-Entry Permit, which will keep that Permission to stay valid when leaving Thailand. So then there is no need to apply for a new Non Imm O Visa for reason of marriage in your home-country, as that Re-Entry Permit will then allow you to enter Thailand again before its expiry date (1 year after your current Permission to stay expiry date). > Doing as mentioned above, will save you the hassle of having to go through the Visa and extension process again. Note that if you on return from USA only intend to stay less than 5 months before departing again, that there is also the option of entering Visa Exempt (providing you a 60 days Permission to stay), then applying for a 30-day extension of that Permission at your local Imm Office, and then applying for an additional 60-day extension for reason of marriage. So that's approx 5 months with minimal bureaucratic hassle.

They died with Covid because they were unhealthy. ... not to mention the double-whammy of - denying them treatment with proven life-saving remedies, and - deadly hospital protocols for those that were hospitalized.

Vaccines aren't for emergency use but to prevent a disease from hurting or killing people.Some seem to doubt the facts they've saved millions of lives, but some don't understand history either. Johng was of course fully correct in what he wrote. The covid-19 'vaccines' (which are actually gen-therapies) were fast-track approved for emergency use by the FDA under an EUA (emergency use authorization). Remember that early May 2023 the Covid-19 pandemic was declared 'over' by the WHO. But the CDC keeps on recommending COVID-19 Vaccines for Young Children 6 Months-5 Years. So where is the 'emergency' to STILL inject infants with that experimental poison? "Saved millions of lives" > a sick joke that is getting more and more backlash now that the longer-term effects of the shots are wrecking havoc and cannot be denied anymore (think the explosion of rapidly emerging cancers in all age-categories).

Multiple studies have been conducted, and they consistently indicate that +90% of adverse effects following vaccination, are NOT reported in VAERS. Some of the reasons for this are not being aware of VAERS's existence, the huge administrative burden to file a report, etc. It is not and never has been my intention to monger fear in those that have chosen to get the shots. And it is not true that 'nothing can be done about it' once you have been vaccinated and are suffering side-effects. But first you need to consider the possibility that the shots are slowly but steadily wrecking havoc in your body (think the worldwide explosion of agressive cancers), and that even when you do not experience any negative effects now, that all is not fine. As long as you are in denial of that possibility, you will not even consider that the symptoms you are experiencing are caused by the shots, and go for symptom-treatment treatments that will not address the root-cause. Know that there are many effective vax-detox protocols available, that can slow down, stop and sometimes even completely reverse the harm the shots are doing, and will continue doing (the spike-protein in the mRNA shots does not have an OFF switch). So obviously the sooner you start with this, the better. It is well-known that it can take more that 10 years before 'unexpected' effects of vaccines will finally manifest themselves. And there are many AN members that have suffered adverse effects as a result of the shots, and several have even provided testimonies to that in the threads on Covid-vaccines. The evidence at this point of time is so monumental, that it needs URGENT investigation and that in mean time the further roll-out of these poison-shots should be halted (hence the PETITION urging RFK jr to do exactly that).

Oh dear... First - Trump is NOT a medical expert and never claimed to be one. Second - Trump NEVER said that people should inject bleach to kill the virus. His words and context were deliberately twisted into that fake nonsense claim. Third - It was actually Biden who stated that he former president once told people to "inject a little bleach in your arm; it'd be all right." Biden used that false claim, as a cheap shot at his opponent. I don't trust fact-checkers, but credit where credit is due and the Snopes Fact-Check provides the full story in all its details. > Fact Check: Trump Didn't Advise People to 'Inject Bleach' to Treat COVID-19. But This Is What He Did Say Link: https://www.yahoo.com/news/fact-check-trump-didnt-advise-233300994.html

VAERS is NOT meant as a tool to determine the causes of any adverse events following vaccination. It is meant to work as a 'signal-provider' to investigate the underlying causes when there are spikes in adverse effects reports after vaccination. +1,6 million reports since the roll-out of the Covid-19 vaccines (more than all other reports on vaccine adverse effects over all the years combined), and there is nothing to see here? And knowing that studies indicate that VAERS-reports are only the tip of the iceberg, and that more than 90% of adverse effects following vaccination are NOT being reported.

I am not going to spend my sunday afternoon looking for more examples of their biased fact-checking. Especially since it is obvious from your response that it will be brushed under the table as the odd exception (it is not). But the one example I provided is a blatant, easily verificable and deliberate LIE which they presented as a Fact-check. I remember that one very well because in threads on the Forum at the time, whenever I correctly stated that the covid-19 vaccines were experimental, my posts were either deleted or dismissed as 'conspiracy nonsense' using the Reuters Fact-check as proof.

you are absolutely wrong . but, hopefully (since you believe me on the others)... you will dig a little deeper into those two you doubt me on. cmon, you can do it (Please do not look on google for "fact checks" or truth .......... THEY TOO win the prize for selective bias ! @fredwiggy > I remember an article about a Reuters Fact-check claiming that "Covid-19 Vaccines are not experimental ". That's a blatant lie, as the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine was only approved by the FDA a couple of months AFTER Reuters made that fact-check claim. I looked up the well-researched article written by web-developer Stijn de Witt, aptly titled: "Why I don’t trust Reuters". Here is the link > https://stijndewitt.com/2021/08/26/why-i-dont-trust-reuters/ It's only one of the many instances, where Reuters 'twists' its Fact-Check reports. So as to provide ammunition to mainstream media to dismiss any facts contrarian to the accepted narrative. They use a whole range of tactics, e.g. only focusing on one minor detail from a complex event, to dismiss the whole story as non-factual. But in the example stated Reuters is caught with its pants-down and given the total trust and cloud which they have, never bother to correct their Fact-checks. Needless to say that on subjects which I researched well, that I don't trust their fact-checking after having seen too many of such biased fact-check claims.

Why do authorities quickly stop any excavations almost every single time when a potential history-changing discovery is made… Source: https://strangesounds.substack.com/p/why-do-authorities-quickly-stop-any = = = Are they trying to hide something? So much of our past is kept hidden from us... Just like in the case of the chambers at Gunung Padang, Indonesia or Göbekli Tepe, Turkey… Gunung Padang, Indonesia… Gunung Padang is a giant megalithic structure in West Java, Indonesia, and was likely built thousands of years before the accepted date for the dawn of civilization, according to newly published research that suggests the famous site may be home to the world’s oldest pyramid. Göbekli Tepe, Turkey… Gobekli Tepe WILL NOT be fully excavated‼️ > Is it a coincidence that that in both cases the WEF (World Economic Forum) is associated with archaeological excavations at ancient sites? You can read the short article in full here > https://strangesounds.substack.com/p/why-do-authorities-quickly-stop-any

Source: https://www.change.org/p/urge-robert-f-kennedy-jr-to-immediately-ban-covid-vaccines-and-investigate = = = Jenna McCarthy who has a substack devoted to Covid-19 Vax-issues, wrote and published an Open Letter on that substack < https://jennasside.rocks/p/an-open-letter-to-robert-f-kennedy >. That Open Letter was addressed to RFK jr to urge him to immediately ban covid-vaccines and investigate. And many of her readers/followers then asked her to spread it widely and issue it as a Petition addressed both to RFK jr and president Trump. When you feel same way as her - read the well-written Open Letter - you can opt to sign the Petition and share it via e-mail, Facebook, X, etc. Really easy to do and worthwhile as it is absolutely urgent to stop this assault on people's health. You can read the Petition and the Open Letter here > https://www.change.org/p/urge-robert-f-kennedy-jr-to-immediately-ban-covid-vaccines-and-investigate

You are free to block and ignore the content of the Vaccines sub-forum in this 'Off the Beaten Track' forum. That 'Off the Beaten Track' forum has been created to discuss controversial issues, rather than block or censor them. Often, like in the case of Covid-19 and Vaccines, several AseanNow members have a different view that does not align with the 'accepted narrative' and hence not allowed to be openly discussed on the regular Forum pages. So after years of only reading MSM-narrative confirming posts on the Forum, being confronted with other views might come as a shock. But once again, when offended by the issues being discussed here, you are free not to participate or post your opinion on the subject. And although the discussions can be heated, note that we try to keep it civil.

https://www.change.org/p/urge-robert-f-kennedy-jr-to-immediately-ban-covid-vaccines-and-investigate

Only 10, there are thousands saying the opposite. Are you familiar with the Black Swan analogy, which is the litmus test for accepting a scientific hypothesis as the current best approximation of reality? John Stuart Mill , rephrasing David Hume: “No amount of observations of white swans can allow the inference that all swans are white, but the observation of a single black swan is sufficient to refute that conclusion.” Applying that cornerstone of science to your post. The 'thousands of articles' that you mention (haven't come across any of them, but that's another matter) allegedly support the hypothesis that kids are healthier BECAUSE of being vaccinated compared to unvaccinated ones, And the studies that provide evidence of the opposite are the Black Swans that challenge this hypothesis. And they should not be automatically dismissed, when their results are not supporting the White Swan dogma. This is how science progresses in their quest for truth. When the methodology used by a Black Swan study is sound, and its results are consistently confirmed when that same methodology is used on a different population, we have an issue as both hypotheses cannot be correct at same time. So there must be a 'confounder' that leads to diametrical conclusions when testing the hypothesis. For this particular case, that's obviously the methodology being used to reach the conclusion. And it could be related to how the population was selected, what criteria were used to determine degree of health, the statistical analysis of the results, etc. So which hypothesis is most likely to be correct? We know that Big Pharma has an interest in promoting the White Swan 'popular' hypothesis that because of vaccination, the children receiving them are healthier than unvaccinated kids. And they are generous with funding for studies that 'prove' what they like to hear. And applications to perform studies that might lead to a different conclusion, often struggle for funding and face difficulties getting 'airplay' as Big Pharma also funds the major scientific journals that publish these studies (don't bite the hand that feeds you). The number of studies is hardly a criterion for 'truth'. Did you know that +90% of published studies are actually 'garbage' because they do not fully disclose the methodology they used, and when they do the results they present often cannot be reproduced. It is wise to always consider the question of 'cui bono' (who benefits) on the conclusions of articles/studies that address controversial issues when there are two (or more} parties with different interests.

If we don't make them accountable for the crimes they committed during the Covid-period, and let them get away with it, for sure they will do it again. As a minimum this evil couple and all their accomplishes should be investigated and arrested.

Christine Grady, a bioethicist at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) who is the wife of former White House Covid overlord Anthony Fauci, was among the health bureaucrats who received a layoff notice on Tuesday, reports say. The New York Times reported that Grady, head of the NIH’s Office of Bioethics, was sacked along with Dr. Jeanne Marrazzo, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) which Fauci used to head up, and Dr. Clifford Lane, a close ally of Fauci who oversaw clinical research. During the pandemic, Grady advocated for nurses losing their jobs if they refused the Covid shots. Fauci and Grady had a net worth of $11.5 million by the time of Fauci’s 2022 retirement, according to federal disclosures, a $7.6 million jump from before the pandemic, according to Open The Books. Grady was one of the authors credited on a study titled “The Ethics of Encouraging Employees to Get the COVID‑19 Vaccination” which was bankrolled by the NIH’s Clinical Center and the National Human Genome Research Institute. The study by Grady and her co-authors advise corporations it can “be ethically appropriate” to press employees to get the shot and to issue “clear articulation about the consequences of not complying with the policy.” > More details in the full article of how this 'very ethical' person got the boot Source: https://www.worldtribune.com/trump-administration-fires-faucis-wife/

For all the doubters whether this is a genuine and not a made-up story, here another link: https://slaynews.com/news/1-year-old-baby-dies-suddenly-cardiac-arrest-receiving-12-vaccines-once/ And yes, you do NOT find anything about it on the mainstream media (and probably never will). For comparison > A fear-stoking story like the young boy in Texas that died of measles gets nation-wide headlines to boost the uptake of vaccines, while his comorbidities are of course conveniently not mentioned. But this outrageous baby-death story - and it is far from unique - might invoke vaccine-hesitancy in parents for the truly insane Child Vaccination program in the US. And so the Big Pharma advertising dollars dependent mainstream media will not mention it. For the large majority of people, the mainstream media are their ONLY source of information, and everything that casts doubt on the narrative, is labeled by those same mainstream media as 'conspiracy theory', 'dangerous mis- or dis-information' and ridiculed, twisted or made suspicious. And from some of the reactions on this thread that's clearly a quite effective strategy. Because if it is not mentioned in the MSM or does not come from 'an accepted trustworthy source' (that supports the narrative) they automatically dismiss it, as it is a dissonant to their MSM-shaped beliefs. And it's painful to admit that you have been 'played' all of your life in believing what you are told by people with an agenda. Mark Twain was quite right when he wrote that “It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

Blind, dumb and ignorant beyond any help...