Cameroni

They all do separate polls and the result is then aggregated!!!

A smart move on your part, because almost all the many many areas the Poles annexed after 1918 were historically German for centuries. Danzig was originally a Viking settlement, Scandinavian and Prus made up the ethnic origin of this original settlement. But it is true that these lands came under the dominion of a Polish King eventually in the 10th to 12th century. In the 13th century the Danes conquered Danzig. This led to the city coming under the laws of Luebeck, Germany. Then the Brandenburger Konrad the 1st conquered Danzig. The the city fell to the Poles again however they fought with the Brandenburgers and then the Poles called the Deutsche Orden (!) to help them against the Brandenburgers. Because the Poles tried to stiff the Teutonic Order and failed to pay what they agreed to pay the Teutonic Knights occupied Danzig. The Teutonic Knights and the Poles settled their dispute with a treaty at Kalish in 1343. There upon an era of 66 years of peace followed. That was when the Hanseatic alliance made Danzig into what it became. After the Battle of Tannenberg when the Teutonic Order fell, the city of Danzig elected to rejoin Poland. However, with the peace of Thorn the Teutonic Knights again regained control of Danzig. In 1440 Danzig joined the Prussian League. With the second peace of Thorn Danzig became part of the Kingdom of Prussia for some time. However, Poland was still involved in the administration which led to a dispute upon which Danzig elected to go against the Poles. Danzig was the only city with a Polish population that did not join the Union of Lublin and when Stephan Bathory became King of Poland the city of Danzig refused to recognise him and instead declared for the emperor Maximilian II of Austria. Danzig was then in its golden period but a war between Sweden and Poland led to its decline Sweden occupied Danzig. It was not the Poles but the Danes and the Dutch which liberated Danzig. In the conflict between Catholics and Lutherans Danzig was then occupied by the Russians and Saxons. Prussian then annexed Danzig in the 18th century. After a brief French interlude Danzig again joined the Prussian Kingdom due to the Vienna Congress. Danzig's inhabitants fought for Germany in WWI. Only after Versailles was Danzig severed from Prussia. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geschichte_der_Stadt_Danzig#Geschichte_vom_7._bis_13._Jahrhundert

As you very well know Guernica was a highly limited experimental operation. It was in no way a targeted, systematic carpet bombing campaign to which the Luftwaffe allocated all its resources, like the RAF did with bombing German civilians after May 1940. Rotterdam was of course a mere pretext. It is a mendacious lie to suggest the British used Strategic bombing as retribution for Rotterdam, which was an accidental bombing of a butter factory anyway in the course of a major military operation. The real reason why the British switched to bombing civilians was not Rotterdam, but rather the fact that the RAF suffered unsustainable losses in daylight raids on military targets. That coupled with Britain's inability to fight back with her army in any meaningful way. The figures provided for the Rotterdam bombing are false, 814 civilians died in the Rotterdam bombing. The raid that caused these deaths was meant to be aborted, but a technical problem led to the raid going ahead despite the cancellation orders. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombardierung_von_Rotterdam_1940

I actually EXPLICITY said the British were not carpet bombing, but accidentally killed civilians in Wilhelmshaven. I mention Wilhelmshaven to illustrate that the British bombed Germany first, ie before Germany bombed Britain. 435 civilians did die in Wilhelmshaven due to British bombing raids.

Well, first of all CX File Explorer is a free app. It works by locating your laptops on the network. So you just open the app, the only set up required is to choose your laptop, type in the username and password you urse, and that's it. After you did that once, you just open the CX File Explorer App, choose that network link and you're straight into your laptop's storage. CX File Explorer even has a built in video player but if you don't want to use it you can pair it with VLC or any other video player of your choice. It's incredibly reliable and free. I was concerned at first because it uses WIFI not ethernet, but I have 2000 Mbps internet, so even with the Android box I get 500 Mbps, not an issue at all.

Yes, that's absolutely standard, use an AV receiver to connect to surround speakers. Ideally one with WIFI.

So you use the TV's built in video player, is it user friendly though? That's another advantage with CX File Explorer, you can use VLC or any video player you want.

Can't you read? It's not a "single poll". It's from The New York Times, The Philadelphia Inquirer and Siena College, three separate polls.

A way better solution than Plex. How do you play the files on the TV?

You're joking right? With Plex there's setting up the server, managing settings, and understanding all the features takes hours with Plex. Plus you have to pay for Plex to unlock all the features.

Yes, as Musk said, the ultimate DEI hire. How is this woman up in Pennsylvania by 3?

You don't need an extra TV box. As I explained you can installe CX File Explorer on a PC. I've used Plex and CX File Explorer is much better. Certainly Plex and KODI are not easier, they are fare more complex. With CX File Explorer you go to the app, press and you're straight into your PC. Much easier than Plex or KODI.

Oh now the polls are "meaningless"?

And yet, and yet...: "In the national poll, Harris and Trump were tied at 47% among the 2,437 likely voters polled Sept. 11-16, according to a survey by The New York Times, The Philadelphia Inquirer and Siena College." https://www.reuters.com/world/us/polls-shows-harris-trump-tied-nationally-tight-race-pennsylvania-2024-09-19/ So after Swift's "formidable" endorsement, the candidates are ......tied. Lol. So perhaps Swift's influence on politics is, well, zero...since Harris was actually doing better before her endorsement... I guess somebody needs to tell The Hill that young voters were always going to vote Harris anyway, this was never a key demographic for Trump. How do they get away with writing this nonsense?

In 2016, funnily enough, it was women that helped Trump win. "Clinton picked up 54 percent of women voters compared with Trump’s mere 42 percent. But Trump outperformed Clinton among white women, winning 53 percent of voters in that demographic. Drilling down further, he beat Clinton among white women without college degrees by 27 points. In the three states that decided the election — Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan — that margin was enough to send Trump to the White House."" https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/20/14061660/women-march-washington-vote-trump

I also think in Polls some people are reluctant to say that they will vote for Trump. But on election night they come out and vote for Trump. Hence these election night surges for Trump in 2016 and 2020.

I found an amazing solution to this very problem, as I also like to stream videos from my pc harddrive to my Samsung TV. There is an app called CX File Explorer. Despite it's plain name it's actually a game changer, because it's way more than a file explorer. It allows you to access your laptop via the same wireless network easily. You just create a network link in the app, put in the password and laptop name and that's it. Immediately this app will connect to your desktop. You can install CX File Explorer on a PC but you need to installe Blue Stack, which is a pain. To get around this issue I use a simple Android box, which allows you to install CX File explorer directly and is much easier to use. Pair that with a wireless keyboard and viewing heaven is accomplished.

Clinton went into the election up by 12% in the polls. https://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/23/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-presidential-polls/index.html So by that standard Kamala Harris is massively underperforming. What the pollsters were unprepared for in 2016 was for white male working class voters turning out to vote in large numbers, Trump won 73% to 27% in that demographic. To predict a Harris win now, is nothing but wishful thinking.

Paywall, alas not possible.

No link? You're a very naughty boy!!!

Why would you think Trump will lose? "Kamala Harris, Trump tied in nationwide New York Times poll" https://www.cbsnews.com/video/kamala-harris-trump-tied-in-nationwide-new-york-times-poll/

I know perfectly well about the various kinds of tests, you think this is some secret sacred knowledge, only you posess, but in reality a 12 year old can get it off google. I also studied carefully the studies for and against the effectiveness of masks, and my position is extremely well informed. So Chinese potash miners, huh? Overseas Banks? Aha. Do carry on. And if you could tell me what you're taking I wouldn't mind trying half a pill. Looks like a powerful trip.

Oh really? Really???? Let's see, shall we, MicroB? “There have been many studies attempting to prove whether the virus is infecting cells of the inner blood vessel wall or not. “By conducting our experiments using real, infectious virus rather than fragments of the virus’s spike protein, we can definitively say it is not.” https://www.uq.edu.au/news/article/2021/10/vascular-disease-covid-19-not-caused-viral-infection-of-blood-vessels Oh dear. Does that mean you were talking nonsense, MicroB? It does, doesn't it? These studies support the conclusion that SARS-CoV-2 does not confer endothelial cell damage and vascular thrombosis through direct viral infection of those cells. They further demonstrate that the levels of circulating virus are too low to infect even endothelial cells that express very high levels of hACE2, and therefore that most COVID-19 pathology arises due to aerosol infection of the nasal and pulmonary epithelium. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562591/ Yeah, looks like it does. Oh well.

Yes it does. And clearly you don't understand the science. Your links don't support your claim that Covid is a "vascular "disease. For instance your nature article just talks about the effects Covid can have on the vascular system. You obviously simply fail to understand that COVID-19 can impact the entire body and cause a wide range of symptoms and complications. However, the latest research shows that the vascular symptoms of COVID-19 are caused by inflammation and not COVID-19. This means COVID-19 is still considered a respiratory disease, but it can have serious effects on the vascular system. Medical professionals and researchers have been studying the link between COVID-19 and vascular symptoms since the beginning of the pandemic. They have learned that people with severe COVID-19 are at a risk of strokes, blood clots, and other vascular complications. These observations led to several hypotheses that COVID-19 was a vascular disease with respiratory symptoms and not a respiratory disease. Studies in 2020 and 2021 supported this theory. These studies concluded that although people with mild to moderate COVID-19 only had respiratory symptoms, COVID-19 was primarily a vascular disease. However, additional studies published later in 2021and into 2022 have contraindicated these findings. New studies indicate that COVID-19 doesn’t attack the vascular system at all. https://www.healthline.com/health/covid-respiratory-or-vascular Like I said, not hard to understand, MicroB. You just need to read up a bit more. I'm sure you'll get there.

Yah, there's a giant conspiracy to covertly set up Covid tests to generate positives for Rhinovirus. Okay. The Chinese I presume? Batwoman? Any other interestiing theories, MicroB? Lol.