Cameroni

Skripal was a traitor, the woman's offence, so he was punished with poison, the woman's weapon. That's justice. However, whilst Russia has the most advanced chemical weapons programme in the world, it has refrained from using it on Ukrainian soldiers. This restraint by Russia is surely now under reconsideration. If Russia wanted to do so it could unleash chemical warfare hell on Ukrainian soldiers, however, in this regard Russia has adhered to the laws of war. Clearly as regards poisoning Ukraine has not.

He did make it look like it was his fault when he accused his employer Paramount of paying a bribe. Clearly his ideological zealotry clouded his judgement. Though it may have been the case that he already knew he'd be let go by then and the bribe comment was just petulant retribution in his mind. Either way, like all Democrats, extremely poor judgement.

The moral bankrupt is you, celebrating the poisoning of Russian soldiers. Spare us your garbage.

It's because Trump positioned himself against the secret services. So they tried to sabotage him.

Looks like we're creating this "unhingedness" by encouraging snowflake rights. Society did extremely well for decades before it was mandated that now looking at a woman wil lbe prosecuted. This woman in the Dominik Bullock case responded in an unhinged way by calling police and making an issue out of someone looking at her. Even 10 years ago this would not have become an incident, since no women would have thought of calling police for someone staring at her. Now with a public campaign about this in London Underground these cases will sky-rocket of course. Anyone who's not deeply uncomfortable with a woman having the power to have you arrested for looking at her needs a reality check.

Emily Hill from the Spectator disagrees with you. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/is-it-really-a-crime-to-stare/

He didn't do any "unhinged things". He just looked at her. You want men to be prosecuted for looking at someone?

‘Staring’ (Sadiq Khan’s bright red public safety warning reads – with ominous eyeballs popping out of the ‘a’ and the ‘g’) that may be construed as ‘intense’ and of ‘sexual nature’ is now ‘sexual harassment’ and ‘not tolerated’. Should anyone ‘see it or experience it’ they are to text the British Transport Police or dial an 0800 sexual harassment hotline if they want to remain anonymous. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/is-it-really-a-crime-to-stare/

Protected from what? Looks? Too snowflake for me.

He obviously got angry because of how the girl responded and telling him not to stare at her. So he extended his legs and and refused to move when she told him to. He was not prosecuted for that, he was prosecuted for staring. British transport has launched a campaign to warn men they will be prosecuted if they stare at women. In the UK, a woman can now go to police and accuse a man of staring at her and they will arrest him and he'lll be prosecuted. For looking at a woman. This is not an isolated case.

He stared at the girl which got her all riled up. So they got into an argument. He sat next to the exit and extended his legs and refused to move for her. He didn't touch her and didn't verbally abuse her. She then called police and pressed charges against him. It was the staring that precipitated the prosecution. Indeed in the UK it is now clearly established that men can be prosecuted for staring at women: "Det Supt Sarah White, who leads BTP’s sexual offences team, dismissed the criticism and warned that her force is receiving daily reports of individuals committing sexual offences, including staring, across the country." https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/04/16/staring-tube-could-prosecuted-says-top-detective/ I do have kids, two daugthers in fact and I still find it distasteful that men get prosecuted for looking at a woman.

Lucky you don't live in England, men are arrested there for staring at women. https://www.itv.com/news/london/2022-03-14/man-who-kept-staring-at-woman-on-a-berkshire-train-is-jailed

It's not a "monk scandal". It's a promiscuous Thai woman slept with 10 men and blackmailed them for 9 million pounds scandal.

Letterman was the best. A giant among late show hosts. Colbert is a wet tissue next to him.

Hardly. CBS news had two versions of an interview with Kamala, one where they edited her word salad answer to shield her from backlash. Major news outlets pandering to one candidate and attempting to bend over backwards to portray her in a favourable light meant the entire democratic process was under threat due to CBS doctoring their interviews to make Kamala look more favourable. This lawsuit was well deserved and is very beneficial for the democratic process as it shows that mainstream news shows can't favour one candidate unduly, as CBS did with Kamala, by editing her interview. CBS was coercing the democratic process so to speak.

I had it too. It does go away, not dangerous.

Can't wait to see Trump do a bit about Colbert. Particularly as it's widely believed that Paramount's settlement of 16 million with Trump had a lot to do with the cancellation of Colbert. If Trump doesn't gloat, he must be very busy.

She's a criminal, a blackmailer. Wendy Bezos is the real pro, she slept her way to the top.

It's a non-issue, a cure for HPV 2 is already in the works. https://www.fredhutch.org/en/news/releases/2024/05/herpes-cure-with-gene-editing-makes-progress-in-laboratory-studi.html

Her rich husband left her because she was cheating. So she wanted to maintain her luxury lifestyle and decided to blackmail politicians and monks. Unbelievable. This woman will have given Thai woman a bad reputation all over the Western world. Any man with a Thai woman will be looked on with pity in the West now. Here, if you want to see the face of evil, here is the ugly biatch and the full story. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14912501/Thai-woman-35-filmed-having-sex-Buddhist-monks-blackmailed-millions-pounds.html

Ludicrous, it should spur demands for accountability of women. This woman had sex with 10 men and then blackmailed 9 million pounds out of them. The four noble truths of our age: 1 Women will lead to suffering 2. You can't escape this suffering 3. You better have cash aplenty 4. Her loyalty is proportional to your cash

Chiang May easily beats KL or Penang. Firstly it's always raining in KL. Then you have the annoying Muezzin calling for prayer every 3 hours, how annoying is that? And it's all over KL, even in the centre. KL also has a quality of visitors problem, it's a prime magnet for Saudis, Nigerians, and other Muslim countries, who mostly travel in huge groups, massive family groups. If you get a condo in KL you'll quickly find out how degraded it is because tons of Saudi families have stayed there with the kids destroying the place. if you walk down the main street of KL you actually feel unsafe, it's not clean, you can feel the sex tourism in the air, and yes KL has become a prime hub for prostitution. Whereas CM has a charming historic city centre, KL has a try hard modern centre, more like Picaddily in London or Times Square in NY, devoid of charm. There's no choice of sprawling themed cafes, no choice of elephant camps, no Mon Jam, no Mae Kampong. The food is not as good. And the worst: If you get a Thai massage in KL the masseuse will not massage you unless you put those ludicrous plastic knickers on! Getting a massage naked in KL is impossible. Chiang Mai is much more relaxed. Chiang Mai easily beats KL and Penang. Hands down. It's not even close.

No, they can't. There are laws of war. Once Russia wins this war they will have every right to bring those cowardly Ukrainian poisoners to justice. Absolutely disgraceful.

Poisoning! The woman's method. Fitting for Ukrainians I guess.

Those cowardly underhand Ukrainians know no shame. Disgraceful.