Cameroni

What does Taylor Swift think about all this though? She will decide the next election. Oprah said so.

Yes, of course the mining rights are not given away for free. If you take the Detour Lake mine for instance the Canadian government made about 4.9 million dollars in fees, taxes etc from that mine. The value of the Detour Lake Gold mine however is estimated to be in the billions. Whoever negotiated on behalf of the Canadian government should be fired surely?

How do you not die of embarassment posting claptrap like this, is what I'd like to know. Because there was a cyberattack on Estonia, for which there is not a shred of evidence mind you that it was the Russian government, Putin intends to invade Estonia? So I guess China intends to invade the US then? Since there were Chinese cyberattacks on the USA? I mean seriously, how do you get out of bed in the morning? Trade restrictions? So the US is basically going to invade the entire world then? I mean I literally cannot believe you would post such flimsy transparent non-evidence. Again the question is does Russia intend to invade the Baltics? The resounding clear answer is "NO". There is absolutely zero chance. Airspace violations? So Russia is also planning to invade England and Scotland then? I mean do you actually believe the utter drivel that you write? This is what I'd like to know.

What you don't seem to understand is that the mineral rights that adhere to the land are sold off to private gold mining companies. It is they who then own the rights. They acquire them to operate the gold mines. The Canadian government doesn't do that.

"Wilson pushed for sedition and espionage laws, adopted in 1917 and 1918, that made illegal certain speech about the war, including speech that might incite disloyalty within the military or be supportive of the enemy. These laws, which later were viewed as an instance of government overstepping the bounds of First Amendment freedoms, led to the conviction of several anti-war activists at the time. Wilson's attorney general, A. Mitchell Palmer, also led raids on communist and socialist groups, creating mass arrests and undermining First Amendment rights." https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/presidents-and-the-first-amendment/

There is criminal libel on the books in the US, i hate to break it to you. Obviously the executive branch has a lot to do with it, since it implemented the laws that constitute the libel laws in the US. Or you think those laws magically appeared out of thin air? Not if they're at university. In the 1980s and 1990s, more than 350 public universities adopted "speech codes" regulating discriminatory speech by faculty and students. Indeed they have, however, the executive can pass laws that limit free speech. Just like Illinois when they put group libel laws in place to protect blacks. Lol, so did the "speech codes" adopted by 350 public universities regulating discriminatory speech. Yet, oddly, they are still in place. So basically leftists can do it, just no anyone else, right?

She would. Those girls are bored as hell.

The whole ERM debacle is certainly a contender from Britain as well.

So what, that doesn't happen at university, does it? Religious and political activism by them should be banned. That's all. What are you on about? Self taught priests? Religious schools can instruct priests. Just not at university. A normal university is one dedicated to teaching and research. An abnormal one is Antioch, for instance where students are taught to obtain written contracts to kiss a girl, touch her breast and required to get "affirmed consent". That's not normal behaviour that is being taught at these universities. So pretty much all of them now. I am pro debate and pro-democracy, but you didn't learn democracy at university. Nor should you. It's not a political institution, but an academic one. There is no reason to debate feminism or socialism at campus. You Pattaya girlie bar addicts obviously don't follow the news; https://www.theguardian.com/news/2023/may/05/how-the-fall-of-edward-colstons-statue-revolutionised-the-way-british-history-is-told Lol, you're completely clueless, Heidegger taught at university under the Nazis. He was one of the pre-eminent lecturers at that time. You're seriously clueless, Germany prohibited Nazi parties, how could one possibly gain power? Maybe ease up on the gin and tonics. No they didn't you ignorant clown, they voted for the PDS and The Linke, pseudo communist parties. Plenty of pro-communists in Russia.

What are you on about, those German politicians were handpicked by the Americans, British, French and Russians. Of course they picked non-Nazis. There was always a small minority of opposition politicians in Germany, mostly underground. However, the universities did influence how the students turned out. Heidegger himself was routed for being antisemitic. So were many German politicians post 1945. The masses ARE weak willed. Just look at how the British now celebrate anti-white, anti-coloniali causes. Where did that come from? Universities and political activists. We're talking about Harvard and normal universities. Chapels and such can stay open, only overt religious activism and political activism would be banned. This is very reasonable. People can still support their country, presidents can still throw balls, none of that is political activism obviously , don't be obtuse. Stop talking nonsense, I don't want trade unions banned. Nor do I want to ban books. Only political activism. And 18 year olds are gullible af, they are basically in danger of being perverted by these political activists.

Trump can pass executive orders, they are laws. if he wants he can get a law passed that bans activism on campuses. That would be a very sensible thing to do to root out the leftwing cancer on campuses.

I know a super hot 23 year old there. I would do her.

Political activists on campus do not teach kids "to think for themselves". Don't talk nonsense. They want to ram their ideology down the gullible throats of the young. That's what they want. These political activists are using institutions of learning for something completely different. Political persuasion. That should be banned. Mercilessly.

Clearly you mean Königsberg. Which was annexed in 1945. Obviously we are talking of 2025. Not 1945. Putin has showed no signs whatsoever of being interested in the Baltics.

All activism. Ban it. Left or right. Education is no place for political ideological hate of either side. Religious crusading too. Sports is fine. Since when are sports teams political activism? Don't talk nonsense.

Powell has turned hawkish, so it is pretty clear he will not reduce interest rates in June. This should strengthen the dollar. Particularly if China indicates they're open to negotiate a deal. Tariffs are played out now. There has to be a dip, but Gold will keep going to 3500 and probably beyond, so buying the dip is the way to go.

Fed will not reduce interest rates in June. This will strengthen the dollar. So there may be dip in gold. A perfect opportunity to buy, to jump onto the 3500 train.

Ludicrous. Russia has shown precisely zero interest in the Baltics. Why would they want them anyway. What a nonsense.

Lol, you are so naive. That is what government does, what it has done for centuries. Or why do you think there are laws against defamation, incitement to violence, threats, "hate" speech, obscenity, national security, classified information, copyright....do you seriously think governments do not have the prerogative to determine what is free speech and what isn't? That's what they DO! For hundreds of years! My proposal would be this: BAN ALL POLITICAL ACTIVISM on campus. All of it. The problem is that leftwing ideologues are using university not for studies, but political activism. Just make it illegal.

Luidcrous, every single male knows when to stop a sexual advance, and does so, bar the criminal minority which is tiny. It has gone completely overboard with "affirmed consent" requiring a male to stop to ensure consent for a kiss, to touch a breast? Are you suggesting these things are desirable and good? No wonder this leftwing cancer thrives. Too many people indulge this insanity.

How does academia benefit from Doc Martens wearing shaven headed feminists screaming "No means No" on campus? Or demanding contract forms to touch your girlfriend's breasts, to kiss her, to ensure "affirmed consent"? How does academia benefit from radical marxists denying the world as it is today? Stop talking nonsense and celebrate this great president making the world a better place. This assault on universities was long overdue. Hopefully Trump will not go soft and eradicate the leftwing cancer from campuses.

No it doesn't, it says both countries would suffer, but China has less bullets. If therefore the trade war went ahead in full, the US would win.

Nonsense. This is in no way a free speech issue. Besides, there is a massively long list of limitations on free speech. These include: 1. Incitement of Violence (which feminists and many on the left routinely engage in on campus) 2. Threats (again a favourite tactic of feminists and leftist) 3. Fighting words (words likely to incite a public disturbance) 4. Inciting imminent lawless action. There are plenty of justifications for curtailing the left in universities.

Actually, you are mistaken on this point. Plenty of people think the US would in fact win a trade war: Why China Can’t Win a Trade War https://time.com/7276876/china-retaliatory-tariffs-us-trade-war/ China is highly dependent on foreign investment, its options in the trade war are very limited. All of them have great drawbacks for China. i don't hate China at all. I love China. I am just being realistic. In a trade war with the US, the Chinese will run out of bullets first. I am in no way predicting China's economy will collapse, however, a trade war WOULD certainly shave a number of points off of China's GDP. The Chinese would have to "eat bitterness" again. The question is not if China's economy will collapse. It won't. However, we are already seeing how China's economy is losing its lustre, even before the tarriffs. Lower growth, unemployment, real estate crisis, unhealty low birth rates, high dependency on foreign investment, low domestic demand, the problems for China go on and on and on. If the US really would go all out in a trade war, the US would win. China's economy would suffer greatly. Nevertheless, the US economy would also suffer, so it is actually more likely that there will be a trade deal done, which will greatly benefit the US. Either way, the US will win. China will lose.

Well Trump is tackling that problem, he is carving out the bloated bureacracy. He is making the rich corporate entities build factories for Americans workers.