Cameroni

Brand was not irrelevant. A lot of his content was wildly popular. He posted on relationships and many other things. It's a shame that his past misdeeds will qualify his undoubted deep insights gained by dancing with the devil. But you live by the sword, you die by the sword.

What a pile of steaming caca de toro. You claimed 1929 was wave 2. So show the graph with the wave count. Unless you can't of course? Btw, I put it in logarithmic, it's even LESS useful. Since you made the claim, I suggest you show the chart with the wave count.

Women have been making allegations against Russell Brand long before he appeared on Youtube. "Four women have made allegations of sexual assaults between 2006 and 2013 as part of an investigation by The Times, The Sunday Times and Channel 4 Dispatches - allegations he denies. Since publication, The Times said it has been contacted by "several women" with claims about Brand, but said their allegations have not yet been investigated and "will now be rigorously checked"." https://news.sky.com/story/met-police-respond-to-russell-brand-claims-and-urge-sexual-assault-victims-to-contact-them-12962142

BBC investigates claim Russell Brand exposed himself to woman in Los Angeles https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/sep/21/bbc-investigates-claim-russell-brand-flashed-a-woman-in-los-angeles

You just have to remember how Brand called up the daugther of Andrew Sachs, the things he said, to recall what kind of human being Brand is. It's funny how all these false prophets try to claim they found God. The same with Roosh V who is now a bearded laughing stock Orthodox priest or some joke like that. Not to mention Jim Jones or David Koresh. The worst of the worst always pretend to be the lambs of God.

Karma is absolutely real. I know, because I have experienced it. The universe keeps score, and nobody can escape. Call it Karma, call it divine justice, whatever you like. It's real af. Now as a man is like this or like that, according as he acts and according as he behaves, so will he be; a man of good acts will become good, a man of bad acts, bad; he becomes pure by pure deeds, bad by bad deeds; And here they say that a person consists of desires, and as is his desire, so is his will; and as is his will, so is his deed; and whatever deed he does, that he will reap. — Brihadaranyaka Upanishad Long before the bible told you "Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap.", the Indians already knew this long ago. Karma is real.

Our selfless politicians at work and in full view. Snout in the trough.

That's precisely why he would rape, isn't it, because he is so used to women lining up and getting naked to bang him, he cannot take "no" seriously. He is convinced he is truly irresistible and she really wants it. If you are always shown that women desire you and want you, when a woman does not, it becomes a far more interesting challenge. So he wants the one who does not consent far more than those who line up naked. You always want what you cannot have.

Mao? " It became a state secret that he suffered from multiple lung and heart ailments during his later years.[226] There are unconfirmed reports that he possibly had Parkinson's disease[227][228] in addition to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also known as Lou Gehrig's disease.[229] He suffered two major heart attacks, one in March and another in late June, then a third on 2 September, rendering him an invalid." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Private_Life_of_Chairman_Mao Karma, or divine justice, is very real. Nobody escapes it. You will reap what you sowed. This is the law of the universe. Even in his lifetime Mao was viewed with disgust by those close to him, if you read "The Private Life of Chairman Mao" by his personal physician you will see that even those closest to him lost respect for Mao. The universe keeps score. You will reap what you sowed. If Russel Brand looks in the mirror, he knows he is telling lies, and he DID rape those women. Though "oral rape" is of course a bit ludicrous, he surely did truly rape those women. But let the trial confirm it.

Exactly. This is why vetting takes a long time and cannot be done in one day or one week. For the longest time a woman will play a role, hide her bad sides and her true self. Even her past, her history. Only in time is all this revealed, but revealed it will be. You should of course never take her out to an expensive meal, this is leading with your wallet and you are training her to expect the wrong thing. Unless you go to fancy restaurants every day of course and that's the real you. But you should show her the real you, what you really do in your normal life. It is not good to lie to woman and counter productive. She will lie to you of course, and you must always keep your eyes open.

This is extremely important today. We are now faced with an epidemic of mentally ill women. Narcissists, and women who only seek fun. They have been trained all their lives to get that dopamine hit, that feel good, which social media provides when they get a like or view. However, when you are in a relationship with someone you cannot keep giving her that dopamine hit. Eventually this will not work anymore. The woman with integrity and good character will understand that the honeymoon phase cannot last and will work to resolve issues that arise because of this start of the "mundane", when boredom sets in. However, the narcissist, the woman who seeks only fun, she will quickly seek out a new supply of dopamine, in the guise of a new guy. Even if he is not as good as you on paper, he is new and you are old news. So before you truly commit to a girl, you need to see if she is a narcissist, a seeker of fun, someone whose commitment is worthless, someone who does not in fact commit. Someone who is just a clown, playing a part. They will always try to convincec you that you are to blame. But you are not, she is a clown playing a role, she is mentally ill, she is a narcissist. Make sure she is not this.

Stop talking nonsense and do as I asked. You claimed 1929 was wave 2. So POST the graph where this is an actual possibility. I would love to see it. Or is it too difficult for you?

You're probably right. I apologize. Perhaps 98% would be more accurate.

Well, we all know you have questionable taste. But I can see why, he's not stupid. Just a thoroughly reprehensible horny goat.

The universe always keeps score. Call it karma, divine justice or whatever you like. Nobody escapes. What you reap you will sow.

Thank you.

Everyone has known for a very long time that the steroid performance of the stock market could not last. People have warned of overvaluations for a long time and said there will be a correction. There are many traders, some extremely accomplished and legendary traders, who have warned of a crash, for the last 15 years. It has not come to pass. Of course, eventually it will, because we all know that the next depression has to come. But right now, we're not there, but of course we will have to wait and see. Elliot waves are notoriously difficult, because they are always evolving. What looks like a wave 2 can be a wave 1, only in time is this revealed, after the fact. It's an art, not a science. Some traders are convinced there is a crash coming, and it's an honest conviction, but it's just that. Looking at the evidence we have a correction now. Not a crash.

I am an Elliot Wave trader. I had a look at the Dow Jones and there is literally NO way in HELL that 1929 was wave 2. If you would like to post a chart to support this hypothesis please do so.

Brosnan is perhaps the best looking man who ever lived. Given that Ian Fleming wanted Bond to be suave, Brosnan was a good choice. It's just his films were not written or done as well. I actually liked Brosnan. But then I liked Roger Moore as well, I loved the light hearted suave entertainment which I think Ian Fleming had in mind when he created Bond. Craig, a short, dour, ugly Bond, without humour, charisma or sex appeal, I never understood that.

Of course, who doesn't, what's not to love. Delicious chicken, perfect fries and soft ice cream. Even the Japanese love it, and they're gourmands.

Thanks for the heads up. I think you're right, at 53 it is not impossible to meet girls who seem attracted to you, but it is harder than when you were 29, and to be honest I am dreading 60 to 63, not because I think I will look much worse, but simply because on paper it will just make it harder to meet a 25 year old. But let's see, there are still 65 and 75 year old guys with 30 year old girlfriends. You're absolutely right of course, if there is no attraction on her side, it is bound to fail, because she will not put in the effort to make the relationship work. She must be attracted to you. Perhaps I will also have to target 35 or 40 year old women at some point. Time waits for noone. Anyway, extremely pleased to see you're in good hands, that's what I was hoping for.

There's an element of that but fundamentally these are families, good people, they just deserve to be led better. There is not a single German, French or Spanish government that has acted truly in the best interest of their own country. It's bizarre.

It's so nice to see that I'm not the only one who walked out on a good woman 😂. I feel a lot better. If truth be told, I also suffered with boredom. Part of the problem when you can demand so much at the beginning is that it can only get worse. Of course when the kids came, she recalibrated her life and was no longer open to do the fun things we were doing before. Life became boring, though she did nothing "wrong" either. I was pursued by beautiful 25 year old girls. Of course I paid a heavy price, but I do not regret it. Like you said, there are an infinite number of variables, and one is boredom, both for you and her. The other is that the woman changes, and often not for the better, by which I don't just mean physically. I know for sure if I am told to choose between a 25 year old and a 40 year old, it's the 25 year old every single time, unless there are particular factors. Then there is the alignment of your preferences, is her smile in the right angle, her eyes, her head the right shape, her hair the right length? Then the character, is she funny enough, kind enough, sexy enough, hard working enough. Ultimately, the person you could actually spend years in a real relationship with is rare, she will appear maybe 5 times or so in a lifetime. It is difficult. And of course women are even more demanding, lol. I was chasing perfection and in 2023 I thought I found it. A girl so unspeakably beautiful, just looking at her face without makeup I'd sometimes feel admiration for the beauty that is possible. She lived with me for a year. However, my new policy of not paying them big money anymore, coupled with business trip abroad and no doubt a real lack of attraction on her part, led to her betraying our relationship. Even after I gave her another chance, it happened again. It is so important to be ruthless with vetting. How about you, after 53, did you find a long term princess?

The Dow Jones closed 2024 with 15% up. It lost 4% yesterday. Anyone who thinks this is Armaggedon, you're probably wrong.

Is she still showing no emotion or has she told you she is in love with you, wants to be exclusive etc?