Cameroni

She won't be crushing anyone. Even sweet Tulsi Gabbard was too much to handle for her. Imagine Trump.

Such as?

That's right, giant farms of posters are being operated right now, just to produce posters who disagree with you. ' Good luck with banning all the posters who disagree with you. How's it working out so far? Lol I need to get back to my stud duties now, see ya later.

A bit rich for you to accuse someone else of this when you have engaged in incessant mispresentations of the facts 24/ 7 on literally every thread here. The only supporters who are lacking in honesty and integrity are the Democrat supporters yet again, who, when Kamala Harris tries to weasel out of a debate by requesting last minute rule changes, try to spin this as if Donald Trump does not want to debate Harris. Talk about a lack of integrity and honesty.

1. Yes. 2. Why do you want another account if you have one already? 3. It's a 5 year visa, unlikely. They explicitly said you can use it as many times as you want within a 5 year period.

The only way to deal with an ant infestation is to locate the nest and put poison that is then fed to the queen. Spraying the passage does nothing, they will just reappear once the effect of the spray wears off.

Great link as always. “My dear departed grandmothers (whose extraordinary legacy I described in a recent essay on this website), as well as my deceased parents, must be turning in their grave right now to see their family’s name, reputation and proud Jamaican identity being connected, in any way, jokingly or not with the fraudulent stereotype of a pot-smoking joy seeker and in the pursuit of identity politics,” he wrote." Impressive man.

Oh my God, so he's a pedophile by hearsay? You're going way over the top.

Well his media company was a stroke of genius and made him a fortune alone. His net worth now is 5.7 billion. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/charted-donald-trumps-net-worth-2014-2024/ Sure, he went bankrupt, but he came back. Which is even harder. If you're seriously trying to suggest that a man worth 5.7 billion is a terrible businessman I don't think youl'll have many takers. Even if he got 400 million from his fatgher, he multiplied this wealth many times over.

However, we should clarify that the 34 figure relates to 34 vouchers Trumps former lawyer received which all said "legal expense". In essence it is one crime, not 34.

Very interesting. I had seen the 1 million story but in light of this pbs link, it would indeed appear that Trump got considerably more from his father. He still multiplied it manifold, nontheless, but a good link.

No, it's not. Borscht predates nation states in Eastern Europe. Only the beetroot variety is recognised as Ukrainian. However Borscht itself long predates Ukraine as a nation-state, and various Borscht are claimed by Russians, Poles, Lithuanians and Ashkenazi Jews. Borscht is a slavic dish. The beetrot variety of Borscht can be seen as Ukrainian. However, other varieties are Russian, Polish, Lithuanian, Jewish etc.

Indeed, I think he inherited about a million USD from his father and multiplied it manifold. His economic achievements are well documented.

Yes, of course, you can go even more silly. But I mean, the president is the comannder in chief. Kamala has zero military qualifications. The president can propose legislation on economic matters like mortgages that affect hundreds of millions of people. Kamala has zero economic qualifications. The president can enter into treaties with foreign countries. Kamala has zero experience in interntational relations. If you were to convict some burglars, Kamala is a choice that makes sense. But for president, surely this woman is extremely poorly qualified?

They should not, but they can and will if the rule is stupid. So best not to have stupid rules.

Strict separation between state and religion is a must. This mandate to put a bible in every class is frankly reprehensible. Storm in a teacup because teachers can just ignore it. Put a cloth on it or something. But separation of state and religion is of paramount importance. This cannot stand.

Trump is a pedophile? Come on man. Sure some businesses fail, but his economic achievements are a matter of record. What economic achievements has Kamala Harris to show for herself? I've earned more than her in some years. Her net worth is down to her lawyer husband.

Well, he had a privileged upbringing, but he turned the million dollars he was given into an empire almost worth a billion, lost it and then regained it. I mean you can say what you like about Trump, but when it comes to economics, he's been a major player. Harris was a major player in criminal courts. Same with Vance, btw, he's worth 10 million and started his own firms, knows venture capitalism. How is he not considerably more qualified than Harris to handle the economy?

This has got to be the most idiotic thread ever started on this forum. Lol.

Her woke thing, support for BLM and support for DEI, makes her undesirable politically. But on sheer ability, I don't get why a criminal attorney is the top choice here. It's bizarre.

A general, after WWII is perfectly understandable. Kennedy was a war hero, again understandable. LBJ worked his way up from abject poverty, he was not privileged like Kamala Harris, Carter had a military career before he became a farmer. Most of those men had some kind of qualification for the job of president. But Kamala Harris, who is clearly a smart and accomplished woman with highly intelligent parents and had a semi-privileged upbringing, well she was a criminal prosecutor. She seems uniquely unqualified for the job of president.

But you understand that the President is the commander in chief, has the power to enter into treaties, and to propose legislation on the economy? Do you seriously think a criminal attorney who graduated from Howard University and who spent her life prosecuting burglaries is the best choice here? I mean if you had to prosecute a burglary, okay, but we're talking commander in chief, economy, proposing legislation that affects mortgages, how is Kamala Harris remotely qualified for this job?

Can I ask a serious question please? So Kamala Harris is a criminal attorney. Why, o why, would any voter put a criminal attorney in charge of the economy and foreign policy? Isn't that the pinnacle of stupidity?

Kamala, you're a criminal attorney. Why would or should America put its economy into the hands of a criminal attorney who lacks the most rudimentary understanding of economics?

If he asked her "Do you think men should b e allowed to grab a woman by the pussy" he would go down in history. He may lose. But he'd be immortal.