WDSmart

Nope Yep. What do you think is causing all the problems?

You asked for a link to my recommendations, so I gave you one.

Here is a link to my recommendations: Rung & Bill: Israel/Palestine Proposed Resolution (billsmart.com)

Why are my recommendations irrelevant? Are you sure they are not being discussed? If so, what ones are? I suggest many of my recommendations, or some like them, are being discussed—or, at least, they should be.

Muslims and Jews can be US citizens, too.

It's not a circle; it's a Moebius strip. Here's my recommendation: 1. Immediate ceasefire and withdrawal of troops; 2. Partial release of hostages and exchange of prisoners (about half); 3. Implementation of a 3rd-party (like the UN) peacekeeping force; 4, Withdrawal of troops and permanent ceasefire; 5. Release of rest of hostages and exchange of all prisoners; 6. Forced talks on a two-state solution. My further recommendation of a two-state solution would be to divide up the land as the UN suggested in 1947 when they created the state of Israel, which divided the land up into about 53% Jewish, 46% Arab, and 1% Common (Jerusalem). Here's a map of that with a link below it. (I'd also include two small "Common" areas, like a large roundabouts, to join the Arab areas and Jewish areas where they intersect just east of Gaza and north of Jenin.) United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia

I didn't say "the US government." I said, "The USA..." now supports a PERMANENT ceasefire.

Okay, here are two links to my claim that the USA now backs a PERMANENT ceasefire in Gaza... U.S. Polls Show Shifting Landscapes on Gaza Ceasefire - Bridge Initiative (georgetown.edu) Most US Voters Support Permanent Ceasefire in Gaza, New Polling Finds | Truthout

There has never been any of your reading of my posts that are convenient. I've posted details of what I would like to see in an agreement numerous times on this and other topics. I'm not going to list them all here again.

Yes, of course, I know there will be other conditions for an agreement. It's a lie to insinuate that I don't. I hope one of those conditions is continuing talks to work out a two-state solution. I'd suggest something like the 50:50 division of land that the UN designated in the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948.

The USA is now also siding with the Palestinian's call for a PERMANENT ceasefire. And, Israel could not have provoked all these attacks by not sizing and occupying Palestinian land.

That depends on who I was and where and when I encountered them. - If I were a policeman, national guardsman, or in some other group assigned to guard a federal building, and if it was being attacked by people who were armed and firing guns or wielding other weapons that were threatening our safety, yes, I would consider shooting them. - But, if you're talking about me, someone who only watched some of the insurrection on TV, and now, after the turmoil has subsided and some of the "insurrectionists" have been captured and arrested, no, I wouldn't think they should be shot. They should be charged with whatever crimes they are believed to have committed and brought to trial. If found guilty, they should be sentenced to serve whatever time was appropriate. The only situation in which I would agree that they should be executed would be if they were found guilty of murder while engaging in insurrection, and a jury and judge agreed to that.

I don't know about the "bulk" of my fellow countrymen, but I do despise all those who are Trump supporters. I think that is about 35% now. According to the Bing online dictionary: "The main difference between agnostics and atheists is: - Atheists lack belief in God, believe there is no god, or have an absence of belief in gods. - Agnostics either believe that it is impossible to know whether there is a god (even if they believe in the possibility) or are noncommittal on the issue. It is possible to be both an agnostic and an atheist." Please reread the last sentence in that definition. I do support: - abortion on demand, for any reason, at any time, - supporting Ukraine in its resistance against the Russian invasion, - open borders, at least borders that are open to all who want to come and file immigration requests, especially those based on asylum, - I believe the belief that other cultures with different beliefs and customs than we have should not be automatically treated as inferior, - I definitely believe in structural racism. Our country, the USA, is a good example of that, - I had to look up "d e I" and found it stands for "diversity, equity, and inclusion." I do support that. I'm not mainstream. I'm a far-left liberal, a socialist. But, as I've said repeatedly, I don't think Trump supporters are "mainstream" either. At least, I certainly hope not.

I vehemently disagree with you on all the points above except...I like football, but American football only. I think you should be able to say whatever you want in a public forum on social media without censorship. I am an agnostic, but I prefer the term "atheist." I like science fiction. I support all types of tax increases. And, other than that, I despise people like you have described yourself above.

Five people died as a result of the Jan 6 Insurrection... "A police officer was beaten, a rioter was shot, and three others died during the rampage." These Are the People Who Died in the Capitol Riot - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

I actually think that no matter who wins, Biden or Trump, the other side will believe the elections have been rigged or misconducted in some way. Neither side will accept the results, and I think then, there will be violence. I'll be watching it all on CNN from my living room up in the jungle-filled mountains of Thailand.

well, there is your answer..... if he is as bad as you say, but the people still chose him what does that say for the people he ran against IMO, it doesn't say much about who he ran against. He only says what kind of people would vote for him. And most of them are so conned by him that they believe all the bad things he and his other supporters say about his opponents. There are two types of people, IMO, that support Trump: Those who have been duped and conned by him and those who are the same, corrupt, disgusting type of person as he is. Right now, it doesn't matter to me which type someone is. I loathe them all.

Yes, I may be, and I'm sure there are some problems there, but I will NEVER understand why anyone in their right mind would support Trump. He's the epitome of dishonesty, vulgarity, and chaos, as far as I'm concerned.

Jill Biden, Joe Biden's wife, is a woman. Joe is a man. Of course, I have no proof of this. What do you mean by "got nothing"? Do you mean jail time or a fine for something? No, as far as I know, Joe Biden has never been convicted of anything.

I agree with your supposition, but these "buffoons" broke into the capital building, fought with police, and just MIGHT elect Trump president again. I say, lock 'em all up.

I define religion as "a system of belief based on faith." So, I do consider Buddhism a religion. I also consider all science, physics, and math as a religion.

Come and get us big boy I think the US justice system is doing fairly well at doing that right now, including the 91 (at last count) indictments against Trump himself. I hope he gets convicted and sent to jail before the election in Nov, but if he doesn't, I sincerely hope he isn't re-elected president. That would be a catastrophe. Of course, I'm living in Thailand now and have for 20 years, and I don't expect to ever go back there to live. But I would hate to see what would happen to the country if Trump got re-elected for my kids', grandkids', and great-grandkids' sake. What bothers me the most about Trump is how many supporters he has. It's about maybe 35-40% if the citizens. I just can't understand that, but it makes me sad there are so many who evidently think like he does.

I'm not trying to justify this shooting, but usually, incidents like this are prompted by a history of disagreements between the parties.

"Lock 'em up!" Lock them all up, including their leader, Trump...

IMO, there are way too many Farang men who come to Thailand expecting low-cost or free sexual encounters with Thai women or ladyboys. I suspect that the majority of these clashes are because the Farang has not had all of his expectations fully realized. I think there is also the possibility that some of these incidents that do not have a sexual aspect are due to a lack of understanding on the part of the Farang of the customs and the language of Thais. Most Thais that I come in contact with are very polite and never aggressive, even when we have a disagreement or misunderstanding.