Peter Crow

Guess you are trying to say "same same"? But I have now idea who is burning that car.

Sure.

For good reasons..

Why doesn't he wear his tutu for this presentation?

One reason is enough: he is Putin's Puppet. An proof will come out in due course.

I think the key is wether the wife can get a job in Australia and how much she can make on top of the OP's weekly AUD 800. Life is good in Australia but the median weekly household income in Australia is around $1,770, and more would be needed if the OP doesn't own a home.

Yep, serves them right, next time they'll chose an honest job.

These idiots have never heard of voice...

Ooh yes

What is a "doggy back" ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0N0f43s1so

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1440785159427394

Neither has the global warming, nor the end of the world... But I appreciate your rock solid argumentation.

How much is the concession?

I think you miss the point completely. Basically two things were said [in 45 minute]. a) If someone doesn't comply with his tax obligation TRD will report the culprit to TRP who will obtain a court order to catch the delinquent, who could then be stopped from leaving the country by TI. Simple, and we have known that for a while. b) Since a monthly income of 65000 (40000 for marriage) is required to obtain an extension of stay based on income this income must have been reported to TRD. They won't ask for such certificate to check whether you are tax compliant, but they will use it to verify that your income complies with the 65k/40k requirement. So Tax enforcement in a) and smart use of tax data by immigration in b): the new world of Thai interdepartmental cooperation. Now you can keep screaming, kicking and hissing, but that's the plan, of some people in the administrations at least, it may well proceed though, with a few hiccups.

Sex isn't only penetration, you must my such a boring partner, Gay or not.

Bring Your Drive.

Yep, he just organised and facilitated the webinar.

Never been to a "gym", dig out my coconut stumps instead, while chatting up the soi dogs, whom I'll never hump.

Ridiculous, anyhow I strongly encourage everyone to watch the webinar, and in doubt, ask Carl Turner what his understanding is.

He definitely said so. My understanding was that immigration would now use the Thai tax return as a proof of 65K/month (40K for marriage extension). Which makes sense I reckon as the one of the topic of the webinar was the cooperation between RTP, TRD and IO. He also kept repeating "don't worry, be a law abiding subject..", which we all are, aren't we?

You could be right for two reasons: a) Requesting an IT statement would make total sense, Thais don't like things that are fair and square... b) This might upset somewhat the situation with the so called "visa agents", so don't rock the boat that carries the cash cow.

Praised be.

And as mentioned towards the end of the webinar any change could not become applicable during the fiscal year it is gazetted. Remember the Por 161 & 162 were published en 2023 to become applicable in 2024.

Says who? Now combine a weak USD with the Genius' tariffs and lets see what happens to the price of all imported good...