JonnyF

I doubt Lebron James is too concerned about women in basketball. I doubt Tyson Fury is too worried about the next female heavyweight. I doubt Ed Kemper was worried about being raped by a trans male. So yes, it's a bigger problem for women than males. I would have thought that was obvious. That's why some men dismiss the issues as "such a tiny problem". A callous attitude towards the rights of women.

Only if one disregards the rights of an unborn child.

The exception that proves the rule.

When the leader of the opposition cannot even define a woman, yes it affects the vast majority of women. When they are labelled "people with vaginas" it affects them. As it does for any woman competing in sport, any woman who wants the right to change their clothes or go to the toilet without men around, to serve a sentence without male rapists around, to have their young daughters play sport ina fair and safe environment. Stop minimizing misogyny.

Since you are being somewhat ambiguous, I will assume you are referring to abortion rights and not the rights of teenage girls to remove their own body parts. Playing devil's advocate (since I am still somewhat torn on some of these abortion issues), one could argue that in 50% of cases they are protecting the rights of unborn women.

I'm not sure who these people on the extreme right are, but it was really interesting to hear that women are a small % of the population. Who knew?

Women's rights are eroding at an incredible pace. The trans movement is seeing to that. Many politicians like Starmer refuse to even acknowledge or define what a woman is. Some groups refer to them as "people with vaginas" or similar distateful terminology . Sturgeon supports putting biologically male rapists into women's prisons, further eroding their right to safety while in detention. Soon, we may even see biological men legally beating up biological women in boxing rings. They are already taking their medals in events like swimming. All in the name of being "kind" and "progressive". Just as these so called "progressives" have set race relations back decades, they are now in the process of setting back women's rights decades.

I wonder if they'll consider changing the song they walk out to? That Roses song isn't bad, but maybe something more appropriate might be better? ????

Maybe you're feeling a bit stressed out?

Not quite. "Senior" royals? Yes. If you are a senior member of the British Royal family and you love your country, yes you should live there. With all that incredible privilige, comes a bit of duty. Sure, you can still take luxury tours around the world a few times per year, be chauffered to attend Hiso parties, sporting events, meet famous people etc. But you have to do a few days work in return. Most of us would consider it quite a good deal. Of course, for us plebs the rules are a bit different. No privilige, hence no duty to remain in our country of birth. The problem with Harry and Harry's wife, they wanted the privilige part without the duty part. They wanted the money and the stately homes, the security, the servants. They just didn't want to do any of the work. Well, as he's finding out, it doesn't really work like that. Hence the monetization of screwing over his family. Because that's all he's got. No skills, no talent. Just some famous relatives and a lack of loyalty/moral compass. Imagine slagging off your own brother and father for a living. What a way to live.

In fairness to Lefties, it's not all of them. In my experience it tends to be American, White, (mainly but not exclusively Non-Hetero) Liberals who are so quick to label anyone who disagrees with them as fascists, Nazis etc. It's all a bit overly dramatic and best ignored, although ignoring it is becoming increasingly difficult since they love to focus on what makes them so "special" rather than what we all have in common. Michael Knowles in wrong in this case. It should not be eradicated, but it would be helpful to all concerned if people focused on more important things and we all just got on with our lives.

I doubt many of the Asian based expats would be granted the free large stately homes, the chauffuers, the fleet of luxury vehicles, the palace grounds, the servants, the security, the executive boxes at major sporting events, the invitations to high society functions, the ability to have all of this while not even having to hold down a real job. Just be driven to a few charity events here and there, cut some ribbon, shake some hands, exchange pleasantries. Do some actual good in the world, instead of just talking about it. Harry gets all of that when in the UK, and none of it (for free) when in the US. Asian based expats like myself get a far better quality of life here than I would have in the UK. I am still very fond of it there though, and don't feel the need to constantly deride it. Of course the UK isn't perfect, where is? Not Thailand. And certainly not the US. Harry hates the UK because he is an entitled spoiled brat. I'd imagine being stuck away from his friends and family, doing drugs, juggling and feeding chickens in that house in Montecito he's already realizing how good he had it in the UK. Alas, his ego (and his wife) won't allow him to acknowledge the huge mistake he's made. In the words of Ice-T, you played yourself Harry. Ain't nobody else's fault, you played yourself.

I quite like it there. Phala beach, Phayun beach, the strip of bars (maybe seen better days) etc. It always seemed like a place that was better to visit for a weekend than to actually live there though.

Please provide evidence that she wasn't accepted. All the evidence I see (the fantastic cottage, the multi million pound wedding, the glowing words) indicate that she was absolutely accepted by the family. She just preferred California so she manufactured the victim narrative to justify leaving. Some people fell for it. Not many though. Most see exactly who she is and what happened.

Agreed. Myself included (although I don't hate facets, merely dislike them). Had he left the country and just got on with his life I would have assumed this to be the case. However, he didn't. He left the country and has ripped into it publicly for 2 years. His obsession with it is not natural. These are not the actions of a man who simply dislikes some aspects of it. He clearly despises it. The title of Tom Bower's book "Revenge" was spot on.

His actions of leaving his country, his family, his duty and then slagging them off shows exactly what he thinks. Why would he pick up an award for fighting racism in the Royal Family (and then confirm 2 weeks later there is no racism) unless he hated it? He even says it in the video below, straight from the horses mouth. Well, thanks to your constant moaning, lying and trashing your country no longer likes you, Harry. What a spoiled brat.

Well the dress is not a living entity so No, it cannot break the rules. AOC's payments for the rental of the dress broke them. I love intelligent women. Attention seeking narcissists? Not so much.

Another nail in the coffin of women's sport. I wonder how long before we get to see biologically male boxers battering women in the boxing ring? All in the name of being kind and progressive of course ????.

He's hardly going to come out and say "I'm trying to bring down the Monarchy" is he? Not even quarterwit Harry is that stupid. However his constant attacks on the King, the future King, the recently deceased Queen, collecting awards for fighting racism in the Royal Family (which he later denied existed) and attacks on the institution itself clearly indicate he is trying to do as much damage as possible to the Monarchy. Still keeping his titles though ????. Merchers gonna Merch.

Depends how she paid for it. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/05/nyregion/aoc-met-gala-house-ethics.html I'm sure she's enjoying all the attention anyway.

Wow didn't see that coming, I felt Utd's recent results had been better than their performances but 7-0??? Wow. I hope Rick is OK. Tough pill to swallow. Maybe he can drown his sorrows with a Vodka and Lemonade?

It's a bit more than a family dispute. They are actively trying to bring down the British Monarchy. They'd better have thick skin if they do come back. All the good will and adoration that was originally shown to Meghan has gone. They will be booed everywhere they go. Rightly so, they are a disgrace. Very real security concerns as well. After his comments on the Taliban he'd better be careful in places like London where there are plenty of sleeper cells that would be more than happy to become martyrs by exacting revenge for his boasting about his kill count. From Invictus to Evict Us. Not too smart that boy Harry.

This woman simply loves attention. Look at meeeeeeee.... The dress was hideous and broke ethics rules. The message was straight of a sixth form common room. Apart from that, whoooo way to go girl!!!

They're probably busily filming the opening of the invitation, then Meghan crying on the floor (left eye only) for the next Netflix series. Hopefully they stay away. Chris Rock did a great stand up hitpiece on this pair of Charlatans. Very amusing. Even black Americans have grown tired of the constant merching of imaginary victimhood.

Similarly, not every SNP voter is an anti English nationalist Braveheart wannabe. But every anti English Braveheart wannabe is an SNP voter. Anyway Sturgeon is gone so let's not pretend Scottish independence is still realistic. Back on topic. Multi millionaire victims Harry and Meghan losing their multi million pound holiday home in a country they hate is not the biggest humanitarian crisis right now. Good riddance to the dastardly duo. It's a shame exile is not possible.